El Barto's Clueless Mafia Game #1

[Ishmael]

I personally would like to see how they interact today, if TFT is going to back up his accusation of Ishmael and how Ishmael reacts.

Since you ask, I've actually reversed my position on TFT. His accusations against me in the previous day phase seemed sincere.

That leaves me with nothing, so I'll fall back to the default option of trying to get people to talk more. Jarema and edse haven't said much, but a vote for Jarema is more likely to do something given he's already got one.

vote: Jarema

Don't feel limited by Visor; thoughts on anybody are appreciated .

[Askthepizzaguy]

If Jarema is scum, Ishmael looks good.

If not, Ishmael and reidquat for the scum duo.

[Visor]

@El Barto

What happens if Bladescape doesn't post/vote today?

Hearing from edse would be good as well, need to hear from everybody, with a short game.

[Ishmael]

I'm inclining more and more towards ATPG being scum. I dislike such certainty so early.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'm inclining more and more towards ATPG being scum. I dislike such certainty so early.

I dislike prevarication. This isn't early, we're at lynch or lose next round.

6 towns, two scums. -1 town lynch, -1 town murder.

4 towns, two scums. Lynch or lose.

"Early" pushes you over the top. We can lynch your partner scumquat next round.

Unvote, Vote: Ishmael

I've clearly rattled your cage. Time to die.

[Ishmael]

I dislike prevarication. This isn't early, we're at lynch or lose next round.

6 towns, two scums. -1 town lynch, -1 town murder.

4 towns, two scums. Lynch or lose.

"Early" pushes you over the top. We can lynch your partner scumquat next round.

Unvote, Vote: Ishmael

I've clearly rattled your cage. Time to die.

There is a difference between disliking certainty, and disliking taking a position. My objection was to your framing the debate in an attempt to guarantee that if Jarema were innocent, you would get a 'free' lynch. As you point out yourself, that would be game.

unvote; vote: Askthepizzaguy

[Riedquat]

There is a difference between disliking certainty, and disliking taking a position. My objection was to your framing the debate in an attempt to guarantee that if Jarema were innocent, you would get a 'free' lynch. As you point out yourself, that would be game.

unvote; vote: Askthepizzaguy

This post smells funny... I somehow agree with it but something doesn't fit...
Atpg, as Ishmael kindly points out, if jarema is innocent, why Ishmael and me are guilty? And just as mental exercise, if is not me, who would be the next possible?

[Riedquat]

I'm inclining more and more towards ATPG being scum. I dislike such certainty so early.

Or visor and him... +10 for thread activity but they are directing the circus here... in the other hand atpg could be right about you, the thing is you and who else?

[Riedquat]

If Jarema is scum, Ishmael looks good.

If not, Ishmael and reidquat for the scum duo.

You can be partially right, just remove the poor reidquat from there, were me scum you would be dead. You alive, me good townie, a townquat! ...*possessed by Sitting Bull spirit*...

[Askthepizzaguy]

You can be partially right, just remove the poor reidquat from there, were me scum you would be dead.

This is a bad argument. Zack was the must-murder last night, he was never getting lynched this game due to the lack of village PMs.

That being said, you can help me kill Ishmael and all will be forgiven.

[Riedquat]

This is a bad argument. Zack was the must-murder last night, he was never getting lynched this game due to the lack of village PMs.

That being said, you can help me kill Ishmael and all will be forgiven.

I prefer to lynch not kill Ishmael... and what are you going to forgive?