Don't dissappear, Stuka, I'm just hounding you. You're participation is appreciated.
Vote: Robbiecon
Sounds like a good start. Also curious if anyone else can verify this force-fed-pizza thing, I have yet to be confronted with anything like this, nor have I been recruited by a cult, which really makes me feel like the fat kid during kickball.
Baby Quit Your Cryin' Put Your Clown Britches On!!!
@ Arpeg: Alright.
Enough pressure on robbiecon for now though, so why don't we vote: Romanic
Look at this opportunist scum - He would never vote me when I was voting him, and when I turn my eyes on robbie for being wormy, and someone else (DE) votes me, boom, he also votes me and without giving a proper reason.
What's your case TLD?
What's your case, Romanic? If I was scum, I'd come up with weak cases, push bandwagons that aren't chasing me or my friends and the like. Since I am town I will pressure and try to get reactions on which to build cases. Why should I OMGUS you when you are voting me? Why should I change my vote from someone who I think is worthy of lynching (talking about the GH situation D3) just because you voted for me?
You've been pressuring people all game and you've never been under real pressure yourself. Figured I'd change that and see how you react. You were also the only person with a vote on yourself right now so since robbie has two votes already you were the only person I was really able to pressure.
Didn't your mom tell you it's impolite to answer a question with another? Even worse to answer it with three.
Pressure isn't enough to vote someone, at least not to me, you need a reason to make that vote, or else you can justify a vote on any unconfirmed Townie, for pressure only, even if that player is likely, but not certainly, Town. You must have a reason to think that I am scum, otherwise pressure alone is a poor argument and your vote look indeed more opportunistic than genuinely being looking for scum.
"What's your case, Romanic?" - Why are you asking this? I've made my case clear in the two days I've voted for you. It hasn't changed, except this new vote you're placing on me, at a moment where it pushes me in the lead, without giving a reason. Again it's opportunistic and scummy.
"If I was scum ..... " - These kind of statement are also scummy. You better have a good reason to tell people why you are not scum when you do this, yet your reason here is "If I was scum, I would do weak cases, push bandwagons". Which proves nothing, and I'm pretty sure you are aware that scum don't always act the same, and try to move away from stereotypes. If you were scum, you would try to act Town. This argument is not genuine, you don't believe this or you wouldn't be voting for me today - since unlike many others, I am making cases that aren't weak, I give details, and I don't bandwagon (well once, on CB). Yet you vote for me and it's good enough to argue that you are Town. Big contradiction here.
I don't like to go out and show my hand openly, no matter if I'm town or Mafia. Why should I let my opponents know what I know at all the time? I sometomes vote people without telling them why I vote them, sometimes I just vote them to pressure them. Also, I'm not putting you in the lead, you're tied with robbiecon if I didn't make a mistake in counting.
As I stated, you haven't been pressured all game and I wanted to change that. I don't see why you have such a problem with that if you are town. You should by now have observed my playstyle to be just that. I won't say everything I think and I will just go ahead and apply pressure where I think it's necessary. Might differ from your playstyle but I won't change it because of that.
Bookmarks