3D unit previews have started.
http://www.totalwar.com/community/medieval2.htm
Printable View
3D unit previews have started.
http://www.totalwar.com/community/medieval2.htm
Oh he looks nice.
Very nice even.
Why does he have yellow on his right side?
heraldry? perhaps mercenary companies like the Free Companies and the Catalan Grand Company could be introduced...
i like the looks o'this fella, an upgrade from the Swabian Swordsmen perhaps.
Ultras,Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultras DVSC
I suspect that some of the repeating factions in M2TW will utilize the same colors as they did in MTW. Being a German/HRE unit, I am guessing that's the case here: There are two colors on the Zweihander's armor, black and yellow -- the HRE's colors in MTW.
I must say he looks like pretty nifty. In a beheading sort of way. :skull:
Cheers,
G. le B.
Nice. A good start actually. I don't think anyone can complain about that one.
I must say that it is looking very good indeed! There are no extra belts or bulky armour to make him look exciting. Displaying faction colours are always tricky with an unit that is supposed to be in full plate. The only remark I have is that normally the plackart was not coloured and the armour beneath it could have (brigandine), but that is nitpicking with such lovely detailed armour.
2 thumbs up for the artist :2thumbsup:
For some reason, my computer would not let me see the link from the MT2W page. In case anyone is having the same problem, here's the direct link:
http://www.totalwar.com/community/med23d1.htm
Looks good, im eagerly awating to see the mounted knight though
Big knive.
Very nice indeed. The armour even seems a bit 'too large' so that he can fit padded armour underneath.
I certainly can see nothing wrong with that one. Looks fine to me, very nice units and an indication perhaps of how CA are looking at their units this time.
That unit is the very first one that I don't find anything to change , it is simply great and perfect , I dunno for historicity , but I am sure few modders around can make something better ....
Looks nice. I assume a unit of these guys isn't going to be too closely packed, or they'd be cutting off each other's heads while swinging that thing around. Or did they mostly use vertical strokes? It will be interesting to see how they animate this.
I've heard these blokes would use their swords to chops the points off pikes. Was that indeed the case?
Very interesting.....very interesting indeed *evil smurk*
I like it, even has the bit above the hilt for when they choked up on the blade for really close fighting (didn't have room to swing)
Very nice.
also note how the sword casts a shadow on the model itself. I assume this will happen ingame aswell. Not that my PC will be able to show such detail...
Nice unit... The zombification has started.
The thing I wish to see is special gallery that illustrates CA work on AI improvement. Something like EB threads about new formations and how certain factions use it. Well, there should be not necessary stories about formations, but something to prove that AI is really getting better... Like "photos of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction" which that American general (don't remember his name now) shown on UN conference on the eve of American invasion in Iraq.
Seems like new game will leave you out of your modding business. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PROMETHEUS
I think you are mistaking it with the shoulderstrap he has that goes over his right shoulder (keeps up the heraldry?).Quote:
Originally Posted by [cF]Adherbal
yep, the typical role for zweihanders was attacking pike blocks. The landsknecht companies in the early 16th century made extensive use of these men. Because of the risk they took (first troops to attack), they were paid double wages, hence their nickname 'doppelsoldner'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Furious Mental
I hope the developpers can maintain the high standard they set for creating other units.
I think he means the shadow on the helmet's right half. It's quite visible while turning the model around.Quote:
I think you are mistaking it with the shoulderstrap he has that goes over his right shoulder (keeps up the heraldry?).
Ahhh... now I see.
I am not a medieval warfare expert. That's why I ask now: In MTW days everybody complained, that actually units, using swords as their primary weapons, were very rare. Now, as we have this nice zweihander everybody is accepting it. I am a little bit confused :dizzy2: What's up with these zweihanders? Also, is this something like a man-at-arm?
(No bashing, only question)
Its a bit different to guys with just swords and shields. Mo'fo's with Longswords were fairly common in northern Europe.
Well, the swordsmen we saw in MTW as common footsoldiers weren't historically correct. Most footmen were commoners and couldn't afford heavy armor or expansive weapons like swords. But the Zweihänders were a developement of the 15th century to counter pikes. Due to the prevalence of pikes and the scarceness of heavy war horses in that time many knights chose to fight afoot. Some joined mercenary companies and then usually fought as Zweihänders.Quote:
Originally Posted by ivoignob
How about that. Because I always thought two handed swords were basically ceremonial weapons.Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Saturnus
I guess the swords were extra long so they could cut off pike heads without getting too close? Not a job I would much fancy myself though, even with a suit of armour.
They were not all ceremonial weapons. I have a reproduction of a Landsknecht-Zweihänder and it's rather plain. Not something you'd use for a ceremony.Quote:
Originally Posted by screwtype
I guess a long heavy sword is more usefull against pikes. Not an easy job indeed, that's why they were paid double.
Looks nice otherwise, but I think the Zweihander is a bit anachronistic. That type of very large two-handed sword was mainly used in the pikeman armies of Renaissance as an "assault weapon" against pike thickets (and to oppose other such shock troops, natch; halberds were at least as popular in that role too), whereas the very widely used long-, bastard- and "great" swords of the Late Middle Ages (to which period the man's armour points; he certainly lacks the eye-watering gaudiness of the Landsknecht) were rather different beasts.
The sword typology of the ARMA, although not perfect, explains the issue fairly well.
Parts of his armour design (such as an apparently complete lack of solid shoulder guards, and the upper arm plates going under the mail sleeves) also look a little odd, but not excessively so. People tried some pretty crazy schemes after all, and often weren't in the position to be excessively picky.