What have you been up to then? Been protecting people?
Also - I am slowly begining to think that some players are required by role to be anti-officer. I can understand analysis. Or gut feeling. But the persistence of Andres against me, and of Tincow against Pizza I just don't understand.
Why the outspoken, absolute conviction, repeated over and over again, that the First Mate (Andres), or QM (Tincow) will mean the utter ruin of the town? There does seem to be an ulterior motive at work.
It would explain the foreshadowing by the Host in the beginning of the game:Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
That's nice storytelling, but it seems to me this game was designed with the idea of townie-on-townie violence purposefully in mind, to cause disunity and chaos... enough such that the mafia should have a decent chance of winning. In particular, anti-officer sentiment. That would explain the utterly ridiculous and baseless calls for a mutiny so early on in the game. Mafia would probably not be crazy enough to immediately challenge the establishment, who have investigative, blocking, and killing powers. Shows up on the radar too soon. So... why would townies wish put someone into office and then oppose them immediately? That would seem contrary to a standard townie strategy.Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
You might be onto something there, Louis. Very creative game set-up, if this is how it was designed. I couldn't imagine a Pirate Ship mafia without mutinous players. Given the amount of pro-town roles we were given, and basic townies, compared to how few mafia there were to start with, it seems to me the game would be terribly unbalanced, and not characteristic of the spirit of piracy, if town were so united and powerful. The balancing element, it seems, is disunity.
Ergo, seamen who must work to depose the officers.
Crazed Rabbit, what have you gotten me into?![]()
Last edited by Askthepizzaguy; 10-12-2009 at 20:58.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
You guys are seriously underestimating the FUN factor that a mutiny would bring.
I'm sure GH has a hilarious write-up ready about the funniest mutiny ever, but you guys are just refusing to cooperate.
Last edited by Andres; 10-12-2009 at 20:56.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
unvote:avsm, vote:shlin
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 10-12-2009 at 21:10.
Shlin28 isn't the Mafia.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Mutiny is anti-captain. I think there are anti-FM and anti-QM roles too.
Face it, you and Tincow love your fun. BUT...you are not calling for mutiny. Andres has, since the very beginning of the game been specifically anti-First Mate. Tincow is not after mutiny either. He is specifically anti-Quartermaster.
And the two of you are too good of a player, to reasonable, to behave the way you two do in this game.
Strange how you were suicidal and argued for your own lynch before you got in office, yet now you think your death would be pointless. There's another option, you know... abandon ship. If you're so selfless and pro-town, you can remove yourself from the game without causing any problems. But you won't do that, will you? You didn't do it before when your very existence was a threat to us all. Instead, you made grandiose threats about how much a disaster it would be if you still lived and *poof* you were an officer.
So, tell me... when this whole thing started, why didn't you just abandon ship, Mr. Self-less Pro-town Pirate?
Of course it's deliberate... I didn't think I could make my intentions any more clear. I've been trying to get you out of office for a long time now. I pursued it mainly via private channels in an attempt to keep the issue from derailing the discussion, but those efforts have obviously failed. So, I'm now doing it publicly.Again, this is too sloppy for you. It's deliberate. You simply want me, specifically, removed and dead. Even though several people vouched for my innocence. It's pretty transparent. There's no other reasonable explanation. And you're a reasonable guy.
I am no such thing. I never had a beef with Sigurd before he was lynched, nor will I complain about anyone who is put into the position after ATPG. I am anti-ATPG, not anti-QM.
Bookmarks