Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: Recruitment in Celtiberia

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #26
    Member Member Bactron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Prague, Czech rep.
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Recruitment in Celtiberia

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasm
    To call Lusitanians a branch of the Celtiberians is wrong in my view, and an oversimplification - remember that the ancient authors themselves do not refer to them as Celtiberians. Other terms such as Iberians and Gallaeci are also major major oversimplifications.
    Well "branch of Celtiberians" was my wording, not of Osprey's. So I think that you are unrightly harsh on them while you should be harsh on me.

    Here is again what I quoted from the book about Celt-Iberians.

    "The central area of Spain, known today as the Meseta or Plateau, comprising the provinces of Salamanca, Caceres, Badajoz and Valladolid and Portugal, was inhabited by peoples who are known today by the conventional name of "Celt-Iberians" in obvious reference to a fusion of Celtic and Iberian cultures. Their great tribes were the Lusitani, the Vettones, the Vaccei, the Carpetani, the Arevaci and the Pellendones. Each of these tribes had its own distinct personality...."

    This really doesn't seem as oversimplification (I will give you that that I had indeed oversimplify that by choosing that rather dull word branch) But as you can see in Osprey there is clearly written that we know those people TODAY by the conventional name of Celt-Iberians, and then they also continue with stating that each of these tribes had its own distinct personality and continue with a brief description of some of those named tribes.
    Last edited by Bactron; 03-05-2008 at 19:06.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO