Page 2 of 3 First 12 3 Last

You should have said it better! In fact I thought about reporting you for a personal attack but I preferred to discuss the matter openly.
My point is not about what you believe and what not, that's irrelevant.
My point is that you and I and others say socialism is needed because otherwise we end up with an underclass etc.
Then a guy from a poor, oppressed country comes along and discusses with us and the "compassionate" people tell him to bugger off because he does not suite their sensibilities in terms of language. So much about showing that compassion...
You made it even worse by insulting him, the whole suspicion of being a troll is rubbish, I've trolled numerous times here and people responded seriously to it, most people couldn't smell a troll when he's breathing down their neck. And then label some poor guy a troll because his english isn't up to their standard. Yeah well, if education were as good everywhere as it is in the west, then a lot of problems wouldn't exist in the first place.
And instead of offering help your solution is to tell him to bugger off. I find that lazy and selfish because you expect someone from a less developed part of the world to fit western standards or go away. It's not helping anyone. Also for a society that claims to be oh so open it's an incredibly closed attitude.

It's also sad that every second thing on the internet is considered a fraud or a troll or not honest in some way, says something about how fake people really are...
I know, I just said I trolled sometimes.... Maybe I played devil's advocate sometimes would be more appropriate.

I know that my country is superior, don't worry, I was just saying your argument is not working well if your behaviour contradicts your words.

Reply

Western socialism is basically a pay-more-to-get-more kind of system. I just came back from a quick foray into Canada (literally, walked into my house an hour ago after spending a night in Niagara Falls). Anyway, first thing that struck me in Canada: roads. They're quite awesome, excellent condition, high quality paving, you can tell that roads are well maintained. For the record, roads in Michigan are utter shit.
Anyway, my awe at the Canadian roads was dispelled by two things:
1. Low speed limits coupled with cops mercilessly enforcing those speed limits. I of course stayed out of trouble and moved with packs of Canadian cars, but still, roadsides were littered with flashing sirens and stopped drivers with long faces (most of them Americans). Oh, and every 10 miles or so there as a threatening sign: "50 km over the speed limit is a $10000 fine." Didn't like that, not one bit.
2. On my trip back I stopped to fill up my gas tank, pulled up to the gas station and looked at the price $2.12! Wow GREAT! I thought until it hit me a second later....that's $2.12 per LITER, not Gallon. 2 bucks for a frikken liter? That's crazy, man, just totally insane.

About 5 miles into Michigan the road got so bumpy that my daughter who was sleeping in the back seat woke up: "Daddy, this is Michigan, right?" Yeah, it's Michigan alright.

/rant off

Reply

sounds like belgian roads to me.

Reply

Look the fella talks about zionist plots an the New World Order etc on another thread.

Basically I aint gonna be the one to feed the proverbial.

Reply

You're right, the level of nonsense is off the charts.

Reply

the biochip NWO smartcard plot is my fav on page 5 of the Syria thread

Reply

In fairness one of my friends got a little bit into his conspiracies and mocking combined with serious talking seemed to mostly snap him out of it...

Reply

That's another thread as you say yourself. I said in other threads that the zionist thing is pretty crazy and that people ignore him because of it.
What I don't like to see is people insulting him and then everybody piles up to make him leave. If you think his point is crazy, just say it.
Labelling people as outcasts doesn't help a lot. We've had others who posted pretty crazy ideas for most of the other posters but fit in relatively well now.

LittleGrizzly has a relatively healthy attitude to the topic IMO. Don't hesitate to call an idea crazy but just the mocking part doesn't do it.
You can't just turn someone into a mocking pinata because you think his ideas are crazy and he hasn't been taught oxford english.

Reply

What I don't like to see is people insulting him and then everybody piles up to make him leave. If you think his point is crazy, just say it.
Labelling people as outcasts doesn't help a lot. We've had others who posted pretty crazy ideas for most of the other posters but fit in relatively well now.
........................................................................

Exactly!

