As fraught as the UN is with problems I'm still a supporter of the institution. It like many things needs reform so that the Human Rights section isn't filled and chaired by countries that are the worst violators. The Security Council, though it has usually been a deadlock between the US plus Allies versus USSR/Russia/China still has been able to put more sanctions on countries, has been a good forum for at least discussing problems instead of defaulting to war. There's something to be said that there hasn't been a world war since the second one and the UN together with nuclear deterrent has been a part of that.
While I wish the US found more support in it I'm not surprised that most of the third world usually votes with their pockets or history and sides with Russia or China. That does not however make it a useless organization. I'm glad it's based in NYC which in part is what keeps us from leaving it which would leave it purely as a forum for our rivals while at the same time allowing them to get international legitimacy while the US would then be a 'rogue' state though a great power one at that.
A UN without the US would lead to it being as useless and weak as the League of Nations which would in turn likely lead to more regional wars because most countries would just need to seek a tacit okay from Russia or China and not have to worry about it being an illegal war. If the US walks from the world there's no longer the Pax Britannia-Frankia to ensure free trade and curb the return of regional hegemonies.
PS: When's the Backroom going on it's annual Christmas Truce?
Bookmarks