Thoughts & Commentary on the Obama Administration

[a completely inoffensive name]

More interesting polling...

I didn't know interesting was a synonym for biased.

[Megas Methuselah]

lol

[Crazed Rabbit]

I didn't know interesting was a synonym for biased.

So CNN/Opinion Research Corporation surveys are biased? What makes you say that? Or is any poll that's favorable to Bush and/or unfavorable to Obama biased?

euro euro euro. say wat?

Ah, so you're saying it sucks to be you. I won't disagree.

Anyway, the whole blatant lying from Obama about 'foreign money' funding the Chamber of Commerce's political ads is really disgusting. Maybe a new low for the past few political cycles for someone so high up?

I'll let Reason TV take it away:


CR

[Lemur]

Maybe a new low for the past few political cycles for someone so high up?

Maybe, but I don't think anyone will top the deliberate manipulation of the timing of terror alerts for sheer crassness and cynicism. Claiming the furners are paying for political ads is one thing; invoking fear of death and Ay-rabs is another.

Not that one makes the other okay; I'll leave the tu quoque arguments to the true believers.

[Louis VI the Fat]

Megs got owned onwed onewd !1!

[PanzerJaeger]

I didn't know interesting was a synonym for biased.

How so?

[Strike For The South]

So you're telling me politicos lie and demonize there oposition to keep and consolidate power?

DO THE PEOPLE KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING

[drone]

Even though Ken Cuccinelli is a self-serving, ambitious little weasel, the man does know his way around a courtroom. He has successfully challenged Obamacare's mandatory health care purchase provision in Virginia's US District Court, setting up a future fight in the Supreme Court.

RICHMOND - A federal judge in Virginia ruled Monday that a key provision of the nation's sweeping health-care overhaul is unconstitutional, the most significant legal setback so far for President Obama's signature domestic initiative.

U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson found that Congress could not order individuals to buy health insurance.

In a 42-page opinion, Hudson said the provision of the law that requires most individuals to get insurance or pay a fine by 2014 is an unprecedented expansion of federal power that cannot be supported by Congress's power to regulate interstate trade.

"Neither the Supreme Court nor any federal circuit court of appeals has extended Commerce Clause powers to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market," he wrote. "In doing so, enactment of the [individual mandate] exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article I [of the Constitution.]

Judges decision here.

[PanzerJaeger]

Obamacare hits a new low in support, according to an obviously biased ABC poll.

[PanzerJaeger]

It has been a bad week for the president, to say the least. You know things are going South when liberals in 2011 start sounding like conservatives in 2008.

A second possibility is that he is simply not up to the task by virtue of his lack of experience and a character defect that might not have been so debilitating at some other time in history. Those of us who were bewitched by his eloquence on the campaign trail chose to ignore some disquieting aspects of his biography: that he had accomplished very little before he ran for president, having never run a business or a state; that he had a singularly unremarkable career as a law professor, publishing nothing in 12 years at the University of Chicago other than an autobiography; and that, before joining the United States Senate, he had voted "present" (instead of "yea" or "nay") 130 times, sometimes dodging difficult issues.

A somewhat less charitable explanation is that we are a nation that is being held hostage not just by an extremist Republican Party but also by a president who either does not know what he believes or is willing to take whatever position he thinks will lead to his re-election. Perhaps those of us who were so enthralled with the magnificent story he told in “Dreams From My Father” appended a chapter at the end that wasn’t there — the chapter in which he resolves his identity and comes to know who he is and what he believes in.

[Lemur]

That Westin editorial stirred things up quite a bit. My brother, for example, is a straight-up liberal Democrat, and he's been moping around about President 44 lately, which I think is terribly short-sighted. I kinda like Fareed Zakaria's response:

Maybe Obama understands that with a budget deficit of 10% of GDP, the second highest in the industrialized world, and a debt that will rise to almost 100% of GDP in a few years, we cannot cavalierly spend another few trillion dollars hoping that will jump-start the economy. Perhaps he believes that while banks need better regulations, America also needs a vibrant banking system, and that in a globalized economy, constraining American banks will only ensure that the world’s largest global financial institutions will be British, German, Swiss and Chinese. He might understand that Larry Summers and Tim Geithner are smart people who, in long careers in public service, got some things wrong but also got many things right. Perhaps he understands that getting entitlement costs under control is in fact a crucial part of stabilizing our fiscal situation, and that you do need both tax increases and spending cuts—cuts that are smaller than they appear because they all start with the 2010 budget, which was boosted by the stimulus. Is all this dangerous weakness, incoherence and appeasement, or is it common sense?

[Xiahou]

I think my head might have exploded. Obama said something that I completely agree with....

That begins with winding down the companies known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. For too long, these companies were allowed to make big profits buying mortgages, knowing that if their bets went bad, taxpayers would be left holding the bag. It was “heads we win, tails you lose.” And it was wrong.

The good news is that there’s a bipartisan group of Senators working to end Fannie and Freddie as we know them. I support these kinds of efforts, and today I want to lay out four core principles for what I believe this reform should look like.

First, private capital should take a bigger role in the mortgage market. I know that must sound confusing to the folks who call me a raging socialist every day. But just like the health care law that set clear rules for insurance companies to protect consumers and make it more affordable for millions to buy coverage on the private market, I believe that while our housing system must have a limited government role, private lending should be the backbone of the housing market, including community-based lenders who view their borrowers not as a number, but as a neighbor.

Second, no more leaving taxpayers on the hook for irresponsibility or bad decisions. We encourage the pursuit of profit – but the era of expecting a bailout after your pursuit of profit puts the whole country at risk is over.

Sure, it'll probably have caveats or other conditions that will ruin it for me.... but I'll just enjoy the moment.