Engage and debate, his ideas are out there but I think some of the interesting characters on here can be people with pretty far out ideas. If someone proves themselves to be a zealot on every topic who will not listen to reason then by all means ignore them but as an example on the Scottish independance topic he wrote a post that was pretty out there and Rhyfelwyr corrected him on some mistakes he has made an in adult manner and if required will provide supporting evidence...

Empire has not come back and called him a liar, he has not ignored him and just rewrote what he previously wrote, maybe he has learned some new information and advanced his knowledge and understanding...

I came to the .org backroom as a stupid angry teenager with terrible English who to an extent thought he had the answers to everything. That may be overstating it (back me up here ) but it is certainly true to an extent. Were it not for people showing me the error of my ways and leading by their own example I probably would not have changed much as it is I think I have changed a lot for the better...

If nothing else interacting on these boards will help him develop his English.

Right now sorry for talking about you as if you are not here Empire, I enjoy having a variety of different viewpoints and I hope you stick around to give us yours I have no problem with you struggling with English as your probably speak and write your native language better than the majority of us (a fair few of us don't even speak a second language myself included) just try to keep an open mind and remember no matter how much you now about a variety of subjects there is always someone out there who knows more than you (or me) and these are people we should listen to (even if the conclusion they take from these facts are the wrong ones)

One little piece of advice though don't play around with the font sizes and colours on your writing too much as it is almost the equivalent of writing in all caps it looks more noticeable but the content of your post is taken less seriously, use it very sparingly for full effect.

Reply

I'm with LittleGrizzly on this. Much of the reason I like this place is that it provides a place to discuss, and be educated about stuff, most people could either careless about or cannot approach w/o completely going off the rails.
Here, you can be completely wrong and still get a coherent and often helpful reply.

Reply

...my sensibilities in terms of language amplify my feeling of disdane against him, they are in no way the lynchpin. What I can't read I can only judge on presentation, multiple exclamation points and an over use of the caps lock does not leave a good impression. From the parts I can read of his posts, I find him supremely ignorant and occasionally offensive, the combination of this and his presentation I assume poe's law.

Make no mistake this is not a spontanious thing, I am reacting to about a month of his posting, not just that one post.

I prefer socialistic government, that does not require me to suffer fools gladly. Our knowledge of his circumstances are reliant on his word, for all we know he's a 12 yr old american looking for laughs or he might be actually be a kurdish man under the foot of tyrrany, or anything between, either way he's acting like a jackass here and I've noticed a trend on this forum that after a long period of obtusiveness most who act as he does either end up improving or they leave, I wish he would make that decision quickly and save us some grief.


Why? I was unaware that my posts on socialism contained a tangent on forum etiquette, that to talk about socialism I was supposed to extend compassion at all times to some random man on the internet who says he's kurdish, even when he is being a fool. His nationality does not influence my opinion of the quality of a person and right now he's making a mockery out of himself, I'd advise he do something about it.

Reply

I already said i just ignore him am I not allowed to ignore a comment

Basically why do i have to react to anything anyone says I thought I was giving good advice to Greyblades.

Reply

Sorry for missing this post before. Of course, the term 'socialism' is used in different ways - but generally speaking, when discussing 'socialism' as an economic model, it has the meaning that you gave it in your last line - social ownership of the means of production. When discussing it in this sense, it is something else entirely from the particular policies of socialist parties. Concepts like the minimum wage and welfare are not in accordance with the socialist model. I guess socialists might argue that they are temporary relief measures. Which is fair enough.

Anyway, I maintain that I have not misrepresented anything, and we seem to agree that the sense in which I discussed socialism was appropriate. But now, I will accuse you of misrepresenting things! Because contrary to your notions of social ownership distinct from the state, such ideas have been very much on the fringe of socialism. State ownership is the norm in socialist theory - not because it happens to be one of many options, but because the acquisition of the means of production by an institution invested with all the powers of government is deemed necessary for their redistribution. It is for this reason that ownership by the state in particular is regarded as a necessary consequence of socialist theory.

