Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

[Viking_Wårlord]

And an entire germanic voicemod and name list based on ... nothing at all. Both the germanic and lusitanian language stuff were based on reconstructions from languages we do know about and were related. We cannot do the same for the Thracian/Dacian as, as you said, it is a dead branch of indo-european.

Foot

The germanic words aren't based on 'nothing at all', you based it on the swabian and Frisian dialects wich are both part of the western and northern branches of Germanic languages.

[blitzkrieg80]

The germanic words aren't based on 'nothing at all', you based it on the swabian and Frisian dialects wich are both part of the western and northern branches of Germanic languages.

This is wrong is so many ways. You simply don't know what you're talking about... or do you care to name the title of the pieces you're talking about... what manuscript? where is 'Frisian' coming from in reference to EB, anyways? Tellos and Tank are the closest thing to Frisian we've been using as resources [no offense guys, i mean Friesland as a whole not any particular modern geography]

Pre-Germanic Indo-European [timeline at EB start] has nothing to do with Old Frisian [400-1200CE] or Old High German [400-830CE] dialects other than being related through Germanic (like English), both being part of the Northwest [200-400CE], then West Germanic dialect family... quite a bit different than 270BCE!

Elmetiacos, you also do not know what you're talking about. My reconstructions are in no way 'easy' or based on derivations alone or artificial constructions as implied, as a IE translation of a fable would be, but are in-fact based on true terminology in most all instances, with actual usage historically and contextually consistent across all major dialects of Germanic and cross-IE cognates.

[Megas Methuselah]

Elmetiacos, you also do not know what you're talking about. My reconstructions are in no way 'easy' or based on derivations alone or artificial constructions as implied, as a IE translation of a fable would be, but are in-fact based on true terminology in most all instances, with actual usage historically and contextually consistent across all major dialects of Germanic and cross-IE cognates.

Which is one reason as to why EB is so great. It's spectacular effort on linguistic details never ceases to amaze me.

[Viking_Wårlord]

This is wrong is so many ways. You simply don't know what you're talking about... or do you care to name the title of the pieces you're talking about... what manuscript? where is 'Frisian' coming from in reference to EB, anyways? Tellos and Tank are the closest thing to Frisian we've been using as resources [no offense guys, i mean Friesland as a whole not any particular modern geography]

Pre-Germanic Indo-European [timeline at EB start] has nothing to do with Old Frisian [400-1200CE] or Old High German [400-830CE] dialects other than being related through Germanic (like English), both being part of the Northwest [200-400CE], then West Germanic dialect family... quite a bit different than 270BCE!

Elmetiacos, you also do not know what you're talking about. My reconstructions are in no way 'easy' or based on derivations alone or artificial constructions as implied, as a IE translation of a fable would be, but are in-fact based on true terminology in most all instances, with actual usage historically and contextually consistent across all major dialects of Germanic and cross-IE cognates.

False once more,
I'm talking about Pre Roman Frisian,that can gave birth to Swabian,Jutish,Saxon and of course old frisian dialects.
Pre Roman Frisian has been studied as one of the oldest indo-european languages with lithuanian...
I know co's I've been working on it lately!

Old frisian evoluated as New migrations of eastern Germanic tribes entered the Netherlandic area...
These eastern tribes entered in contact with early to wich they gave words such as Флагa(Flaga=flag)
or братство(Brastvo=brotherhood)...

[blitzkrieg80]

Which is one reason as to why EB is so great. It's spectacular effort on linguistic details never ceases to amaze me.

we appreciate the comment. of course there are so many gifted members in non-Germanic specialties that I am likewise amazed all the time
__________________

Viking_Warlord, care to offer any evidence other than the fantastic claims made just now with no reference, which isn't even listed anywhere in the field of study, nonetheless on the unsolicited OT links you posted from Wikipedia? you still haven't supplied a single scrap of evidence of what you're talking about other than some speculation on Dutch having retention of ancient Germanic elements... which end up being IE elements... I agree that Dutch is a very interesting language and so are its parent familial dialects, for the same reasons.

Just to be clear, you're suggesting 'Frisian' existed as the master-language of Lowland Germany / Netherlands (neglecting the standardized designation of 'West Germanic') but even so, earlier than Late Antiquity and during Classical times?

