x-post. Seriously, man, you're just accusing someone in public of tampering with the game to the point they're seriously considering quitting it. wth?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
Bye. Bed.
Printable View
x-post. Seriously, man, you're just accusing someone in public of tampering with the game to the point they're seriously considering quitting it. wth?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
Bye. Bed.
i know you struggle to read, but that is not what i am doing, i have explained it multiple timesQuote:
Originally Posted by El Barto
i am not saying he did it with ill intent either, whatsoever, just that in doing it it indicates he wasn't interested in reading the content of the post in a way i would expect a town to do
jfc what is wrong with you
el barto lynching over something he disagrees with over actually scumhunting is unfortunately not outside his town range right? i seem to remember that.
Stork, I have to seriously disagree here. He acted appropriately in an administrative capacity, even if it turned out he was jumping the gun.Quote:
it indicates he wasn't interested in reading the content of the post in a way i would expect a town to do
Dissociating from the person of GH, there is no reason to believe in general that a moderator scum with Riedquat would want to delete that post while a townie moderator would not. That's just wrongheaded.
i mean, i thoroughly disagree given i am a mod on another site so :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
if ried is a wolf with gh and ried goes into the thread to ate his way after a lynch, and gh deletes it without being asked by the game mod, it is peculiar.
i also 100% disagree with the bolded, and given the post is back in the thread that probably indicates something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Then ask, what would make GH delete any post? Has he done it before? Does it relate to the rules or culture followed in the Gameroom?Quote:
if ried is a wolf with gh and ried goes into the thread to ate his way after a lynch, and gh deletes it without being asked by the game mod, it is peculiar.
This is not a game tell.
because he isn't a wolf with reid and did it without thinking about the effect it has on the game because he isn't interested in solving the gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Or, what if he did and considered it irrelevant to his application of duty?
thats possible too, sureQuote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
but he is wrong then
in that case: if he is in a town team he makes a read on a post, but doesn't let his compatriots the same opportunity, is the point i was making
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
Then my point would be that whether or not you agree with his moderating - and, as I said, you could call it jumping the gun - it really can't be used as insight into the game mindset.Quote:
in that case: if he is in a town team he makes a read on a post, but doesn't let his compatriots the same opportunity, is the point i was making
You can, actually, but in that come dangerously close to the assumption that the moderator in question will happily use his powers in a way that he personally feels will benefit him in the game.
I suspect GH was particularly insulted by (what he sees as) the insinuations of inconsistency and outright manipulation.
(You're making me feel bad for pushing a GH lynch, quitting this line of reasoning is the healthiest thing to do ATM)
nah, i am very sure i said he did it unknowingly
Are you saying I'm completely wrong about who I think are wolves and how would you know if I'm right or wrong about anyone other than yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
Are you saying wolves are incapable of defending town? If anything, wolves have an easier time defending town because they actually know who town are.
I completely believe that you wouldn't want to kill Alette but it's a team game and I don't see you outright vetoing any kill if the rest of your team wants her dead.
Careless and inconsistent doesn't sound much better than actively malignant.Quote:
nah, i am very sure i said he did it unknowingly
but you were in a wolf team with me once :???:Quote:
Originally Posted by Newyn
what, yes it does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
one is actively cheating and one is just a simple mistake
...
1 wolf game isn't enough to get a clear picture of anyone's mentaility.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
...Quote:
Originally Posted by Newyn
what?
does the one wolf game make you think i play the opposite of how i played there in this game?
@Renata @Stork @Askthepizzaguy @BSmith @El Barto @Montmorency @GeneralHankerchief @Al Sipsclar @Zack @Choxorn @Newyn @atheotes @Riedquat
Please stop discussing MODERATOR ACTIONS that are outside the scope of the game. We are here to play mafia.
Official warning for everyone on that note.
I'm not sure whether you're playing the opposite to you're paying here. When I'm wolf, I don't pay too much attention to the playstyle of other wolves. What I do believe is that you'd probably argue strongly against Alette dying but you wouldn't outright veto it if your fellow wolves pushed strongly for it. Basically, it's probably unlikely but not impossible for you to be on a wolf team that killed Alette especially considering Alette is a very weird nk that I don't understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
yeah, but i mostly mean i posted ~thousands of times in wolf chat in that game so I would probably get my way about (not) killing alette if i did similar this gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Newyn
The squeaky cub gets the blubber?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork
i don't know exactly what you mean but sureQuote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
how does "unlikely but not impossible" fit with me being a wolf anyway newyn?
I didn't want to see it but I basically lock-cleared you based on the nightkillQuote:
Originally Posted by Stork
*say it
the rest of the posts after the one i just quoted were basically cancer