Printable View
I was wondering about the animation for the Syracusan hoplites. It says in the description that they used their longer spears in an underhand fashion which I would see as similar to the Roman spear auxilia in vanilla Rome. Am I understanding the description wrong, engine limitations, or was there a less obvious reason for the overhand spear animation?
It may be that the plan changed while the unit was begin fixed. Or it could be that the unit shares a model with a Carthaginian unit that uses the overhand animation and therefore would also have to use that animation.
They modelshare with the Liby-Phoenicians IIRC.
Ahh, ok thanks for the help guys.
To be honest, the Syracusan Hoplites will not be appearing in EB2 they way they did in EB1 - assuming they will be in the game at all.
Never noticed the problem with their animation - Most likely because I rarely ever field or encounter them at all.
I hope that you fix all the hoplites so they act like hoplites instead of backpedalling legionaires that take forever to kill.Quote:
Originally Posted by abou
Why would Syrakousai Hoplitai not appear in EBII? That's sad to hear; I love the unit. :sad:Quote:
Originally Posted by abou
same. I love classical hoplites in general, they look so cool formed up in my gigantic armies of thousands of them. :smash: love em
The unit was originally conceived by a member of the team who is no longer active. He's a very respected former member so at the time we took his word for it, but we haven't been able to verify much in the way of evidence for the unit as conceived and he did not provide any at the time. As far as we can tell, there isn't any overt difference from the way the hoplites of Syracuse fought compared to, say, the hoplites of Athens.
And that is why historians always have to provide evidence for the stuff they do...
It is a pity though. I hope the Syracusan hoplites' beautiful models (particularly the shields) will be reused in some way for some other hoplite type in EB II.
I gues we can conclude from that that Syracuse wont be a faction? :shame: Really looks that way when we see alot of EB members saying they wont stay the same or wont be there at all which wouldn't be said if it would be a confirmed faction for you guys. :skull:Quote:
Originally Posted by abou
Don't know how your getting that idea, they're talking about a specific unit which seems to have some issues with its sources not a whole faction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx300
That said I have never believed Syrakousai would be a faction so I wouldn't be too bothered if it was absent.
Syracuse faction - Syracusian Hoplites.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbin
See my point? :inquisitive:
watQuote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx300
There could be a Syrakousai faction that uses the same Hoplites as of the koinon hellenon.
Would be weird to have a rebel people with more unique units then a new faction right? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucefalo
I do but i don't think you see mine, no Syracusian hoplites doesnt mean no Syracuse it just means that particular unit might not be in (due to the problems with the sources for it).Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx300
so the skin would still remain they would just tweak the unit into a regular hoplite
altough i believe a syracuse massillian alliance would rock with permanent stone forts to show that neither massillia nor syrace controled their regions but only their city´s and to have effective control of the region either bribe the rebels in the psf or conquer them :juggle2:
this reminds me can psf rebel ?? i mean seriously if they are to depict smaller cities they should be able to rebel to your cause :X
ofc one would have to have 2 bars about public order one in the main city and one in the surrounding area (region)
I understand that. But thats like having a Spartan faction without having Spartan Hoplites.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbin
Dude, it's a Greek city state; what do you expect? The standard hoplite wouldn't be any different from any other. Do you think the Successors should have different standard phalangites just because they're different states?
They do have different 'standard' phalangites... the only one they all share are the Pezheteroi which are rather highend units. Bad example?
But yeah the point is that the Greek City hoplites were very similar and differed only in name only. I rather get a realistic pushing hoplite phalanx rather than work on an underhanded hoplite spear animation.
I think underhand will probably very quickly disappear from the majority of units still using it in EB1. I posted this a while back for those of you who haven't seen it: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=116254
What underhand spears are there besides those for the ('pseudo) phalanx units like Phalangites, Iph. Hoplites, Alpine Phalanx, German Phalanx, and other units like those are in EB1?
Last I checked there were a couple - some of the levies for the Celts too. It's been a while since I've actually played the game so I can't remember them all off hand. Why, don't you play the game?
I do, I've just never used them I guess :-p.
Many Arab, Alpine, Germanic and Celtic units use underhand spears in EB I. Generally speaking, alll tribal militia units and spear-equipped skirmishers use underhand spears.
As do the majority of "middleweight" spear-carrying types all over the map, from assorted Celts and Africans to assorted Easterners and Arabs to assorted Indians.
Yes, only exception for the Germanics is the Gaut spearmen from Scandinavia and the Celtic-Germanic spearmen.Quote:
Originally Posted by athanaric
Would make sense for all spearmen to go overhand (except those who clearly didn't like pikemen and speude Phalanxes) if it clearly overs an advantage with underhand. In one on one combat I'm a bit unsure what would give you an advantage, seems to me that both would be usefull.
In one-on-one and diverse special situations (countering cavalry springs to mind) warriors doubtless switched between the two as needed, but for overall mass combat in close order one would assume overhand was by and large preferred - if only because it rather cut down on accidentally broken noses and poked eyes in the rear ranks. AFAIK in thin lines the rear-rankers can use the underhand style, held quite high at around shoulder level, to stab quite effectively past and between the front-rankers, but obviously even trying to depict this kind of situation-dependent detail under the various limitations of the engine is a *rather* stillborn idea...
BTW, don't the infantry of both sides mainly wield their spears overarm in the Bayeux Tapestry ? Not really all *that* relevant as such, but shieldwall is shieldwall...