Thanks.
Unvote; Vote: God Emperor
Voting closed.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Clinton, Iowa
Day 4
After four miserable, muddy days, it seemed that a consensus was at last starting to emerge amongst the campers, although "survivors" would probably at this point be a better descriptor of their status. Instead of having votes haphazardly flung every which way, it seemed that the survivors were finally realizing the desperation of their situation and exercising greater concentration. Camps, of the metaphorical variety, were starting to form. Voting blocs emerged. When once there were nine or even ten viable candidates, now there were only three.
Of course now, the biggest problem was breaking the deadlock between the three: Chaotix, God Emperor, and Scienter. All three candidates seemed viable. All three seemed to have cases, and at the same time the arguments for each of their guilt had some holes in it. It was a combination of these factors that had voting continue for a much longer period than usual, deeper into the night. Over time, each faction seemed to gain and lose steam. Coherent arguments were being made.
It was almost as if... people were actually working together.
In the end, while this new strategy may have been good for the campers as a whole as they faced this doom, it was most certainly not good for God Emperor, who ended up as the clear "winner" after the marathon voting session. Immediately starting to twitch, God Emperor looked around every which way, closely marking the positions of all of the logs and all of the scattered fires going around the campground. At the very least, he was not going to be taken by surprise, definitely so since the sun wasn't going to go down.
Growing more and more frazzled, God Emperor started staring around even more wildly, which took all of the other campers aback as they slowly started to edge away from him. "Well?" he cried out after some minutes, a crazed look in his eye, "What's it gonna be? Have at it, then! Finish me off! I SAID FINISH ME!!!!!!"
Nobody moved.
"So what now??!" God Emperor said. "What's the matter, can't kill anybody if you can't take them by surprise? You know what, all of you are - *gack!*"
God Emperor went down to the ground, groaning and clutching his chest. It had turned out that all of this excitement was simply too much for his heart, and he literally died of fright.
Day 4 tally:
God Emperor: 6 (TheLastDays, Csargo, B_Ray, JHT, ATPG, Visorslash)
Chaotix: 2 (God Emperor, Scienter)
Scienter: 2 (Andres, khaan)
ATPG: 1 (Chaotix)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Still alive: 10
Yaseikhaan
Visorslash
B_Ray
Csargo
Andres
johnhughthom
Scienter
Askthepizzaguy
TheLastDays
Chaotix
Killed:
Renata
robbiecon
Reenk Roink
Executed:
Who am i?
Zack
Diamondeye
God Emperor
It is now Night 4. This phase will last for approximately 24 hours.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Those last few posts from God Emperor sounded pretty scummy.
EDIT: also, this constant bickering between ATPG and Chaotix is starting to bother me. Both mafiosi hating each other in the public thread is not an unusual scum tactic.
Last edited by Andres; 05-17-2011 at 20:33.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
They did, actually.
I finally have an opinion. Well, getting there anyway.
Last edited by Renata; 05-17-2011 at 21:30.
Oh well.. I can still haunt the thread ^_^Although you guys seem awfully sure of yourself !![]()
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces.
I have got a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel
INTP
Irrelevant, now that he's dead. Kicking a corpse when he's down? What for, oh fellow blueberry?
I predict that you and Chaotix are scum, actually.EDIT: also, this constant bickering between ATPG and Chaotix is starting to bother me. Both mafiosi hating each other in the public thread is not an unusual scum tactic.
The point of the line you just dropped like a big fake dooky, is not only that you'll be voting for me shortly, but also distancing yourself from Chaotix, so when I inevitably think you're scum, I also don't think Chaotix is scum.
And so, you and Chaotix are now my top suspects. Thanks for assisting me.
DE: Yaseikhaan, DE, Csargo, Reenk, TLD
Chaotix: ATPG, JHT, Visor, Andres.
Distancing tactic. DE is still in the lead.
DE (re)votes for Chaotix, Andres switches to DE, which is nonsensical from any perspective.
He never intended to vote for Chaotix. He wants to distance himself from Chaotix.
He's done it at least twice this game, to act like he wants Chaotix to die, but no.
Last edited by Askthepizzaguy; 05-18-2011 at 11:11.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Since when are we supposed to post only relevant posts in a mafia game?
And how is having an opinion about another player, dead or alive, irrelevant? Say X was lynched round 1. In round 6, in retrospect and after re-reading, X sounded really, really scummy and there's a relation with Y, who is still alive in the final round. The analysis of X is important then.
So, saying that expressing an opinion about a dead player is irrelevant is nonsense.
The Chaotix and DE thing; as you must have seen, I made a big post in capital letters to complain about silence being broken. Voting Chaotix, because "he talks too much", clearly builds further on that joke post. You will also have noted that my activity in that period of the game was very, very low. It should be obvious that I really didn't have a clue, so I switched to DE for no other reason than the fact that he happened to be online and said he lied.
You're trying to make a case out of nothing.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
I didn't like this either initially, but reading it once more, there is the possibility given the game mechanics of no reveals that he is trying to determine the guilt of one already killed, which is understandable and not actually irrelevant.
This is a bit contrived, but I can see where the connection would be, so this might be worth going for a bit. I don't think it's any stronger than Andres pointing out the obvious bickering between you and Chaotix as a screen either though.I predict that you and Chaotix are scum, actually.
The point of the line you just dropped like a big fake dooky, is not only that you'll be voting for me shortly, but also distancing yourself from Chaotix, so when I inevitably think you're scum, I also don't think Chaotix is scum.
And so, you and Chaotix are now my top suspects. Thanks for assisting me.
I think Chaotix being at the center of these two accusations is pretty interesting though. At this point (could change after the kill is posted) I would lynch Chaotix even though I think both cases aren't great, because they are some of the only somewhat explicit cases right now, also because of his centrality to both of them, and I'm not sure on this but I think he voted for me this game and we can't leave any of those type of people alive.
I think your refutation of his case is decent, so I'm wondering why you make a case on him out of nothing as well? Granted, Atpg hasn't tried to refute the case like you have. He has basically resorted to sarcastic dismissals of it, maybe implicitly stating that such an obvious joking link shouldn't be taken seriously?Originally Posted by Andres
But he could counter that he did not X in a very similar Y situation with a Z alignment. And I'm betting there is an example of that out there. Furthermore, as Andres has pointed out (later), your behavior in this game has taken the turn of your previous X behavior in similar situation Y with Z alignment. What does this show? Almost nothing by itself. Even tied in with a preexisting case it reeks of being forced. Not really a good sign, either for a townie or mafia.Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
Let's focus on the cases dealing mainly and mostly with in game actions, like we have so far. It seems to be the best analytical method (I can't believe I used the positively connotated superlative best to modify analytical methods- anyway do note operative word analytical, I don't wish to imply at all that it is the best method in general).
Hypocrisy requires that the wideranging milieu of the posts in question are similar. Maybe Atpg won't see it that way?Originally Posted by Andres
This is a good reply. You should have made your implied accusations of connection a bit more explicit though. I also think you should have pushed the Chaotix unvote thing further.While I made just one joke vote on Chaotix, you have been at his throat for several rounds now, yet last round, you unvoted him and switched to G_E. Odd, seeing how you wanted Chaotix lynched so bad for a long while now.
If there's a connection between scum buddies, than it's between you and Chaotix.
But I must ask, Atpg seemed to imply that you unovted Chaotix for DE when it was kind of close (though DE was still in the lead). What was the situation like when he unvoted Chaotix for DE? More tight?
I agree that a charge of hypocrisy is fairly weak when trying to adduce guilt, but I think Andres was crying hypocrisy in your case against him, which (as he sees it though not entirely unreasonably) is similar to a case that can be applied to you (and which he has tried to apply).Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
The hypocrisy charge seems to be used as a defensive stratagem against your accusation rather than an accusatory method. Fairly good response by Andres I'd say.
I did note that defensiveness as well. It should be kept in mind, but nervous flinching is hardly damning and shouldn't be used as such at this point. We have a lot more to go on.Originally Posted by Andres
Somewhat off topic: attack is the best defense. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORxD2KFQ4oo
FINALLY ANDRES.Originally Posted by Andres
Could you not have made this clear earlier so it would look a lot worse when evasion was employed?
What the ****? K, maybe thatreaction was too strong, but you seem to be throwing away the entire Chaotix connection but still using it as a guilt indicator.I think it's b) and you're scum. Together with Scienter. The connection between you and Chaotix is too obvious to be a connection between scumbuddies. The connection between you and Scienter is much more subtle. In the previous round, you flattered me (scumtell) by saying my gut is golden, yet somehow you ended up voting God Emperor.This might work IF YOU HAD ACTUALLY SHOWN US WHAT THE CONNECTION TO SCIENTER WAS. So do that for us now Andres, please.
Are you accusing him of hypocrisy as a defensive tactic also? BOTH OF YOU DO SOMETHING NEW!Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
This is what I wanted to see from you earlier. Andres, this is a good reply, how will you respond?Yes, but when I voted for Chaotix, I put him INTO a tie, allowing an unknown tiebreaker event to possibly sudden death lynch "my partner".
You, on the other hand, have never actually placed Chaotix in any danger whatsoever.
Why are YOU getting evasive now Andres? I want to see your response to Atpg's differentiation between his connection to Chaotix and yours.Originally Posted by Andres
Up until now, you were attacking hard and saying (some) things worth listening to, whereas Atpg was generally in sarcastic and evasive mode. Atpg finally pulls out a good punch and you have nothing to say about it? This is bad.
By the way, still haven't elaborated on this subtle connection between Atpg and Scienter.
That second statement was obviously an earlier statement than the first, which he later took back in an attempt to elaborate his most current case. I don't understand why you would quote them together? To make Andres look bad and contradictory?Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
You could have pointed out that he really never made much of a case against Scienter instead...
I want to know this too. Maybe it is legit, who knows? But the only connection I can remember is that you and Atpg voted closely a round or two earlier. That is QUITE subtle indeed AndresOriginally Posted by Scienter
, can you elaborate?
I can fully understand being tired of responding to Atpg after a while, and while the post you quoted and then summarized as blah blah blah might not be deserving of anything, his earlier post about the Chaotix connection certainly was.Originally Posted by Andres
All you've seem to do is respond to Atpg's off-hand statements and weaker arguments. YOU are the one (at this stage) who has completely avoided the main point.
I mean, it's not like his post was unanswerable. When reading it, I immediately came up with a response suggesting plausible deniability. I'm just wondering why you didn't.
He did defend himself though. Why aren't you responding instead of continually attacking him now?Originally Posted by Andres
Oh god.Originally Posted by Andres
It's not unusual for Reenk to start sounding frustrated when Andres doesn't respond to the most important part of the last 30 posts and all of this bluster and banter gets thrown around.
By the way, since you seem to be implying that Atpg in a way consistent of him being mafia, I've personally seen him do the same kind of sarcasm and jokey schtick as town when he is pressured.
I do wish that instead of doing that, he gutted you for your evasion.
Bookmarks