Are you referring to 'Old Franconian' or postulated term 'Ingaevonic' aka Anglo-Frisian? Again, what is your point and what is your evidence?

False once more,

what do you mean by 'false once more' - care to explain this? you imply an occasion beyond the recent post.

FYI - I am hardly 'false' when I know where I got my material. do you honestly think you know what sources I used better than I? If you want to prove this wrong, give us some literary evidence that I unknowingly used information from an Old Franconian or Old Frisian manuscript... that would be helpful in making such a point.

[blitzkrieg80]

I know co's I've been working on it lately!

disagreement aside - this sounds very interesting. it would be awesome to hear what work you've been doing in such a lesser known but important field, so please share sometime... as a separate item, since i don't expect a good mood to come from the other discussion.

[Ayce]

Just stopping by to say hi after a an absence (since August).
For the Getai, using either Latin or Greek is recommended, however, and I know this isn't likely be accepted because it isn't official, after looking through Dan Romalo's analysis of the largely neglected Sinaia lead tablets (found here), I am convinced that they are not forgeries as initially supposed (they show a natural evolving language, and the method of production fits the time period), actually I think they were classified as forgeries because it seemed too good to be true. I have managed to reconstruct more than half of the building names, using the vocabulary and basic grammar (this, could be „Skyteo do Ǧino”, instead of „Skyteo do Oto” there), but haven't been able to do anything about troops, because the terms used when referring to armies is too general (no soldier's descriptions), my recommendations for „getification” being Mezenai -> Mezeni (sg. Mezeno/Mezena, pl. Mezeni)*, Nobali(noble)/Dogyi(hat-wearers) for Tarabostes, and Boičeri for Ktistai, again using basic grammar.
*I'd also put Komatai -> Komati, but in the texts, the full term only appears in another context (it does appear as a single word though). It would come from Ko + Mato meaning „with mastery”, aka free people that have a job qualification (be it blacksmith, warrior, carpenter, or whatever).

[Viking_Wårlord]

disagreement aside - this sounds very interesting. it would be awesome to hear what work you've been doing in such a lesser known but important field, so please share sometime... as a separate item, since i don't expect a good mood to come from the other discussion.

Well, I've been making a B.I.G project last year that was to search for similarities in all indo-european languages and so it bought me to learn new languages(as russian and Hindi)...Through my studies I've found Lithuanian to be the closest to Hindi hence more 'ancient' than any other indo-european language...
As my speciality is Germanic languages(I think you've guessed that I'm Danish),I wanted to compare ALL actual and ancient dialects...I've found surprising things really,for example,Gothic(wich is a dead language) had a lot of remnants of Biblic hebrew(wich can be explained by the Goths having converted to Arianism)!
Pre-Roman Frisian was the most oldest of all,so old that we're still speculating on the meaning of some words coming from it!
How did I find out?
By comparing Pre-roman Frisian(or Proto-Germanic if you like) to Lithuanian and to Hindi(wich are the most ancient indo-european languages).

[blitzkrieg80]

i see what the confusion lies in... you're calling / equating West Germanic or even Anglo-Frisian the same as Proto-Germanic, despite accepted usage? they are subfamilies, so that doesn't make a lot of sense. what does make a lot of sense is otherwise Proto-Germanic seems to include two dialects (Northwest and East) which are becoming divergent from the beginning on and is more or less not very useful as a designation, so I find it very interesting that you are instead calling Proto-Germanic to be Northwest Germanic with the East as an anomoly, since that IS a useful designation... that is very unique, I think, and does show some keen understanding of the development of Germanic language, because as soon as Germanic Word Stress Change begins in the East Germanic dialects, so does Proto-Germanic then become less and less the small time-frame identity it once had, which really points to Proto-Germanic not really being worth identifying as a 'language.' FTY, for those who don't know: the Germanic Word Stress Change (versus the previous Indo-European word stress system) is so important because it causes so many different changes between Northwest and East Germanic in conjunction with Verner's Law, First Umlaut, and Loss of a Mora in Unstressed Word-Final Syllables.

that is actually why I don't use the term Proto-Germanic... Pre-Germanic Indo-European, because Lithuanian and others come from the same IE source which is also why I use IE combined with earliest evidence of Germanic...