Yes but the need for that hierarchy is created by the fact that they reduce the vast majority of employees to a form of labour that is so isolated from the production process. So it actually cripples any organizational capacity that these employees could have. When this happens, naturally they need managers to coordinate the production process.

The problems of such a system are manifold - there is a disconnect between the labourer and the organization of labour, the suppression of everything a worker could contribute to the running of the business by reducing him to petty and repetitive tasks, the creation of a managerial class that benefits more from promoting its own significance (red tape etc) rather than the actual profit of the business, the low morale of the worker who has no stake in the business, the hostility that naturally breeds between worker and manager etc.

Reply

I blame the parents you know.

Reply

Reply

That's highly Leninist of you, Rhy.

Just because everyone who supported other forms have been shot does not mean they never existed or had an influence on socialist theory.

CNT-FAI, for example, never called for government ownership, at least not in our traditional understanding of the term "government". And they had 500.000 members before Stalin shot 'em, hardly "a fringe".

Reply

Marxist analysis has become particularly significant recently. The great contradiction in capitalism, as Marx saw it, was the need for the capitalist class to reduce costs and maximise profits, while at the same time relying on the same working class they impoverish to spend money and increase their wealth.

These working class run out of money and capitalism stalls. Marx stated that capitalism was endlessly creative in maintaining itself. In the context of the last few years we can see that the latest creativity came in the form of cheap high risk credit. Sub prime mortgages anyone?

So the poor have been squeezed dry and governments are bankrupt. All the while the world's largest companies are sitting on record cash reserves while simultaneously cutting costs... Spot on so far Karl.

Reply

You don't and I read that differently, my apologies if I misunderstood.

I don't know poe's law but your own impatience with others and their faults is no reason to insult them.

In that case you should have seen that he tried to improve his style already after we made him aware of how bad it looks. It was a small step but you don't conquer Russia in a day or how they say.

Again, you're just impatient, make assumptions and you insulted him, that's what jackasses do. If you have such a problem with his posts you can put him on ignore and if they're actually offensive you can report them. You explain this as though he forced you to insult him.

Well, now you're aware that I judge your words by your personal attitude. So if you talk about fairness and equality and then jump on someone who may not have had the fortunate upbringing we had, your points about fairness and equality are harder to take as sincere.
How can you judge whether he is a fool or not when you say you can hardly understand what he is trying to say? Maybe it's just a language problem. I only brought up nationality because I would think English and how not to believe propaganda are probably not the prime educational goals in Iran and I would never deny that my education and my surroundings had a strong influence on my world view, do you? His education and surroundings are very different from ours so it doesn't surprise me that he has very different views. I'm more surprised that you find it so shocking...

I don't think anyone disagrees with this part but you still can't expect someone to change completely within a day or a month.

Reply

The problem is that global workers, from the U.S. to Myanmar, are becoming obsolete after entering the global economy at an unprecedented rate due to an expansion of access to the internet. As jobs in need of human effort go away at an exponential rate and are replaced by new jobs at an arithmetic rate and the amount of people entering the market surges - this will have a catastrophic effect on wages in the developed world and will offer benefits abroad only for a short period of time.

The affluent have figured out a way to generate their own consumption demand not by creating demand in lower classes through the capitalist economy, as had been the means to feed slaves, serfs and commoners for centuries, but by consuming more on their own and producing to that demand using artificial labor. This shift has not created new jobs as the industrial revolution did. As resources become less numerous and the affluent become wealthier, this inertia will continue to build in this direction. It is imperative that lower classes have the means to violently destabilize the security of the affluent. They are losing economic power and must create a counterbalance to this in order to prevent abuse through force and free advanced education. This is literally the only way to avoid the annihilation of the underclasses.

