Fellow House members, I believe it is time we discuss the edicts proposed in the Senate.
Here are my own opinions on them:
Edict 1.1 I am not sure about. It seems an odd thing to make a law for, as we all have pledged our loyalty to the Emperor, or we wouldn't be Senators. It is up to each of us to individually decide whether to support this edict.
Edict 1.2 I support wholeheartedly. The empire needs to grow to face it's enemies. Our House in particular is well situated to serve the Empire by taking Rhodes and Smyrna.
Edict 1.3 I support this Edict strongly as well, but that is a personal matter of piety.
Edict 1.4 I would like the House to support this one as much as 1.2 Antioch remains a great city, and was a seat of a Patriarch. It could easily be in Roman hands again, and should be.
Edict 1.5 I support this one as well, although it would be faster were we given temporary use of the navy in the Aegean sea than to build a new port at Athens for new ships or rely on a single mercenary ship.
Edict 1.6 A project of two of our House members, I believe we should support this.
Edict 1.7 This one is tempting, giving one province to our friend Michail and one to a member of our House, however I believe House Tagamata has an especially strong interest in Arta. While the attempt of one of their members to push the Order into expanding in our direction was vexing, it is not so that I would attempt to take their only easy avenue of expansion. I cannot ask my House to support this Edict.
I welcome discussion on any of the recommendations I have made.
Bookmarks