3 Attachment(s)
Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
Have you guys heard about the Disney remake of TOS? They needed to make some subtle changes to the characters to make them more original and relevant, but I like what I see.
Attachment 18835
Attachment 18836
Attachment 18837
I don't know about you, but I think the characters look a lot more exciting and interesting this time around.
Re: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
Nah, that is not Disney-ish stuff. Must be some other studio.
Re: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gregoshi
Nah, that is not Disney-ish stuff. Must be some other studio.
Don't forget, Disney put out Apocalypto. ~;)
Re: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
So when did Disney buy CBS or Paramount?
Re: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
About the same time he drank enough to forget Kirk putting his Captains rod into any alien with a vagina. Or that Tasha was a robo-sexual. Or that Quark ran a holographic brothel. Or that Tom Paris made programs with sexy-time bits in them.
Also Discovery is not a TOS remake. At most it's TOS's DS9/Voyager. It just happens to use rejected concept art of the Movie refit for the Enterprise.
Re: Star Trek 2016 *adult references*
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lars573
About the same time he drank enough to forget Kirk putting his Captains rod into any alien with a vagina. Or that Tasha was a robo-sexual. Or that Quark ran a holographic brothel. Or that Tom Paris made programs with sexy-time bits in them.
Also Discovery is not a TOS remake. At most it's TOS's DS9/Voyager. It just happens to use rejected concept art of the Movie refit for the Enterprise.
Who's talking about Discovery?