Printable View
Haha, Good videos.
It's nice to see kids who want to come to America think we cloned Bin Laden so he would take credit for 9/11 that the jews orchestrated, and who think that "the west has stolen everything" from the arab world but still want to come to the west anyway. They will fit right in.
It was the European right which clamoured for mass immigration.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Why? Because it is cheaper to keep wages down by the threat of foreign influx of labour, than to invest in R&D. The costs for the latter are direct, costs for the first are for society at large. That why Japan saw such a technological rise, and the West turned itself into a cheap workshop that not two decades later discovered it would never be as cheap as emerging countries.
The left, the trade unions, resisted mass immigration in the fifities, sixties, seventies. What the left did do, was adopt social justice in the 1970s. We brought them over, so they argued, so we can not simply discard them when we've got no more use for them. Slash-an-burn economy is for the right, they can treat the environment, individuals like that, but not entire ethnic groups, not in the social climate of Europe of the 70s/80s, when the trauma of Europe's crimes of WWII and colonialism pressed heavily on Europe's conscious.
It's not a thread until you've been accused by me of destroying the world by your ignorance or even your very existence. :smash:Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian II
Where's the fun if we all agree Frags is wrong?
Little correction there, there was a need for workers. There was not a need for the workers to stay and import their entire family, but the left made sure that happened
Righty said it first, HoreTOre - that's why the Victorians had poor houses.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
I plead guilty, Your Honour. :shame:Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
AII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
Wrong Japan raised it's tech profile through using Western methods and practices these were chiefly developed by the USA during WW2 to service the war economy.
After the war the West (in reality the US alone) just rested on it's laurels and allowed Japan catch up by not implementing correctly the very wartime ideas it had developed.
Lean manufacturing sometimes called the Toyota production System in reality developed by the USA long before them.
However I would agree that Japan as a society has decided to achieve growth and stability through investment in R&D in order to overcome resource scarcity.
It is no coincidence they are top dog in robot when you think on it for a bit, scarcity means they don't have extra workers or materials to waste.
This led eventually to the Japan scare from the 80s caused mainly by American car companies thinking they were competing on price and not quality.
See Frags, We're winning!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
At the end of the day you can't stop sex and booze. Life is to short and very few people have that big a stick up their ass.
Sir, you may consider yourself siggied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
AII
We get the enjoyment of sitting down with a snack and watching as the Europeans drown themselves in hatred and bigotry until finally they have done something so unspeakable that we have to step in.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gutmensch
I hope he isn't focusing on high school kids. I styled myself a Fascist during my senior year mostly to explore the myth that it was a superior form of government. Turns out that it's great if you want to forge an empire but I'd rather be without it; too socialist. I'm more of a laissez faire guy myself. Less fearmongering and sentimental leftism will allow those kids to explore their fantasy of utopia. World travel will do them some good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leet Eriksson
I'm more worried about that Dutch reporter. Why was he alone with that 16 year old girl (with an AMAZING sweater). Wow, this really reminds me that I need to pack my bags for hell.
So, what you asked me earlier was whether I considered mor islamisation good or bad?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
I will make this perfectly clear: I consider every advancement of any religion to be a horrible crime against humanity. Islam of course falls under the term "religion". I see no positive thing in any of the worlds religions. No, not buddhism either, even though I know how hip it is to say good things about buddhism.
Religion poisons the mind and corrupts society. I dream of the day when we are finally rid of that stinking corpse.
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
During the 60's and 70's, most europeans still had free immigration. This meant that third-worlders, notably pakistani's, came here to work a couple of years, then they returned home as rich men.
But the racist European right could not stand to see brown people in its streets, its homes, its workplaces. The brownies had to go! Thus, in the late 70's and early 80's, europe closed shop. All the countries halted immigration to 0, which is where it remains today. Contrary to popular belief, it is not legal to migrate to a european country. What this meant, is that the immigrants who had planned on going home the next year suddenly decided to stay. If they went home, they could bever go back, their door to an econpmically viable future would be forever closed. So, they stayed. And as they would never go back, they brought their spouses, their families, and settled down.
Previously, we had working, young males who came here for a couple of years, then returned home. Thanks to the wonderful insight of the European racist, we forced them to settle down and bring the rest.
I blame lobotomy.
Well just think up summit else to argue aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
See Strike, Fragony is right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
There is such a thing as illegally enforced Sharia law in Western countries. I say that whipping serves the convert right for converting to a brutal religion:
An Australian convert to Islam was pinned down and lashed 40 times for drinking alcohol by a group of Muslim men who broke into his home to punish him for breaking sharia law, a court heard Tuesday.
