So, why is Sigurd being lynched?
If I understand it well:
a) he was investigated N1 and result was that he was doing protection
b) he was investigated again N2 and there was nothing about protection;
GH explained that second investigation reveals susceptibility (sp?), so it's normal that it doesn't say something about the night action
Sig was performing;
c)
CR says:
Sigurd probably knew that and used the opportunity to kill on N2, because he's a good player;
d)
Sigurd is afk because of RL and can't tell us about his night actions.
Is thát the case which warrants a bandwagon on
Sigurd?
Really?
Big FoS
Crazed Rabbit.
If you're oh so certain about
Sigurd, dear
Crazed Rabbit then this is the deal: if
Sigurd's autopsy reveals him to be innocent, it's mutiny and you'll walk the plank. I hope you like sharks.
Vote : Louis VI the Fat
Gut feeling, can't really explain.
Bookmarks