When I first found out about that parasite I had nightmares (I was about 15 at the time).Quote:
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV
Printable View
When I first found out about that parasite I had nightmares (I was about 15 at the time).Quote:
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV
Quote:
Originally Posted by HopAlongBunny
that is islam, this thread is suppose to be bible. Read op for biblical answer.
read opQuote:
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV
total relism's MO:Quote:
Originally Posted by total relism
1. Unable to answer question?
2. "read op".
“Free will does however not exempt from any consequences.” Ah, the same free will that have the abused women at home. “But darling, I don’t want to beat you up. I love you. But you force me to beat you up because you don’t do as you are told, you don’t freely obey the Rules I imposed so I am obliged to beat you up… And you love me too, or I will take care of the second eye...”
Jesus doesn't beat women... couldn't resist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenus
But yeah, men are free to beat up women if that's their fantasy. Consequences for such is not.
It is the religious answer to free will. You are free to choose damnation and likewise choose liberation. But the small writing says damnation is default unless you utter "Jesus is Lord" (Christianity).
Even the most pious person, the most innocent infant is damned by default without Jesus. This is my understanding of Christian salvation. But according to Calvinism you are predestined to damnation whether you choose it or not. Likewise those predestined to salvation. Its a rigged system.
Pannonian MOQuote:
Originally Posted by Pannonian
1] dont read op, than post on thread
2 objection answered on op so ignore.
I have to honest, I prefer Supernatural (TV shows) approach to it all. It is basically a parallel universe where mythology, legends and religion are all true.
i prefer there be no god and i decide truth and what i want to be true,were party and adultery are good things. That is utill the day b-4 i die, than i want their to be haven with me included no matter what.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiaexz
What's wrong with partying?
Same question. And with adultery if partners are willing?
They pray to a wine creating deity who even feasts when he's about to get killed, so I guess there can't be much wrong with partying according to their religion...Quote:
Originally Posted by Hax
That's easy - when you get married you promise not to commit adultery.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenus
Want to have lots of sexual partners?
Don't get married.
Want to get married?
Don't complain.
Isn't sex before marriage against Christian beliefs?Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
So is killing - but the Templars did a lot of killing keeping the roads open in the Holy land (and not just Muslims).Quote:
Originally Posted by Moros
Adultery is a far worse sin than "fornication". The Former involves one person breaking an oath, which is one of the greatest sins for a Christian, and it harms the cuckold despite them having done nothing wrong. Adultery also often leads to violence, family breakup, not uncommonly people are injured or murdered, sometimes the children also.
The issue around sex is something that has bothered the clergy but it honestly wasn't a big deal until the Renaissance.
Read Dante's Inferno, see where "lust" is in Hell as compared to betrayal.
"That's easy - when you get married you promise not to commit adultery." Only in the Religious ones. The Laic one, you promise to rise yours kids and to help each others (well, if I remember well, as it was a long time ago).
My guess you are not married... :sneaky:Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenus
It's not because the Scandinavians forgot how to oppress women, everybody else did. ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigurd
Twice...~;)
Well, technically its believed the proper translation of the original text was "thou shalt murder" not "thou shalt not kill."Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla