Snowhobbit, I am going to be honest with you here.

Your "Questions" are not questions. They are an means of you to avoid accountability and trying to justify your use of personal attacks against other members. You then bring up a case of Gaius, something that has not been reported previously to start with, and I am spending significantly more time trying to find this than I should, and still haven't found it.

So I am taking the decision to no longer continue with your 'goose chases', and it is clear that your goal with this thread is not to have any answers, but to what is termed over as here "arguing the toss", which means you are arguing for the sake of arguing, as urban dictionary describes it: An idiom meaning to stubbornly quibble over something inconsequential, irrelevant, minor or off-topic.This is something you have done on many occasions, and it is something I don't have to concern myself with.

This thread falls under the above definition, and my future interactions with you will be based on whether or not I deem a further response as necessary.

TL:DR I am unable to defend my views on racism in public for fear of how people would think of me.
Or is it a moderator-exclusive privilege to misrepresent people using TL:DR?

So to be clear, it is horrible to question people due to their inability to draw fairly simple conclusions/their persistance in drawing completely wrong conclusions but it is not questionable to call people racist in the esteemed view of the honourable not-at-all-questionable-views-on-racism Beskar, and therefore it does not need to be explained why one of the two is ok but not the other?

I do not consider accusations of racism, or racism, to be inconsequential, but if you do that would certainly explain why you think it is ok.

There is a difference between calling someone a racist and calling someone stupid. You can stop being a racist from one minute to the next but you can't become more intelligent just because you want to.

People have been called racist here long before Beskar moderated the Backroom and just because you don't like being called something that does not mean it has to be against the rules. We've had cases before of people who didn't like to be called racists even though a lot of people thought that it was objectively the case that they made racist statements.

If you can prove that Lizardo stuck Crayons up his nose, maybe you can have an argument about whether your own questions were justified.
Even if Gaius had no good reason to say you hate black people, neither did you for insinuating that he beats his wife -> you started it -> cry me a river...

Is being unable to understand chronology a issue unique to you, or is it more widespread? As for who asked what first, I suggest you check these things called time stamps on the posts. They might clue you in to when you are lying to make a point. Are classical philosophical questions not included in German education?

Since I have not made racist statements, I presume that it is then ok if I follow you on the forum and call you a Nazi, with no proof for the claim? Or shall we play selectively applied rules again?

Prove your accusation and link to the relevant posts. Otherwise I'll assume you don't know the exact timestamps any better than I do and try to distract from you being an ass in most of the discussions you enter by insulting my intelligence.
I will gladly admit that my memory is off if you link to the relevant posts and my chronology turns out to be wrong.

Otherwise, cry me a river...

What is with admin people always asking me to link them to things that I cannot access? Do you walk around telling people in wheelchairs to run marathons?

You can easily go to the thread or search Gaius posts to see that you are lying.

Meanwhile please explain why you support gassing of Jews as a final solution Husar.

Snow hobbit you're becoming ridiculous now, if someone calls you racist for nothing cal him an asshole plain and simple don't pay attention now you're using these dirty tactics saying Husar is a Nazi Jew hater. Please stop whinging and whining

So you admit that you have no idea when the posts were actually made and have no facts to back up your accusation that my memory is wrong?
So maybe you're the one lying, the next quote is a good example of how you like to just make things up:

Yeah, right...

What is it that you don't have access to? The Backroom is public now, members and non-members can view the threads.