There has been allot of complaining on this thread, and others, of the lack of historical accuracy in R:TW, while I agree that it's obivious that the game isn't exactly a comprehensive guide to the realities of ancient warfare, I still think that, for a game, it does a fairly good job. I mean, in most games all you may get to distinguish one faction from another is a couple of unique units and a slightly modified tech tree. So I was wondering, how does the historical accuracy of S:TW and M:TW, originals before the expansions, compare? I have never played those games, so if the thier accuracy was superior to R:TW then I could see the reason for the hostility. Please note that I am not trying to take one side or the other, I am just seeking to understand the opinions of the people on this board.
Bookmarks