A New Low

**Don Corleone** · 08-08-2005, 18:17

Wow. I am amazed nobody has posted this story yet. For those of you who think I am over the top in my criticism of the New York Times, take a look at this...

If you can't get dirt on the nominee, go for his toddler children...

The New York Times, despite it's claims to the contrary, is seeking to peek inside the sealed adoption records of Justice Roberts' 5 year old daughter & 4 year old son. Talk about 'stop at nothing'. How do these people live with themselves? They're going to tar & feather a 4 year old boy, just to play a partisan game, against a guy, who by all accounts is fairly moderate in his views and even did pro-bono work to help a homosexual lobbying group in a civil rights case.

Man, the Left knows no decency...

**scooter_the_shooter** · 08-08-2005, 18:43

I have seen that before it. It isn't just ny times there was one far left organization trying to claim the 4 year old was gay.

**Byzantine Prince** · 08-08-2005, 18:49

Lol, they made fun of the little on Jon Stewart as well. That was hillarious, he was like dancing all over the place, with new hip hop beats an style that I had never seen!

Er... what are you talking about the Left? Why is it that a few leftwinger's views are so determining of the entire ideology?

Sure we bash Bush and his cronies, but that's because they actually have power!

**scooter_the_shooter** · 08-08-2005, 18:56

Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince

Lol, they made fun of the little on Jon Stewart as well. That was hillarious, he was like dancing all over the place, with new hip hop beats an style that I had never seen!

Er... what are you talking about the Left? Why is it that a few leftwinger's views are so determining of the entire ideology?

Sure we bash Bush and his cronies, but that's because they actually have power!

byz dont wine about bush.

He is not your president
And america showed they wanted him there in 04

**Samurai Waki** · 08-08-2005, 19:00

About half of America did anyway.

**Don Corleone** · 08-08-2005, 18:58

I cannot speak for the Canadian Leftist movement, but the New York Times is the rallying point for the American Left. It's not even considered Far-Left, and most of the Leftists I know in day-to-day life try very hard to keep a straight face while they claim it's unbiased and objective. They usually don't succeed, but it is mainstream media for the Left, and gives you a good idea where the minds and hearts of the Democratic leadership is.

**Don Corleone** · 08-08-2005, 19:03

Originally Posted by ceasar010

I have seen that before it. It isn't just ny times there was one far left organization trying to claim the 4 year old was gay.

That was from a chatboard on MoveOn.org

**Redleg** · 08-08-2005, 19:06

Originally Posted by Don Corleone

That was from a chatboard on MoveOn.org

And that it would show up in a chatboard at that site does not suprise me at all. Hateful idealogs are what primarily post at moveon.org.

**Steppe Merc** · 08-08-2005, 19:12

Times? I prefer the Star Ledger... but because it has comics.

**Don Corleone** · 08-08-2005, 19:15

Sorry, it was the Daily Kos, not Moveon.Org. Hard to tell the venom slingers apart these days. Here's the whole quote, from the Wall Street Journal editorial page...

Originally Posted by David Tarranto, WSJ Editorial Page

A poster on the Daily Kos, a site as influential on the left as it is deranged, wrote (ellipsis in original):

Originally Posted by The whackjobs on the Daily KOS

When Roberts thanked his family, he mentioned his son, Jack . . . Roberts' wife's face fell. It was like a poker tell. I think we should research Jack.

Another poster wrote that Roberts's son "is probably gay," explaining that "extreme conservatives seem to have a lot of homosexual children." Jack Roberts is 4 years old.

If the New York Times is getting it's marching orders from the Daily KOS, which as this story indicates it is, they are in a world of hurt. Jason Blair will come to signify a highpoint in their journalistic prestige, not a low.

**Crazed Rabbit** · 08-08-2005, 19:27

The abortion right's nuts are terrified because they just realized that, unlike laws made by the legislatures, what the SCOTUS grants, they can just as easily take away. Those arrogant pricks want the SCOTUS to do their bidding and not have to deal with such outdated ideas as democracy and legislatures.

And, boy oh boy, are these lefties scum. They don't even have the facade of caring about the good of the country. They just want to hamper Bush any way they can.

Crazed Rabbit

**Steppe Merc** · 08-08-2005, 19:33

The good of the country? Since when has any politician gave a damn about that?

**Crazed Rabbit** · 08-08-2005, 19:43

I'm not even talking about just politicians; but about 'journalists' at the NYT, and people at this KOS site.

Occasionally, a politician will put their country ahead of them. But it is rather rare.

Crazed Rabbit