Quote Originally Posted by Gilrandir
Doesn't matter. Wherever it is - just ship'em back.
And yet one of the oft-cited dilemmas regarding the admission of refugees is that 'we don't know where they are coming from'.

Once again, the most reasonable solution seems to be the colonization of Neo-Prussia.

Quote Originally Posted by Viking
Generally speaking, most social upheaval tends to come from the younger generations, not the older ones. With a decreasing younger fraction of the population, the country could just as well become more stable.
Another disconnected generalization without regard for causality. Generally speaking, the old have been far too infirm and far too few in number to even constitute a distinct demographic in the first place.

If you want anecdotes, look to the readiness of "senior citizens" to march and gather in protest in the United States and Japan on conservative planks and for self-advocacy.

Quote Originally Posted by Beskar
Do people not realise that 'immigrants' are actually people?
If we are prepared to embark on a full program of integration, then let us do so - swiftly, much more so than now. If we are holding most asylum seekers temporarily, then closed internment camps are the most effective and humane way of both accounting for the population and providing for/ensuring access to vital goods and services. The quality of conditions under internment obviously depends on funding levels and protocol and oversight in place; we must recognize the difference between conditionally (i.e. 'don't run off') housing asylum seekers in facilities well-provided with heating, food, water, medicine, books, and communications equipment and any of the abusive examples readily citable from modern history.