I'm not fishing for anything.

The point of this game is to settle the "Which army was better, Rome or Greece?" question. In history, we already know which one was better. In the game, it cannot be tested properly, because people will not use historical armies. The army posted a while ago with nothing but elites in it is simply not historical for the time this game is set in. A mix of any of those troops with a lot of levies is, but not a 100% elite army that never existed in this time frame.

Instead people should be picking individual battles between Rome and Greece/Macedonia/Seleukia and recreating those. That would be a much easier thing to test with the game.
Hellenic warfare would beat Roman warfare any day frankly. As it did.

Of course Rome won in the end due to sheer overwhelming numbers. How many times did Rome get their armies totaly destroyed, and still managed to raise new ones?

You can easily confirm what i am saying just by seeing what hapened to Pyrrhus and to Carthage. And you can of course say that Rome could beat Macedonia any day as it did, but, by the time they actually beated Macedonia, Greek warfare had returned to the stone age, for it was mostly only a clash of phalanx.