Org Mobile Site
Hi ATPG, why are you flailing around for suspects? I gave a clear reason for my vote, look at monty last few posts and you can see that while they have many words, they say little.
If you want to vote someone who just says there head hurts, why not vote for riedquat?
If you want to vote someone who just says there head hurts, why not vote for riedquat?
Originally Posted by :
Jebuz my head!
Ok, ok ok... unvote; vote: scottishranger
No?
But no i stick with my vote for monty.Jebuz my head!
Ok, ok ok... unvote; vote: scottishranger
No?
Originally Posted by ATPG:
He might have voted but he's maintaining a decidedly neutral and uncontroversial stance in the game, has posted and voted, and is avoiding the spotlight.
Youv played mafia with me before. I am never in the spotlight. I always play uncontroversial until I have something to say.He might have voted but he's maintaining a decidedly neutral and uncontroversial stance in the game, has posted and voted, and is avoiding the spotlight.
Hmm sorry for double post, but just saw Monty's last post and it is interesting that he knows something about the converting process. Care to explain more for us unenlightened?
Pizza's my go-to man for info on conversion here. He's the one who claimed that all of us are corruptible, hmm?
Originally Posted by :
Hi ATPG, why are you flailing around for suspects? I gave a clear reason for my vote, look at monty last few posts and you can see that while they have many words, they say little.
Probably because we were arguing back and forth over the same points with each other?Hi ATPG, why are you flailing around for suspects? I gave a clear reason for my vote, look at monty last few posts and you can see that while they have many words, they say little.
Originally Posted by scottishranger:
Hmm sorry for double post, but just saw Monty's last post and it is interesting that he knows something about the converting process. Care to explain more for us unenlightened?
I doubt he does, I assuming he just wants to be look more trustworthy so people will reveal information to him.Hmm sorry for double post, but just saw Monty's last post and it is interesting that he knows something about the converting process. Care to explain more for us unenlightened?
Vote: Abstain
Too much back and forth for me to follow.
It's notable that if ATPG got attacked by a stake user, so we got two of them running around. That is, one or both of them might be mafia, not vigs.
Too much back and forth for me to follow.
It's notable that if ATPG got attacked by a stake user, so we got two of them running around. That is, one or both of them might be mafia, not vigs.
vote: abstain for now. I'll catch up a bit later, but I see a whole lot of nothing tbh.
Not really. Things are looking pretty interesting, and there's only really one more character I would like to be in contact with.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
Pizza's my go-to man for info on conversion here. He's the one who claimed that all of us are corruptible, hmm?
This does not make sense to me. What you said in your previous post and what ATPG has been saying about conversion doesn't mesh together.Pizza's my go-to man for info on conversion here. He's the one who claimed that all of us are corruptible, hmm?
ATPG: Everyone can be converted. Speaking from experience.
Originally Posted by :
. And I'd like to mention that converting me, if at all possible, will gain you no advantage. The process does a number on one's memory, you see.
Allowing for the possibility that Pizza is wrong. What's not to get?. And I'd like to mention that converting me, if at all possible, will gain you no advantage. The process does a number on one's memory, you see.
I'm not talking about that at all the part which I am refering to is this:
Originally Posted by :
The process does a number on one's memory, you see.
Where did you come up with this? I guess I should have pointed out the part I was talking about in my original post, sorry about that.The process does a number on one's memory, you see.
I'm not implying that conversion will have some sort of significant neurological impact on me; I'm saying that I won't rat out my former compatriots.
I mean, choose to believe it or not, but it's not something that needs to be deeply analyzed.
So
I mean, choose to believe it or not, but it's not something that needs to be deeply analyzed.
So
Originally Posted by Csargo:
I doubt he does, I assuming he just wants to be look more trustworthy so people will reveal information to him.
Thats what i think tooI doubt he does, I assuming he just wants to be look more trustworthy so people will reveal information to him.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
I'm not implying that conversion will have some sort of significant neurological impact on me; I'm saying that I won't rat out my former compatriots.
I mean, choose to believe it or not, but it's not something that needs to be deeply analyzed.
So
Are you telling that you wont use the information you have to achieve you victory conditions (if you are converted)? This is a game with conversions and what you say is hard to believe. I'm not implying that conversion will have some sort of significant neurological impact on me; I'm saying that I won't rat out my former compatriots.
I mean, choose to believe it or not, but it's not something that needs to be deeply analyzed.
So
Vote: ATPG - There is something off about all his posturing.
Originally Posted by :
Are you telling that you wont use the information you have to achieve you victory conditions (if you are converted)? This is a game with conversions and what you say is hard to believe.
Are you telling that you wont use the information you have to achieve you victory conditions (if you are converted)? This is a game with conversions and what you say is hard to believe.
Originally Posted by atheotes:
Vote: ATPG - There is something off about all his posturing.
Yeah, I'm not keen on dying, and I'll say anything to live. As opposed to my usual lynch me I don't give a hoot stance.Vote: ATPG - There is something off about all his posturing.
unvote, vote: Scottishranger
Flail this.
Flail this.
