Am I the only one who said "yes definitely"? Wow
Well you are the only one who voted Yes definetly though another poster did say yes. So it's 19 to 1 right now against it.

For me it's not just the whole tech thing, or graphics.

It has to do with it being over done. Do you know how many ww2 strategy games there are? Guess, double that, your close.

For me it no longer has even the faintest shred of interest. FPS's and strategy games have been done, redone, and overdone about ww2 so much that I see no physical means, even if they developed a moon engine, of making it interesting.

WW 2 maybe the largest war..depending on how you factor it.

My bigger question would be is this TW 1900-1950 or TW WW2. The idea being TW 1900-1950 you could form your own alliances, disasters and enemies and you would decide how the eventual allies v axis teams break out. WW2 TW would be the same old Americans/British/French/Russians v Germans/Japs/Italians.

Company of heroes is real time. I don't think the time frame translates that well to turn base.

That said, I'd assume if they did aircombat they would do it similiar to naval. IE you'd zoom into a sky scene and control individual planes that battle. Like ships pretty much.


I just think the period is massively overdone in every other form of media out there, including games. I have no interest in seeing it in TW