wuta claim that does not come out particularly well from historical scrutiny
wuta claim that does not come out particularly well from historical scrutiny
Well Britain simply showed up one day and proclaimed the Falklands theirs. That much is true.
Such is imperialism.
In this the Argentinians are right. I still remember dear old Soulforged (hope he is well), our Buenos Aires law student, arguing at great length the legal history of the Falklands. The poor guy was right too.
It's just that more overriding sentiments for me are the sheer passage of time and the nature of colonial landgrabbing, most of which can scarcely be undone anymore. And for most Britons, self-determination.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
I sir demand you return your norwegian territory in Antartica.Let 'em have it, I say.
Why the brits feel they can own a piece of land on the other side of the globe is beyond me, really. It's closest to Argentina, and as such it's appropriate for the islands to belong to Argentina.
But I guess the Brits need something to remind themselves of a time when other nations actually cared about them....
such a ridiculous statement.
If the Falkies vote in a referendum for independence they are welcome to it. If not tough luck Argies.
Stupid argument anyway as the Brits would militarily kick the Argies into next week. The Brits are at the moment technologically superior and battle hardened from Afghanistan (which matters more you could ever imagine).
By the By i do enjoy the Brits clinging to some of the last vestiges of British Empire. not that i argue im a big fan.
So, I guess we all agree, that the chances of POTUS Obama trying to revive some version of the Monroe Doctrine... are less than nil?
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
Every area of land has been claimed and re-claimed over the years. Try to sort out what bits of Europe belong to who, for example. Proximity has no bearing on the matter - especially as it's a few hundred miles off the coast.
Land is invariably taken by force and kept by force. In the old days to prove the point, the persons who were on the land were slaughtered to ensure no resurgence, or at the least "relocated" elsewhere.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Surely if we wish to return the island to it's original inhabitants, we should kick out the British and establish a Penguin's Republic of the Falklands?
Sorry I'm late to the thread, been busy passing AIB the last few days :)
Just got a few points to make in no particular order:
1) Argentina has similar military capabilities to the ones it had almost 30 years ago and, if anything, they have actually got worse.
2) The Royal Navy has been training for just this situation for almost 30 years. They are now far better equipped to neutralise any and all threats the Argentians can muster (look up Sea Dart, Seawolf, Goalkeeper and Phalanx if you want to know why). The only area we are worse off now than in 1982 is naval fighter cover since Mr Brown et al decided to retire Sea Harrier and not bother replacing it to save money, however we have 4 brand-spanking new Eurofighters sitting in hardened shelters on the Falklands instead which, conveniently, brings me on to...
3) We are actually prepared to repel an invasion now. There are constantly 1000 or so military personnel ready to defend the islands. The Argentinians either need to come by air, in which case the Eurofighters and Rapier AA defences will rip them to shreds, or they need to come by sea, in which case an SSN or two will decimate their fleet.
Basically, an Argentinian invasion is just a complete non-starter! Now we know there is oil (likely 60 billion barrels or so), there is no chance we'll give it up without a fight and, due to the reasons above, it is a fight we'll win every time, not to mention the Islanders clear preference for British rule.
What makes it worse for the Argentinians is that they gave 50% of their share of that oil away in protest in 2007... talk about stupid moves to do.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
wait the british got rid of the sea harrier and decided not to replace it so you have no naval fighters. im sorry thats just stupid then you should just get rid of your carriers.
Pft.
You'll notice the Britons here bite their tongue over my provocations.
That is because they don't have a Navy deserving of that name anymore and will be dependent on Paris' mighty fleet for maintaining their Empire. I will have my fun for my tax money. In fact, it is the best €8500000000000000 I've ever spend. Washington is not going to help them. It didn't last time, nor will it want to upset Latin America this time - what with the Latino vote etc.
Britain will come running to us. So looking forward to their grovelling. From behind my large mahogany desk, I shall threat the Briton with due reservedness and natural aloofness. I'll wear my dark suit I imported from Milan, its tone reflects well in my eyes, gives them a natural authority.
*dreams*
Louis, I think that silence is really just pity. I know. I get that all the time.![]()
This space intentionally left blank
Which would be that the USA would do nothing and the UK would be well within its right to slap Argentina should it invade. Monroe doctrine specifically limits its scope to asserting the right of (former) colonial territories to independence and the US' god given right to remove any such independence in whatever America; it does not include the right of former colonies to do a land grab with USA support.
Last edited by Tellos Athenaios; 02-24-2010 at 23:11.
- Tellos Athenaios
CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread
“ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.
![]()
![]()
"Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?"
-Abraham Lincoln
Four stage strategy from Yes, Minister:
Stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
Stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.
No, Fleet Air Arm got an upgrade:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Force_Harrier
The F2 was ancient anyway, about 3 generations behind the GR9.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
Do you even know what the Norwegian land in Antarcita consists of?
It's a research facility. Norwegian scientists want to do research on ice and stuff like that, so we've built a few shacks down there for them. Whether the land legally belongs to the Norwegian state or not is so irrelevant it's getting ridiculous.
Anyway..... No matter how you look at it, the Falklanders are immigrants. British nationalists usually tell immigrants to "go back where they came from".... Or is that only the case with brown immigrants?
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
I think there being much more discreet this time, I could see a possible war if Argentina are ready to do so. There reasoning is awful though, clearly just want the islands for themselves. I think an attempt at diplomacy could be useful this time instead of just going in all guns blazing.
The only way this will truly be resolved is if England conquers over Argentina, or just gives Argentina the islands, both seem unlikely, lol.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
If Argentina decides to start another Falklands war, I think perhaps after the UK gets done spanking the Argentines, the Brits should annex Terra Del Fuego just to piss them off a little more.
Just to point out UK will never invade Argentina over the Falklands again mainly cos Brazil the new regional power in South America would not be best pleased that either side started throwing stones at each other.
This type of political posturing is likely to increase now that Britain is seen as fading in a military sense. Argentina is not able to press it further but having a powerful Brazil next door allows them to shout behind them so to speak at the other party.
The UK is likely to find it will have to engage in diplomacy in a very serious manner in this region sooner or later there is a possibility of being pushed aside by Brazil. This outcome is not something I believe Brazil crave's although Argentina would be over the moon it is possible it could happen if the UK ignore the situation.
They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.
Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Look it up HoreTore, 25% of the population are pre-colonial.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.
Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy
That would only be a problem with Spain, and Portugal if Brazil throws a hissy fit. Besides, we would certainly have the support of France, and if we dangled a promise of greater integration, then you could probably get everyone else on board.
Would it be sensible to dangle greater integration with the EU over the Falklands?
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
There was no human habitation of the Falklands prior to European settlement. 70% of the native-born population is of British descent. These are the legendary 'kelpers'. The other 30% percent are nearly all recent immigrants from Britain, and then a very small percent of the population is people from other countries.
Bookmarks