That is all.
User forget to put an 'r' in the title. Don't forget to add an article to what you are referring to next time as well!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17025000 - T
Printable View
That is all.
User forget to put an 'r' in the title. Don't forget to add an article to what you are referring to next time as well!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17025000 - T
because he died in Game of Thrones? Or nearly every other movie he ever starred in? :P
that is a gratuitous insult to Sean Bean sir!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
He's just a self-important little liberal to whom nobody should pay attention. Seanny-boy, go back to making crappy movies and leave international politics to the professionals.
ah... ye XD my mistake. who is sean penn?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin
ah that guy. whats wrong with him?
Why are you being mean about the original James Bond? I loved him in Dragonheart. And just the way he says "Pussy Galore" in Goldfinger makes me laugh every time.
Took you a while to spin up IA. Fen Foggle has already suggested he be fed to Crodiles.
Alos, the Gruniad let him write this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ed?INTCMP=SRCH
He seems to miss a couple of salient points, the least of which is that Dauntless has gone to replace an older Frigate. It has to be a Daring-class ship there now because we need to be able to credibly protect Mount Pleasant from bombing because we have no carriers operational.
Well the more misguided, misinformed rubbish he spouted I thought, "hang on, this blokes a cock".Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
So I thought I'd post my innermost thoughts here.
Just saying like. :o)
I know the user made a typing mistake, but try to be careful with those titles, I had to edit every single reply so far!
There was no mistake. That's exactly what Sean Penn is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiaexz
Reminds me of that movie where he gives money to the Black Panthers and suggests renaming them the Zebra's. lol.
Didn't know he had those views in RL.
I don't get why the liberal left is siding with Argentina over this, the country which had a military junta try to overrule a peoples right to self-determination.
guy is an oxygen thief.
there is perfectly good air being wasted that could have provided valuable succor to such worthy creatures as hugo chavez.
it is a disgrace!
This is the same guy who went to Iraq in 2002 and was quite shocked to find it was a Stalinist dictatorship.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfhylwyr
No!
Surely not.
Hypocracy and.....
Will there be war between the UK and Argentina? Does the UK want Argentina as a colony?
is he an important politician in the UK?
Depends Hus, it'd be political suicide for any party to agree to give away the Falklands. It would also be hard to justify not sending troops there after the ones that died last time and the amount of resources we've spent in Afghan and Iraq.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Added to that, there might be oil there, so no way will give them up, and even without carriers I reckon we could take Argentina. I'm no expert but I don't think they've upgraded their military since the 80's and one thing we can say is that we have a lot of battle trained troops with recent combat experience.
lets conquer that **** for the queen, saint jorgé and the Union Europé
I saw the name of the Argentinian president. *Google imaging*... Hot damn.
The title mistake was pure karma :laugh4:. Last I saw, the male chicken was running a refugee camp in Haiti. Now that he's fixed that place, and is probably getting bored, it's on to the next crusade.
If the people of the Falklands wish to remain part of the UK, then Argentina and the male chicken should stuff it.
Part of the problem, one suspects, is that Obama begs to differ. All that would be needed to end this is for the US to throw its weight behind the right of the Falklanders to self-determination, but it won't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hosakawa Tito
The last I heard we weren't a state yet, so Abomber can think what he likes
Falklands are not part of the United Kingdom, they come under "Dependent Territory" where they chose to depend on Britain opposed to alternatives. Falklanders requested not to be part of Argentina and the British Government for reasons refuse to allow them to be part of Britain. So they are sort of a random stretch of land who are protected by Britain.
Dead Man Walking... Mystic River... Milk... the guy is a very talented actor and I give him credit for sticking around in Haiti long after the media, Hollywood, and the world lost interest. When you travel around the third world, it is very easy to fall into an anti-Western/colonialist mindset and the kind of black and white world view that dictates that what isn't Western must therefore be good. For example, Chavez seems like a complete crock (~;)) until one reads up on things such as Operation Condor, and then his excesses seem a bit more justified. He should stick to perfecting his craft and raising awareness for charitable causes.
I thought the British Nationality Act 1983 provided them with British citizenship?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiaexz
I thought it was the British Dependency Citizenship they got, unless their family was from Britain itself?
That 1983 act provides citizenship for anyone stripped of it in 1981, note the dates. The 1983 Act was a direct result of the War, where the 1981 Act was a concession to Argentinia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiaexz
Which was Superseded by the British Overseas Territories Act 2002.
God **** this is the most reasonable post in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
Were you reading my mind?Quote:
Originally Posted by Furunculus
He has always been a poster boy for legalizing postpartum abortion.