Wat era is the best for playin multi?

[Vexilles]

I personally like the high era best i find it is the most balanced era, in early the byzantium's army's really seem to dominate and in late i think the cannons are far far to accurate, and they reload way way way to fast, i remember reading that during the middle ages cannons could only be fired a few times a day because it took so long to reload. As for the viking era i just dont like how small the selection of units is.

I still play all eras but i like high an early best with late not to bad but i rarely play viking.

So wat do u all think? http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/smokin.gif

[Red Yak]

I seem to mainly go for High. Probably because I think Early or Late? Hmmm, can't decide. Lets go with the one inbetween. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif
Though admittedly I don't choose Early much as there isn't as much troop variety.

I don't pick Vikings as I have yet to play a Viking Campaign. But also put off by the lack of variety as well.

[Magic Window]

It also depends on the amount of Florins you have to spend in-game. Playing a low florin match in Late can leave you with a distinct lack of troops and valour. When it comes to higher expense, it usually doesn't matter because you can fill out a whole army.

[Nowake]

Late. That is what is called a clash http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[Brutal DLX]

Any era. For variety's sake and it's the players you play with or against that create the joy/challenge, not the era.

[Simovek]

I like to play Viking era, sadly just about no one else does. I like the fact that it has a smaller troop selection. With MTW there is way to many units for me to choose from. VI just reminds me more of STW which I like very much.