The man, 31, was allegedly restrained and whipped with a cord in his Sydney house Sunday morning by four men who forced their way in after he went out for drinks with friends.
I love arguing, why would I dislike religion because it causes arguing?Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
No Frags is wrong, Do some use sharia law for their own ends. Yes. However some also beat the shop owner for extortion money.
Simply becuase it is happening (IMO on a much smaller scale than Frags apocolyptic dream where all the clogs are thrown into the North Sea) does not mean there is a fundamental shift in law or how it is apllied. It means there is a crime being commited and the perps should be brought to justice. I can run my own kangroo court just as well as the next guy but it means jack all.
That is the point here, I am surprsied so many people are running for the hills simply becuase a few immigrants decided to play rule of law.
Yeah and the main point was that nobody was turning a blind eye to it. Muslims break the law, they are dealt with...
No, this instance the law got involved because it happened to a convert. That is, somebody who speaks the language, trusts the police, understands the system, is not socially vulnerable, does not feel socially obliged to a minority culture.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
Sharia rocks the French and Italian legal system, two high profile cases:
Quote:
France might not be the panacea either. Indeed in one very publicized case, last June, a French judge ruled in favor of a Muslim man who wanted the annulment of his marriage because his wife turned out not to be a virgin. What this decision amounted to was the endorsement of the repudiation concept. This decision triggered a huge outcry from politicians, and various organizations. In November, a French court of appeal overturned the decision. Interestingly, a large majority of French Muslims, about 80 percent are very secular and totally reject any kind of Sharia law being implemented in the homeland of human rights.
Quote:
In Italy, three members of a Brescia-based Maghrebi family (father, mother and eldest son) were accused of beating up and sequestering their daughter/sister Fatima because she wanted to live a "Western" life.
In the first trial, the three were sentenced for sequestration and bad treatment. The court acknowledged that the teenager was "brutally beaten up" for having "dated" a non-Muslim and in general for "living a life not conforming with the culture" of her family. But on appeal, the family was acquitted because the court deemed that the young woman was beaten up for "her own good." The Bologna public prosecutor's office then disputed the acquittal of the three accused parties, but the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed it and ruled in favor of the charged parties.
Interestingly two Italian political leaders on the opposite side of the political spectrum, Isabella Bertolini, vice president of the MPs of the right-wing party Forza Italia, and Barbara Pollastrini, a post-communist former minister agreed to condemn the Supreme Court decision: "This verdict writes one of the darkest pages of history of the law in our country."
Isabella Bertolini was upset that the court "allied itself with radical Islam" and Barbara Pollastrini is pushing for parliament to pass as soon as possible a law condemning violence against women: "Now more than ever, it is urgent to defend the rights of a large number of immigrant women victims of an intolerable patriarchal culture."
Muslim women were quick to denounce the supreme court's decision. Among them, Souad Sbai, president of the Organization of Moroccan Women in Italy.
Your first example is irrelevant and weakens the point your second example makes, Louis.
I should be able to annul my marriage on the grounds that I saw a blue bird flying past my window, if I so desire.
Eighty percent of French Muslims beg to differ.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
You are with the twenty percent religious fundamentalists. Fundamentalism which you loathe so much when found in white Christians. :smash:
Oh God, this thread is a complete riot. Best all week.
Hah!Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
An abrahamic religious fundamentalist who believes marriage is irrelevant and should be removed from society altogether? I challenge you to find one!
I don't need to state a reason to anyone else why I'm breaking up with my girlfriend. That is my decision, and my decision alone. Everyone else can sod it.
If my wive told me she was a virgin and she was not I would think that was grounds for an annulment.
Why would you want to marry a virign? Why is that trait being plyed as toattly awesome?
I mean yea yea, you need to know she is "pure" and the kids are yours .
Of course if we define virgin like people in Texas define virign we can still root around like a couple of old Coyotes in the henhouse
But do we really want to force people to live together when one of them obviously doesn't want to anymore...?Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Of course notQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Does "root around in the henhouse" have some different connatation in Norway
That part wasn't the one I was replying to ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Would it really be a nice thought that the girl you were with had been with lots of guys before you. I don't care if I'm superstitious it just don't like it. If I was with a girl I really loved then if I ever saw anyone she slept with before I would instinctively batter them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
And yeah I mean proper virgin not "American Christian Youth Group ear sex doesn't count" type virgin.
