The RAF not ultra violent? Old RAF-members are now in the antifa. They recruit for the FARC, FARC not violent? There was also an attempted murder on Janmaat (not that he wasn't a creep), and why do you think Wilders needs protection. Why do you think bankiers need protection. Because of ultra-violent extreme leftist scum, that's why.
why not google leftist terrorism.
Last edited by Fragony; 06-10-2009 at 11:13.
"The European extreme left in its original strength and influence is now history. The activities of its successors are less violent overall. Unlike the brutal operations of Islamist terrorism which targets masses of civilians, the main tactic of extreme left terrorism is that of damaging property, with only isolated selective attacks on individuals. Weapons with greater damaging effects are very rarely used (as in Greece by the Revolutionary Struggle group)."
- Your article
Last edited by CountArach; 06-10-2009 at 11:40.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Less violent doesn't mean not violent. And let's not even start about mental terror, it must be quite harrowing to have pictures of your children mailed at you with a little note that they know which school they are going. Very harrowing if your car explodes, very harrowing if your house is set on fire in the middle of the night.
Yes, because I'm sure social conservatives have never blown things up.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Bookmarks