Last edited by The Stranger; 07-05-2013 at 13:41.
We do not sow.
it seems it is hard for you... the australians are the lowest number on the map. the reason i edited my post is because the first map i checked didnt state that it is about indigenous people only. the second one did state it, so i edited.
the face you show here is not pretty frag, its quite sad tbh.
We do not sow.
Check the map mia muca, next time be a little bit better at life
Edit, it could be taken as an insult, none intended
Last edited by Fragony; 07-05-2013 at 13:51.
maybe you should give a better link then. because i get a google page with a lot of maps, and the first one and second one are these:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...-Map-World.png
http://www.vdare.com/images/032206_World_IQ.JPG
Last edited by The Stranger; 07-05-2013 at 13:53.
We do not sow.
Defenders actually. Usually bad. The coaches teach them the difference between a ball and a player and explain that you're allowed to kick the former and not the latter, but, when they can't get to the former because the latter already got it, you're than allowed to kick the latter to stop him taking the former past you.
After they master that, they're released upon unsuspecting world. And may God have mercy on their opponents.
Last edited by Sarmatian; 07-05-2013 at 13:55.
I don't really know, but they all show the same http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&si...FsqNtQao-YC4CQ
well i suppose i get different stuff then. because i see maps about IQ of indigenous people, of the country as it is now, I see maps about GDP, some maps dont even make sense. It is a right mess...
like this one... http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity....ftheWorld2.jpg
Last edited by The Stranger; 07-05-2013 at 14:02.
We do not sow.
I don't believe phd's who are universally discredited by the entire scientific community, no. Especially when that community is backed up by research showing the opposite.
But honestly, we've been through this at great length already. I can't be bothered to repeat it. Expect nothing more than snide comments ridiculing you from me on this.
That's the ones who either can't run or can't be bothered to(I was a defender...).
Last edited by HoreTore; 07-05-2013 at 14:06.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
They are not from Adam Smiths masterpiece, no.
Anyway, the work you tried to refer to has been widely discredited, as has Lynn himself, who now sits on the board of a foundation founded by this charming fellow. Lynn calls for the complete expulsion from Europe and the US of all people from cultures he gives lower IQ scores and calls for an intensive eugenics program which includes banning women from the workplace in order to make them have more babies.
Yeah sure, not a nazi at all that guy.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
He kinda was I guess. But differentiating between cultures remains an excellent idea nevertheless. Of course that is racist, but it's also a pretty good idea. What use do we have for people who are by our standards pretty much retarded. Go herding goats on the mountain you rolled of, it won't work
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Maybe we could send them to Somalia in an effort to raise the nations average IQ?
Regardless, can I take it that most people here are OK with racial science, just that they question the use of it? That is more than fair. I wrote this primarily because of my frustration of the taboo and ban on racial science.
Some seem to think races play a very minor part of what being a person is...
If we found some DNA strings that control behavioristics, and can tell that it differs between racial groups... Should that not mean that special consideration must be shown when these two groups of people must co-exist?
As a sidenote, is it possible that behavioristics that one group feel as "natural" could cause a feeling of "ill at ease" in the other group, and that it's actually solely DNA that dictates this?
Last edited by HoreTore; 07-05-2013 at 20:11. Reason: added missing word...
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
We do not sow.
If you are willing to treat some people so inhumane by forcefully (this can also be forcefully by law, not necessarily by brute force) removing them from their homes, then I think my question is warrented.
Now I know you haven't said that, and that your response was most likely some sort of a joke, so if the above doesn't apply to you, then don't feel pressured to answer the question. I didn't expect an answer to begin with.
We do not sow.
What I wanted to point out, was that outcries and emotional responses such as yours is just why it's SO DAMN HARD to do something constructive in this field of research.
Fact is that different human populations quite often have a very hard time co-existing peacefully. Having people screaming "BLOODY MURDER" when someone wants to be constructive and research into it, isn't necessarily the best idea.
I have no clue what you are talking about, if your post is supposed to point out any of that, then you completely misunderstood what you were replying to. I was responding to Horetore's confusion about the alleged meaning of Fragony's post. You made some sort of witty remark, and if it wasn't that, then I don't know what the point of your post was. Because my post had nothing to do with race in itself, it was about intelligence, so it would include the mentally ill, the mentally handicapped etc. You then said that we could send those people to Somalia (to make Somalia a smarter country). I asked you then, why not just kill these people, because A) I already explained that in the previous post and B) if you send retarded people to Somalia, they will certainly die, so why not just kill them outright.
I've not said anything about the research, or its usefulness, as of yet. And I don't really see any constructive debate going on, just one person venting his rage because he feels he is not allowed to be a racist (for better or worse), and another one just venting bullshit.
Last edited by The Stranger; 07-05-2013 at 21:01.
We do not sow.
Not throwing that around at all, I am just not opposed to the theory that there are differences, actually judging people would be something different. So yes it is racist, but it's not hostile. Black is not another shade off white. Why the que care isn't that kinda obvious. Does is matter, no.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Ah, well then I guess I misread your post: I assumed those doing the looking would be the government or some other similar agent, not that you were talking about the need for more research, of which I completely agree.
Luckily for the both of us, there's an entire scientific field devoted to that kind of study: social anthropology.
Sadly for the racists and nazis, they tend to come up with conclusions who oppose the nazi agenda...
Last edited by HoreTore; 07-05-2013 at 21:05.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Bookmarks