Tally
Montmorency 2 ( scottishranger, JHT)
scottishranger 6 (Lewwyn, Montmorency, Riedquat, Daveshack, Erebus, ATPG)
Atpg 3 (Kagemusha, BSmith, atheotes)
Lewwyn 3 (edse,thefluffyone93,Arjos)
Kagemusha 1 (Captain Blackadder)
thefluffyone93 1 (Seon)
Abstain 4 (Ishmael, Csargo, Ironside, Kennigit)
I might be missing 1 or 2?
Montmorency 2 ( scottishranger, JHT)
scottishranger 6 (Lewwyn, Montmorency, Riedquat, Daveshack, Erebus, ATPG)
Atpg 3 (Kagemusha, BSmith, atheotes)
Lewwyn 3 (edse,thefluffyone93,Arjos)
Kagemusha 1 (Captain Blackadder)
thefluffyone93 1 (Seon)
Abstain 4 (Ishmael, Csargo, Ironside, Kennigit)
I might be missing 1 or 2?
The inthread case on Scottishranger is weak...maybe i am missing some insider info. There seems to be a vote-block formed from behind the scenes dealings. 
Montmorency: You have scottishranger voting for himself - it is probably ATPG's vote on him
Montmorency: You have scottishranger voting for himself - it is probably ATPG's vote on him
There is no case, only certain considerations. Town politics can get ugly. You need to be very utilitarian.
Originally Posted by atheotes:
The inthread case on Scottishranger is weak...maybe i am missing some insider info. There seems to be a vote-block formed from behind the scenes dealings.
Actually, the behind the scenes dealings threatened that there would be no vote bloc at all. Monty's diplomatic skills need polishing.The inthread case on Scottishranger is weak...maybe i am missing some insider info. There seems to be a vote-block formed from behind the scenes dealings.
It is only because Monty and Lewwyn reversed on me and eased up on their harsh anti-neutral and anti-pizza stance that I've agreed to move my vote for now.
Originally Posted by :
Monty's diplomatic skills need polishing.
Eh.Monty's diplomatic skills need polishing.
Originally Posted by :
Montmorency: You have scottishranger voting for himself - it is probably ATPG's vote on him
Right.Montmorency: You have scottishranger voting for himself - it is probably ATPG's vote on him
desertoth@yahoo.com
I need the Slayers to contact me via email, to maintain their anonymity, but to convey important information.
Use this email address instead of askthepizzaguy at yahoo. I might miss it in my giant pile of stuff, so use the alternate address.
I need the Slayers to contact me via email, to maintain their anonymity, but to convey important information.
Use this email address instead of askthepizzaguy at yahoo. I might miss it in my giant pile of stuff, so use the alternate address.
So now you want people to reveal to you?
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy:
Actually, the behind the scenes dealings threatened that there would be no vote bloc at all. Monty's diplomatic skills need polishing.
It is only because Monty and Lewwyn reversed on me and eased up on their harsh anti-neutral and anti-pizza stance that I've agreed to move my vote for now.
thats a bloc of 3 Actually, the behind the scenes dealings threatened that there would be no vote bloc at all. Monty's diplomatic skills need polishing.
It is only because Monty and Lewwyn reversed on me and eased up on their harsh anti-neutral and anti-pizza stance that I've agreed to move my vote for now.
Originally Posted by Csargo:
So now you want people to reveal to you?
Come on Csargo, vote for pizza and lets see if he keeps his word So now you want people to reveal to you?
I would if I thought it would do any good.
Originally Posted by Csargo:
So now you want people to reveal to you?
No.... this would be for the positive collaboration aspect, without the negative "I know who you are" aspect.So now you want people to reveal to you?
I'm surprised no one thought of this before. This is actually pretty safe.
Originally Posted by Csargo:
I would if I thought it would do any good.
we will atleast know if he will keep his word I would if I thought it would do any good.
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy:
No.... this would be for the positive collaboration aspect, without the negative "I know who you are" aspect.
I'm surprised no one thought of this before. This is actually pretty safe.
what if multiple people claim?No.... this would be for the positive collaboration aspect, without the negative "I know who you are" aspect.
I'm surprised no one thought of this before. This is actually pretty safe.
Originally Posted by :
what if multiple people claim?
Have them attack each other. what if multiple people claim?
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy:
desertoth@yahoo.com
I need the Slayers to contact me via email, to maintain their anonymity, but to convey important information.
Use this email address instead of askthepizzaguy at yahoo. I might miss it in my giant pile of stuff, so use the alternate address.
Who died and made you Elvis?desertoth@yahoo.com
I need the Slayers to contact me via email, to maintain their anonymity, but to convey important information.
Use this email address instead of askthepizzaguy at yahoo. I might miss it in my giant pile of stuff, so use the alternate address.
Also whilst this form of reveal may be the best for the town I find it unsporting to do it in such a fashion and I believe it is outside the rules of what I think is fair play.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
Have them attack each other.
Eh? How? All they would be anonymous... won't they? Have them attack each other.
Ohoho, that's just why it's so funny! 
?
?
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO