I read somewhere that Vegetius mentioned that Roman soldiers were marked with tattoos. I was wondering if anyone could expand a bit on the topic.
I read somewhere that Vegetius mentioned that Roman soldiers were marked with tattoos. I was wondering if anyone could expand a bit on the topic.
I read somewhere that roman legionaries had tattoos, but that was in the later period (third century AD i think).
I think I´ve read that somewhere too, but as I recall it was the German and other foreign members of the Legions that were tattooed, not actual Italian legionaries. Not that there were many of those in the third century AD anyway.
The Appomination
I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.
I was under the impression that Romans believed that tattoos, hair product, and to a lesser extent facial hair, were barbaric. But it would make sense for a 3rd century Germanic soldier in the employ of the Empire to have tattoos.
I know Roman soldiers were tattoed to avoid them deserting.
This space intentionally left blank.
There is also the scene in The Gladiator when Maximus removes the SPQR tattoo
from his shoulder. But movies dont care about historical accuracy.![]()
Bookmarks