Swords and Sorcery Mafia Without the Swords [Concluded]

Difficulty in posting as fluently and freely as I do when I am town. I shortened my posts at the beginning of this game and stopped saying as much of what was on my mind as I usually do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Difficulty in posting as fluently and freely as I do when I am town. I shortened my posts at the beginning of this game and stopped saying as much of what was on my mind as I usually do.

---

Did you find it was a deliberate shortening, cutting of your thoughts? Or was it more that it was harder to have those longer, more detailed thoughts?

I should never post when I'm short on sleep. This isn't going to help me in this game and it's not going to help me in future ones either.

I'm not talking about it anymore.

Visor, if you're still here give me a read on Monty. He apparently thinks we have w/w equity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Visor, if you're still here give me a read on Monty. He apparently thinks we have w/w equity.

---

I don't have one.

That's helpful.

Three people are voting me right now: Montmorency, Snerk, and Dp101. I think the odds one of them is scum are pretty high.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Visor, if you're still here give me a read on Monty. He apparently thinks we have w/w equity.

---

Slightly scummy on post basis, but slightly towny on meta basis.

Explain what you mean by that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

That's helpful.

---

That's what I'm here for. :laugh4:

If I see something that stands out either way I'll mention it.

Why are you reading atheotes town?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Well, first, like Lewwyn said, you could also be a scumbuddy defending a townie for buddying points and townpoints if Winston flips town. I also think you look scummier than Winston right now, and I think that you wolf/Winston town is more likely than you town/Winston wolf.

In any case, if you're both scum, why does it matter which one of you I decide to vote for? I need to lynch both of you, and he only had one vote on him and was getting lots more attention than you.

---

Bolded is super villagery btw.

Choxorn as the purest poster in the game right now, who'd have guessed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Why are you reading atheotes town?

---

I thought his entrance was villagery. His reaction to my vote + posts after that entrance felt villagery to me. Free flowing, agendaless posts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Explain what you mean by that.

---

Monty is slightly scummy to me based on his earlier disappearance and incorrect comment about the timing of the deadline, though I suppose that could be attributed to whatever ails him. I don't like his role fishing.

He also says Zack is lying about lynchproof, which is either a lie or based on what he's experienced. I know for a fact that lynchproof was an available spell (Tier 4 6 mana cost). Either he's lying (monty is a good liar) or he's telling the truth and didn't know that was a spell. If he's not lying then he is less likely to be scum as it stands to reason that Jabbz may not have given the full list of spells to everyone based on how many mana points they had. IE: Tier 4 spells cost 6 mana, if you have less than that, Jabbz may not have offered them. In this case, Monty has 5 or less mana, but if he were scum he likely would have seen all the spells via shared communication with scumbuddies (possibly)

Again Jabbz has stated we can't break the game through meta, but I do think my ideas are possible.

However, again Monty could be lying, and I don't know if he'd make that lie, unless it was a joke, of course.

I'm wary of atheotes these days. He's gotten past my day one radar in two recent scum games of his (I never evaluated past day one because the turdface killed me n1 both times). I agree his opening looks fine (better than at least one of those scum games; I don't remember the other), but I'm not confident.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lewwyn

Monty is slightly scummy to me based on his earlier disappearance and incorrect comment about the timing of the deadline, though I suppose that could be attributed to whatever ails him. I don't like his role fishing.

He also says Zack is lying about lynchproof, which is either a lie or based on what he's experienced. I know for a fact that lynchproof was an available spell (Tier 4 6 mana cost). Either he's lying (monty is a good liar) or he's telling the truth and didn't know that was a spell. If he's not lying then he is less likely to be scum as it stands to reason that Jabbz may not have given the full list of spells to everyone based on how many mana points they had. IE: Tier 4 spells cost 6 mana, if you have less than that, Jabbz may not have offered them. In this case, Monty has 5 or less mana, but if he were scum he likely would have seen all the spells via shared communication with scumbuddies (possibly)

Again Jabbz has stated we can't break the game through meta, but I do think my ideas are possible.

However, again Monty could be lying, and I don't know if he'd make that lie, unless it was a joke, of course.

---

Thanks.

Lewwyn v.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Lewwyn v.

---

I'm leaning that way. Why?

Very thorough reasoning behind his initial comment on Monty, probably hard to fake if it doesn't really exist.

His comments previous to that showed a lot of thought too.

I don't know about Lewwyn. He looks pretty good rn. I'm getting tired of Zack not answering my question though.

Vote: Kcaz

I don't remember if I have to unvote.

What we can safely say is that we didn't all have the same potential spells. I didn't get a lynch spell offered to me and the level 4 spell I had available did not cost 6 mana.

I'm fairly sure we didn't all get the same spellbooks and some people probably got unique spells.

I ALSO think that its probably not wise to share what you have because that information is fairly useful for scum. (Also its kinda unfun).

Whilst we can still extract post numbers from the thread unlike now in CFC, there is a large minimum width to the window to reveal the actual post counts, which old CFC never had.

I also certainly wasn't planning to reveal my spells. ~;)

There's only six hours to go or so and Al still hasn't posted more than once, which is a much better reason to give him my vote than my early random-vote. Vote: Al Sipsclar.

(Apologies for the edit above - I was trying to respond to Visor's ninja-post, but too slowly it seems.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arakhor

Whilst we can still extract post numbers from the thread unlike now in CFC, there is a large minimum width to the window to reveal the actual post counts, which old CFC never had.

I also certainly wasn't planning to reveal my spells. ~;)

---

Don't edit your posts Arakhor, says in the OP.

I got that, yes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arakhor

There's only six hours to go or so and Al still hasn't posted more than once, which is a much better reason to give him my vote than my early random-vote. Vote: Al Sipsclar.

(Apologies for the edit above - I was trying to respond to Visor's ninja-post, but too slowly it seems.)

---

LOL.

Now I've been ninjaed.

If two ninjas stab each other in the woods, does anyone hear a sound? :creep: