Some thoughts on the War on Terror

[PanzerJaeger]

Welcome to the backroom (I think)!

Such an approach would arguably leave the President in dereliction of his primary duty to defend the American people. Now, does that mean that America must invade backwater nations across the globe to defend itself? No, that has proved to be a less-than-effective strategy. And it may even be beneficial to reduce our military presence in the Middle East that still lingers from the First Gulf War, especially in Saudi Arabia. However, the President, and the various defense agencies under his control, have a responsibility to pursue some strategy in an effort to proactively disrupt and destroy these groups.

How would the President defend your proposed course of action to the American people, especially in the aftermath of a successful terrorist attack?

Also, given Tibet's situation, I'm not sure they are a great example of successful nonviolence.