Technology now allows massive population control and destruction. The only reason that civil disobedience or union strikes have worked is because they had traditionally put the economy into a standstill and harmed the affluent as a result. If the lower classes are no longer capable of affecting the economy, they will have no jobs to strike from and their disobedience will not disrupt status quo as they can be dealt with without destabilizing the lives of the people who matter. We are reaching a tipping point in the power of people through words. I'm not encouraging violence, but I am encouraging the lower classes access to an insidious destructive means in order to ensure that this natural and growing temptation for the upper classes is avoided. A cultural "nuclear deterrent". People must be trained and capable of destabilizing those who would destroy or indenture them. If people fail to deter this destructive evolution, there will be no use for them as slaves as there was hundreds of years ago, as technology will do what humans are incapable of doing. When people cannot even be used as slaves, their lives will be viewed as truly meaningless.

Additionally to the need for force resistance, a new use for human beings that are incapable of working at the speed of machines must be developed, as it was in the industrial age. This will not happen on its own unless people realize what the alternative is.

This is not an argument for socialism or for violence, but it is an argument for radical republicanism and civilian access to more serious firepower and education than we currently have access to. The powerful have always desired the destruction of resource competing masses, but have suffered them as they were needed them for their own prosperity. Woe to us when they don't need us anymore.

Reply

Poe's law: without clear indication of parody the most extreme of parody can be nigh indistinguishable from reality. Basically, I was inclined to think he's a troll, as I assume that someone cant be as ignorant or offensive without being intentionally so.


Actually, I saw no attempts to improve his style until after the offending post. You dont conquer russia at all if you dont take the first step.

A jackass would not even entertain the idea that he was a sincere, and a jackass would have continued the insults after being chastised for it.

I generally dont ignore anyone as a rule, if they are truely worth ignoring they will be banned in time, if they arent that generally means they are here to discuss things and while the majority of thier posts may be inane or pointless there is the chance that they will say something worthy of note (still waiting on AVG, but ICSD and Fragony have born some fruit) and it is to my detriment alone if I do not see it due to an ignore.
Emperor appeared to be on the way to a ban and I had spent about a month avoiding dealing with him until he directly addressed me, and I said what I did: Shape up or leave and spare us the drama of making the choice all the others make. Time will tell if he takes it to heart but it needed to be said, I only apologise for my lack of tact in saying it.

If I was unfair I would have jumped on him for his upbringing, his heritage or some other factor outside of his control. But instead I attacked his behaviour on the forum which has been disgraceful. Equality? I gave him the same consideration I give everone else when he first appeared, he acted a fool, so I treated him like everyone else who acts a fool out of the gate.

If it is, it's a pretty bad language problem, he was going on about the freemason conspiracies two week ago.
I'm starting to think most of the stuff I thought I couldnt understand was more due to not believeing what I was reading was real than a language barrier.

Again, I didnt expect much but I got nothing. Still waiting to see if his recent efforts stick.

Reply

So you also make fun of people whose education was worse because their parents couldn't afford to send them to a private school?
And you insult disabled people for not being like everyone else? IMO not everyone is equal and as such not everyone can be held to the same standard. Treating people equally can also mean that one expects people to make the best out of the options they were given in life, not that everyone is held to exactly the same standard. Can't be applied everywhere but life is complex.

You don't have an open mind. Don't let your disbelief colour your opinion and retard your reading skills. His opinion does not affect you, there is no reason to get worked up or angry.

So far it seems like your effort to keep the Backroom a bland and boring place is showing results.

Who says what needs to be said and what does not? I disagree that this needed to be said. Just because someone does not share your world view you do not get the right to silence them. Freedom of speech.

Reply

Where did you get that from? I chastised him for what he says, I have said nothing about his circumstances let alone "made fun" of them.
I have not done anything that would indicate such and I find you implying such insuling.
Again: If I was unfair I would have jumped on him for his upbringing, his heritage or some other factor outside of his control. But instead I attacked his behaviour on the forum which has been disgraceful.
I dont attack people for what they cant be held responsible for, but dont tell me that his behavior is out of his own control.

Accusations of a closed mind, of harrassing the disabled and the uneducated? I actually think it is actually you who is worked up and angry here.