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
Practice makes perfect. I'll take the skank who blows my mind over the timid rock any day.
Rhy is a virgin. Virgins wish to be with other virgins. MOST people want to be with a sexual partner who actual knows about sex and won't bloody the sheets. It is a reality. Do you think girls want guys who have been with alot of other women? Talk about societal double standards. And lack of a maidenhood does not a harlot make and you should feel shame at assuming so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
Edit: Though Horetore a whore I do not want. Diseases can follow.
As long as there's no funny business going on while she's with me, I could not care less.
Different strokes for different folks. No worriesQuote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
very good foreplay IMOQuote:
And yeah I mean proper virgin not "American Christian Youth Group ear sex doesn't count" type virgin.
PERSONAL ATTACK!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
But did I display them or are you projecting?Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
And do you feel so good knowing how she blew all those other guys minds before you...Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Your numerous girl threads where you talk about how you want female companionship which being the young man that you are like includes boning speaks quite well of your double standards.
the only good i care about is mine own. why am i entitled to enjoying sex with multiple partners but this young girl is not and is labeled a whore by society if she engages in intercourse
Yes.
Edit: that was in response to Rhy's question of whether or not I felt good..... Curse you centurion, for posting while I write!!!
Why can't they all be so accepting. ~:mecry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
I've been using that smilie a lot recently...
Anyway, yeah... what I said is just my personal opinion. Other people have different values and will want different things.
But I only intend to be with one woman in my life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
Still I have always said sex is going to be an important part of a relationship and I don't buy the crap about it just being about personality. Now I might be a relinutjob as a certain Dutchman would say but that doesn't mean I'm superstitious about sex within marriage, in fact oddly enough it was the hardcore Puritan types that removed a lot of the superstitious surrounding sex in Christianity.
I'll admit that half the time the girls I like aren't of the type I would think of as the ideal but that's just how things work out and I'll be honest about it. In fact not one of the girls I've ever liked have been the typical nice Christian girl, heck at this rate who knows what quirky stuff I'll be into, I might even go interracial.
And so now "society" speaks for me does it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
a statement of fact does not include you per se. I simply stated that a girl who as many sexual partners as say myself would quickly be labeled as a whore. This is maybe the single most unfair double standard within gender roles today.
you sort of make me sick sometimes.Quote:
heck at this rate who knows what quirky stuff I'll be into, I might even go interracial.
Did I say something to offend you?!
the assumption that interracial love is quirky.
Maybe its just the forbidden factor.
Interracial marriages and sex is only forbidden in your ****** up world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
I myself am the product of interracial love
Well that was very brave to reveal that, I hope that they gave you a lot of support and that you were accepted in both communities.
Your kidding right.................. I mean you can't be freaking serious.
I mean otherwise what kind of ******* fantasy world are you living in from the rest of the western world?
Edit: I am just going to go with your pulling a troll since I remember dimly you doing something like this before. You really need to work on your delivery.
lmfao Rhy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBsSttJsZOc
Edit: I am also the result of interacial marrige. My mother and father are cousins
wait...Oh
i got a chuckle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
I love that movie. This is the thread that just keeps on giving.
Islam is the Wal-Mart of religions. It should make its new symbol the Crescent fashioned over a pair of sweat pants.
You all are ignorant beyond all belief. Once again I must come down from my very high horse and tell you all that there is no such thing as interracial sex, because we are all part of the same race...the human race. LOVE AND FLOWERS FOR ALL!
But I must also congratulate Cent as well for his hard work in being accepted despite his mulatto disposition. I sympathize with those whose fences are only partially whitewashed.
:insert middle finger smiley:
I'm not a black white mix :daisy:.
Obviously I got trolled but I don't know what exactly I did to receive any derision about it.
Why only in white Christians? Do you have something against black Christians, Louis? Are you saying for some reason blacks aren't good enough to be religious fundamentalist idiots? :stare:Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
AII
Quite the contraire in America actually. Quite a few African Americans in urban areas make up evangelical church goers. Evangelical churches attract the poor and desperate many of whom are sadly city dwelling african-americans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian II
You are conflating mainline black protastentism with evangelicals simply b/c the preachers yell a bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
I'm going to ask you nicely to stop
Otherwise I will be forced to bring facts into this debate
Not me. I will say that Horetore and his leftist multicultural self-loathing buddies do apply different standards to Whites or Christians as they do to Blacks or non-Christians.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian II
No I know the difference I am not talking about established Baptist churches or the like. I am talking about mega church televangelism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Hah!Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
And anyway, I would say that I'm non-cultural, not multicultural...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMR7ozVIKe4&feature=related
5 minutes from my house and lily white
Oh my you found an all white mega church. This I presume since the embedding was disabled....
You live in an area with very few African Americans if I had to guess and not near any truly large urban centers.
If you want to have one single example stand for your point I will have one single example stand for my point. Overblown though this man is and my point is not meant as a political jab I believe Jeremiah Wright's TUCC is a prime example.
EDIT: Also LMFAO. How lily white is 1:56?
Edit2: I also left a polite little comment (read disparaging and venomous) but I need to await approval first. God I loath these fundamentalist POS
San Antonio Texas is not a large urban area?Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
Meh TV audiences see a different portriat
How about you address the rest of my point...... I found a perfectly black church. Let us continue presenting one church each until I finally lose due to the overwhelming number of whites in america :rolleyes:
Also San Antonio has like 7% black which is about half the national average. And that is odd for a major metropolitan area.
As you all know, the Backroom is a deeply conservative and fundamentalist congregation policed by authoritarian zealots interpreting scriptural rules to suit themselves under the pretence of moral outrage.
This thread has descended into the worst kind of promiscuity, flirting - nay, penetrating - a whole range of sordid subjects with gay abandon. The original topic has been left weeping and violated as younger, more superficially attractive discussions flaunt themselves before the slavering and easily led.
This must stop. Virgins, black religions, intra-aural frottage will beemburka'dembargoed forthwith and all posters will return toMuslim bashingwhatever the subject of the OP was, in the finest traditions of the Backroom. Or start a gun rights thread.
Thank you kindly.
:bow:
Guns are good. I feel safe because of Henrietta by my side.
That must be one of the funniest things I've read at the Org. thanks for brightening my crappy day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
~:smoking:
:laugh4: This should be more prominently displayed, it helps explain what the Backroom is all about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
This thread delivers! Awesome, BQ!
Scientific article that shows Sharia is taking away your guns.Quote:
Islamic law, shari’a, forbids non-Muslims, known as dhimmi, from possessing arms and defending themselves from attacks by Muslims.1 The disarmament is one aspect of the pervasive civil inferiority imposed on non-Muslims, a status known as dhimmitude.2 This Article examines the historical effects of the shari’a disarmament, based on three books by Bat Ye‟or, the world‟s leading scholar of dhimmitude.3 As Ye‟or details, the disarmament has had catastrophic consequences, extending far beyond the direct loss of the dhimmis’ ability to defend themselves against Muslim attack.
The study of the disarmament provides an interesting historical example of negative interfaith relations. Yet, the disarmament story and the second-class status imposed on Christians and Jews have implications for the modern United States, where there is no shari’a law, but some subgroups of the population have been condemned, in effect, to a disarmed and defenseless status of civil inferiority. Perhaps the ancient tragedy of dhimmitude has something to teach us about the April 2007 tragedy at Virginia Tech University.
The dhimmis are labouring to disarm you. :yes:
I ignore everyone who uses the term "dhimmi".
It's just as idiotic as "goim".
Good point there.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
And kudos to Banquo's Ghost for another fine situationist intervention. :smash:
:bow:
AII
Why don't you Quisling adress the point instead? Why do you want to disarm us for the coming Muslim takeover?Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
We've been disarmed since the danes took the crown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
And why is that, it means the status of a second-rate citizen, religious apartheid, very un-class struggle if you ask me. Now I understand that in progressive circles it is blasphemy to critisize what haven't moved an inch in it's 1400 year's existance, but it remains a bit oddQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Because the term is used exclusively by raving loonies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
It's part of the ideoligy. I would rather call the leftist islamphilae 'islamo-clientism' because it wouldn't polute terminoligy, but dhimmitude is close enough and sounds betterQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Nothing deriding you specifically. It's just that the planning and execution of Rhy here was just superb. :2thumbsup: Look at how bad the Frontroom has gotten recently, rarely any good posts now, and Rhy pulls this out in the BACKROOM, which is a hundred times more hopeless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
thanks for missing the whole point. Yes one afghan guys opinion changes everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
So that sentiment is non-existant huhQuote:
Originally Posted by Leet Eriksson
Anders B also uses this term frequently.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
My point is proven.
Take a breathQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Its irrelevant, reread my post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
It's not irrelevant http://pewglobal.org/2011/07/21/musl...sions-persist/Quote:
Originally Posted by Leet Eriksson
Half believe the lack of prosperity is because of the west