but your other statement is a little boggling:

most of the names that figure in E.B are actually of Old frisian origin

the language of EB's Swēbōzez, naming and terminology, ect. and thus my reconstructions (you understand that I am the author of all the most recent Germanic naming except the map?) use a lot of Gothic too, so I don't know why you think it's exclusively based in Northwest Germanic, other than recognizing stuff you've worked with? Nonetheless, your attitude of educating me in said concepts, which I've obviously mastered to the degree that I have, is a little amusing. I certainly don't mind talking about it, it is very interesting and enjoyable to discuss language, especially for me Germanic and Indo-European, but you're not talking to a 'fan' if you didn't know.

Your arguments for Anglo-Frisian are actually the very argument I would have with any German nationalist who claims that an English-speaking American could never know about Germanic language I would actually argue that Anglo-Frisian and the Low Germans who stayed near their homeland are more Germanic than migrant mountainmen (oops, I didn't say that). all Germanic speakers are the same, as in awesome, and interesting

thanks for the link to the fonts, i have a good one Yggdrasil, but i can always use more like that BTW, i have tatoos of runes even, hehe, mainland German style (stylistically preferred at the time). I am quite proud of that rather than Celtic tribal, random Asian characters or barcode-like tatoos off the wall or book that makes me just slightly different than everybody else's carbon copy. one says 'Leben ist Lieben' (a philosophy of duality and seeing the light within darkness) and one has my initials.

is your project going to be published or filmed, or is it mostly hobby? or other?

[Cartaphilus]

Gothic(wich is a dead language) had a lot of remnants of Biblic hebrew(wich can be explained by the Goths having converted to Arianism)!

And because the gothic is mainly known through "The Bible of Ulfilas".

[Viking_Wårlord]

we appreciate the comment. of course there are so many gifted members in non-Germanic specialties that I am likewise amazed all the time
__________________

Viking_Warlord, care to offer any evidence other than the fantastic claims made just now with no reference, which isn't even listed anywhere in the field of study, nonetheless on the unsolicited OT links you posted from Wikipedia? you still haven't supplied a single scrap of evidence of what you're talking about other than some speculation on Dutch having retention of ancient Germanic elements... which end up being IE elements... I agree that Dutch is a very interesting language and so are its parent familial dialects, for the same reasons.

Just to be clear, you're suggesting 'Frisian' existed as the master-language of Lowland Germany / Netherlands (neglecting the standardized designation of 'West Germanic') but even so, earlier than Late Antiquity and during Classical times?

Are you referring to 'Old Franconian' or postulated term 'Ingaevonic' aka Anglo-Frisian? Again, what is your point and what is your evidence?


what do you mean by 'false once more' - care to explain this? you imply an occasion beyond the recent post.

FYI - I am hardly 'false' when I know where I got my material. do you honestly think you know what sources I used better than I? If you want to prove this wrong, give us some literary evidence that I unknowingly used information from an Old Franconian or Old Frisian manuscript... that would be helpful in making such a point.

We both know that Frankish and angl-frisian are west Germanic right?
Now,of all the languages that descend from the western Germanic dialects,Frisian is the one that has the less evolved(older than Icelandic) hence you could speak Old english to a Frisian and he would understand(it has been prooven by 'Mongrel Nation' a BBC T.V program).
Hence we concluded that this is the most reliable of all languages to study proto-Germanic,most of the names that figure in E.B are actually of Old frisian origin(wich is barely the same)....
Geddit?
By the way,I like arguing with you and as I see you're interested in my work(ironic) here's a few fonts you could use...
http://www.rune-fonts.co.uk/fontlist.php

I hope you'll make good use of them?
And if you don't know how to install them...Just ask me!

[Elmetiacos]

Elmetiacos, you also do not know what you're talking about. My reconstructions are in no way 'easy' or based on derivations alone or artificial constructions as implied, as a IE translation of a fable would be, but are in-fact based on true terminology in most all instances, with actual usage historically and contextually consistent across all major dialects of Germanic and cross-IE cognates.

Huh? What? I never said it was easy, so lose the quotation marks - all I said was that reconstruction of a Germanic language for the Suebi is easier than one for the Lusitani or for Daco-Thracian, because those are languages with no living descendants!