If you say so. Call me crazy but I dont consider Ban-bait interesting.


...Where are you getting this from? I told him to improve or leave, I have made no effort to enforce it and I hope that he will improve, but if someone didnt say it, he was not going to change, had that happened he would have been silenced anyway by the moderators, probably after the usual internet drama that could have incited other people into leaving in disgust.

Reply

Thinking that freemasons/zionists/whatever might be controlling the world behind the scenes is proof of a closed mind, not an open one.

A mind completely closed to reason and logic. Because it simply doesn't get any more retarded than thinking a shadowy clique of evil men run everything. Quickly disregarding such nonsense is proof of a mind open to real reasons for why the world is as it is.


Having said that, I am still unsure on whether I want to talk some sense in the the NWO-believers or not. I mean, they're simply hilarious. Why would I want to lose an excellent source of fun?

Reply

The opinion of a person is not entirely in their control, no. It is to an extent but if you told me to seriously believe in Jedi and the force today I couldn't just do it, could you? Could you arrange it within a month? Do you think being born in the western world, being taught by parents and teachers who held certain beliefs etc. had no impact on your opinions at all and you formed them all completely independently? If you ever changed your opinion on something fundamental, how long did it take? How often did you discuss someone and they immediately accepted all your points after they held the opposite opinion before?

Nah, no such accusations, I'm calm. I was just wondering why seemingly insult someone so harshly for having a weird opinion which may not entirely be his own fault but not others for things that may not be in their control.

The way you phrased it it sounded a lot more aggressive and more like you just told him that he's dumb and you want him to leave.
Maybe work on your delivery then.

Do you approach your children in class in the same way if they hold some weird belief that e.g. their parents taught them?
Or are all your children perfect in Norway? You're usually the guy who says most of our behavior and beliefs are a result of our circumstances and we don't even know Medya's circumstances, upbringing and education so I would expect there is a reason he believes that and he can be talked out of it. You're absolutely right about the closed mind and if he just leaves because we don't accept his "message" then yes, he has a closed mind and wants to keep it that way.

We've been discussing gun control with certain members here for years now but I haven't seen anyone tell the other side to stop being stupid or leave. It's a different issue but it's not like there has been a huge change of opinions going on either.

Reply

A long time, I still needed alot of pushing and it seemed Emperor wasnt getting one.


Because I was half under the impression of a troll, and my patience was stretched thin what with the seemingly simultanious return of totalrelism and AVG around the same time he showed up. I am sorry about the insinuations about stupidity but the kid (I think?) needed a push in the right direction.

Reply

Writing about how zionists control the world is a sure way of getting a zero, yes.



But no, I do approach children and adults differently. And the children in my class address me differently as well, and because of that your point is moot.

Reply

I wonder about Fragony's bicycles. I can't imagine they receive the same care and maintenance that bicycles in places where private property is respected receive. It seems there would be less incentive to acquire a quality bike. On the surface it sounds great they we're all out here sharing our rides together. But in retrospect we're tooling around on low quality, maintenance lacking hunks of junk. Super, let's transfer that program to all aspects of our lives.

Perhaps the most capitalistic thing we have is insurance. We bet against ourselves, as some random guy with money bets in our favor, with odds HIGHLY on his side. How many people here with responsibilities are ready and willing to give up their insurance? Does insurance not exist in socialist communities? Er, is there a successful socialist community in the world today?

Reply

Pretty much the top ten countries are in the majority socialist democracies with universal health care.

The reason New Zealand has so many high risk adventure sports is that it has universal health care and accident insurance for everyone. Doesn't mean they don't look after themselves or get additional insurance. It just means tourists can enjoy adventurous attractions and locals of all monetary incomes can enjoy rigorous sports and occupations without penalty.

Reply

Sorry to be off topic, but who is AVG?

Reply

"Er, is there a successful socialist community in the world today?" : Er, is there a successful capitalist community in the world today?. There, fixed for you.

Reply

Page 2 of 3 First 12 3 Last