Swords and Sorcery Mafia Without the Swords [Concluded]

[Arakhor]

Whilst we can still extract post numbers from the thread unlike now in CFC, there is a large minimum width to the window to reveal the actual post counts, which old CFC never had.

I also certainly wasn't planning to reveal my spells.

[Arakhor]

There's only six hours to go or so and Al still hasn't posted more than once, which is a much better reason to give him my vote than my early random-vote. Vote: Al Sipsclar.

(Apologies for the edit above - I was trying to respond to Visor's ninja-post, but too slowly it seems.)

[Visor]

There's only six hours to go or so and Al still hasn't posted more than once, which is a much better reason to give him my vote than my early random-vote. Vote: Al Sipsclar.

(Apologies for the edit above - I was trying to respond to Visor's ninja-post, but too slowly it seems.)

LOL.

Now I've been ninjaed.

[Arakhor]

If two ninjas stab each other in the woods, does anyone hear a sound?

[Visor]

Got any thoughts outside of Al, Arak?

[Arakhor]

I already posted most of my views so far in #239.

Other than those, Montmorency's role-fishing is clearly suspect and not just because it's anti-fun. I'm not sure what to make of the idea that at least one person had a lynch spell available - I can't decide whether that's more likely to be villagery or not.

[Renata]

Dislike your last sentence there Arakhor. Can't quite say why.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Other than those, Montmorency's role-fishing is clearly suspect and not just because it's anti-fun. I'm not sure what to make of the idea that at least one person had a lynch spell available - I can't decide whether that's more likely to be villagery or not.

Actually this could also fit in with my most recent post as well. Arakhor, can you walk me through precisely why you consider Monty's actions here suspect?

Unrelated, but both atheotes and Al Sipsclar not coming back is worrysome.

[Renata]

Worrisome*

That was one of my kid's spelling words yesterday.

[Dp101]

Actually this could also fit in with my most recent post as well. Arakhor, can you walk me through precisely why you consider Monty's actions here suspect?

Unrelated, but both atheotes and Al Sipsclar not coming back is worrysome.

Do you think that their lurking is alignment indicative? They both always seem to be kind of low posters, so I don't see what you think is so out of the ordinary with this.

[Arakhor]

Actually this could also fit in with my most recent post as well. Arakhor, can you walk me through precisely why you consider Monty's actions here suspect?

Well, apart from the fact that trying to prompt a full role-reveal on Day One (you know, before anything has happened) is just disrespectful to the designer's work, it was the inept way he went about it. Vigilantes shouldn't reveal, thereby suggesting that those who don't reveal have vig powers, but doctors, role-blockers and other town power roles should reveal, because of course the scum will be nice enough not to take advantage of that.

In summary: it's un-fun, inept and counter-productive either way, but it's not necessarily scummy, no.

[Visor]

Whilst we can still extract post numbers from the thread unlike now in CFC, there is a large minimum width to the window to reveal the actual post counts, which old CFC never had.

I also certainly wasn't planning to reveal my spells.

Don't edit your posts Arakhor, says in the OP.

[Arakhor]

I got that, yes.