Mafia IX: Triumph of the Mafia [Concluded]

[Subotan]

Other than the Ibn saving vote (which had no logical reasoning behind it)

His vote for me to annoy you is fairly symbolic too, he votes for me over you because he knows I already have votes and could be killed fairly easily, whereas Sasaki has no votes, if Subotan is mafia he hardly wants to drag end game out with random votes does he?

Also him agreeing with relying on voting data suggests hes trying his hardest to vote away from a mafia like pattern, which makes sense all in all.
:

I voted for Sigurd as I still though that he was suspicious from the previous round. The fact that I saved Ibn As well as Sasaki I might add is due to unlucky timing more than anything else.

So I'm guilty because I bandwagon And because I don't bandwagon?
I voted for you because I think you have been more consistently suspicious and therefore more likely to be scum than either Psycho or woad. Simples.

And if you had actually read what I'd said, you would find that I was in fact arguing for the complete opposite, that voting analysis cannot be relied upon in a game where there are no reveals. Come to think of it, in addition to trying to frame me like that, you were actually the one who brought up the analysis in the first place! How can you claim that my support of voting analysis (which is wrong) is scummy when you are the original analyser!?

[Kagemusha]

In matter of fact i think Subotan is making a case here. Also the killing Method of mafia seems awfully consistent and systematical. There isnt anything irregular about it. People die the second it comes propable that they are innocent. Me thinks that the random Org has finally hit Sasaki. Unvote and vote: Sasaki Kojiro.

[Thermal]

I voted for Sigurd as I still though that he was suspicious from the previous round. The fact that I saved Ibn As well as Sasaki I might add is due to unlucky timing more than anything else.

So I'm guilty because I bandwagon And because I don't bandwagon?
I voted for you because I think you have been more consistently suspicious and therefore more likely to be scum than either Psycho or woad. Simples.

And if you had actually read what I'd said, you would find that I was in fact arguing for the complete opposite, that voting analysis cannot be relied upon in a game where there are no reveals. Come to think of it, in addition to trying to frame me like that, you were actually the one who brought up the analysis in the first place! How can you claim that my support of voting analysis (which is wrong) is scummy when you are the original analyser!?

Your vote for sigurd was backed up with inky pinky ponky, and your vote for me backed up with 'to get at sasaki' its amazing how your reasoning for votes change when you want them to.

It could be unlucky timing, then again, it could not...

I never said you were guilty for not bandwagonning/bandwagonning, I get the same questions hurled at me from yaseikhaan. But your analysis to no analysis is suspicious, if you really do find me so suspicious you would have put a reason like you did last round, instead you vote with no almost no logical explanation and wonder why it gets pointed out.

Notice that the two you mention have half or less posts than me, you see my posts more often so I bound to say something a tad surprising or scummy here and there, those that only say select words have less to worry about in that regard.

Sorry for not reading the whole 1000+ post thread If you were arguing against it then why do you say that ATPG is entirely right and voting data is so useful? All your doing here is contradicting yourself, unless of course that quote is forged, it was posted by Sasaki, so I go from what I see. It's not framing, its reading your posts (which you point out I haven't done enough of ) the amount of time your spending on this game is surprising for some townie, will plausably excuses like typing on the iphone to hopefully conceal any potential questioning of your posts. I'm not questioning that your on an Iphone, but it still gives you something to blame, ATPG's point of this game meaning a lot to you ties in with that too.

If I did bring up the relying on voting pattern first (I can't remember if I did) then its because at the time it seemed like a good idea, still kind of does, I pointed it out as a case against you specifically because your votes seem erratic and low key. Talking about the voting pattern being a good idea is no crime, its whether your own voting pattern resembles a criminal offense or not.



I'll probably find lots of loopholes in that but still

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Subo, the whole point is that you have lots of energy (iphone or no) to spend defending yourself and talking at length about what makes a good vote. But your actual votes are totally vacuous, leaving nothing that can be argued with because you are "just joking around". That's very out of sync with your strategy/gameplay analysis posts which only appear when you are accused.

[naut]

Subo, the whole point is that you have lots of energy (iphone or no) to spend defending yourself and talking at length about what makes a good vote. But your actual votes are totally vacuous

Boom. We have today's candidate.

Vote: Subotan