Netherworld II [Concluded]

**ULC** · 01-01-2010, 23:19

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Who are you even talking to? This makes no sense.

I honestly do not understand why you posted this from another thread in here.

**Diamondeye** · 01-01-2010, 23:21

Okay, unvote:YLC. I'm giving you the benefit of doubt. vote:GH

**GeneralHankerchief** · 01-01-2010, 23:22

Originally Posted by YLC

I honestly do not understand why you posted this from another thread in here.

You respond to Sasaki's post, which came chronologically after mine, before you come to my post, which was addressed directly at you.

You[']r[e] trying to avoid me, Mr.[YLC], and my reasoning - why?

**ULC** · 01-02-2010, 00:53

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

You respond to Sasaki's post, which came chronologically after mine, before you come to my post, which was addressed directly at you.

You[']r[e] trying to avoid me, Mr.[YLC], and my reasoning - why?

I was more shocked by Sasaki's post and wanted to follow up immediately on it - also, I was busy at the moment and couldn't properly respond to you.

To answer why and how you've been petty - maybe I am confusing you with TC, not sure - your responses just sound so alike. I mean, you literally copied each others posts at one point only changing perspective so they made sense. Your going at me as if, both of you, that I am some how a pest, and using tactics like trying to defame me instead of arguing the point.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 01-02-2010, 01:16

Originally Posted by YLC

To answer why and how you've been petty - maybe I am confusing you with TC, not sure - your responses just sound so alike. I mean, you literally copied each others posts at one point only changing perspective so they made sense. Your going at me as if, both of you, that I am some how a pest, and using tactics like trying to defame me instead of arguing the point.

Referring to the "I copied his post" point, I was already playfully poking fun of that exact point you were making at that time. Try digging closer to the source.

Also, Winston, you're using a WIFOM defense. Anybody could say they'd do X in a certain position while in reality doing Y to deliberately confuse someone. WIFOM defenses generally hold little water around here, so try again.

**Winston Hughes** · 01-02-2010, 01:30

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

so try again.

Why bother? Anything I say could be lies. The question is not whether it's possible I'm trying to mislead you, but whether I sound like I'm trying to mislead you. Do I?

In any case, since I think my reasoning is sound on the first point, I wonder if I haven't touched a nerve here. vote: GeneralHankerchief

**Beefy187** · 01-02-2010, 01:34

Unvote, Vote: Winston Hughs

The last few post of yours are extremely scummy to the point of me wanting to unvote and vote for you... ON ROUND 1.

**Winston Hughes** · 01-02-2010, 01:36

Originally Posted by Beefy187

The last few post of yours are extremely scummy to the point of me wanting to unvote and vote for you... ON ROUND 1.

If I sound this guilty when I'm innocent, imagine how easy it's going to be to catch me when I'm actually guilty.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 01-02-2010, 01:41

Originally Posted by Winston Hughes

Why bother? Anything I say could be lies. The question is not whether it's possible I'm trying to mislead you, but whether I sound like I'm trying to mislead you. Do I?

In any case, since I think my reasoning is sound on the first point, I wonder if I haven't touched a nerve here. vote: GeneralHankerchief

Hey, I was just trying to help a newbie out with a friendly bit of advice. I don't think you're guilty, just using a bad defense.