good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
i know you struggle to read, but that is not what i am doing, i have explained it multiple times
i am not saying he did it with ill intent either, whatsoever, just that in doing it it indicates he wasn't interested in reading the content of the post in a way i would expect a town to do
jfc what is wrong with you
el barto lynching over something he disagrees with over actually scumhunting is unfortunately not outside his town range right? i seem to remember that.
Stork, I have to seriously disagree here. He acted appropriately in an administrative capacity, even if it turned out he was jumping the gun.it indicates he wasn't interested in reading the content of the post in a way i would expect a town to do
Dissociating from the person of GH, there is no reason to believe in general that a moderator scum with Riedquat would want to delete that post while a townie moderator would not. That's just wrongheaded.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Then ask, what would make GH delete any post? Has he done it before? Does it relate to the rules or culture followed in the Gameroom?if ried is a wolf with gh and ried goes into the thread to ate his way after a lynch, and gh deletes it without being asked by the game mod, it is peculiar.
This is not a game tell.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Or, what if he did and considered it irrelevant to his application of duty?
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
but he is wrong then
in that case: if he is in a town team he makes a read on a post, but doesn't let his compatriots the same opportunity, is the point i was making
Originally Posted by Stork
Then my point would be that whether or not you agree with his moderating - and, as I said, you could call it jumping the gun - it really can't be used as insight into the game mindset.in that case: if he is in a town team he makes a read on a post, but doesn't let his compatriots the same opportunity, is the point i was making
You can, actually, but in that come dangerously close to the assumption that the moderator in question will happily use his powers in a way that he personally feels will benefit him in the game.
I suspect GH was particularly insulted by (what he sees as) the insinuations of inconsistency and outright manipulation.
(You're making me feel bad for pushing a GH lynch, quitting this line of reasoning is the healthiest thing to do ATM)
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
nah, i am very sure i said he did it unknowingly
Are you saying I'm completely wrong about who I think are wolves and how would you know if I'm right or wrong about anyone other than yourself?
Are you saying wolves are incapable of defending town? If anything, wolves have an easier time defending town because they actually know who town are.
I completely believe that you wouldn't want to kill Alette but it's a team game and I don't see you outright vetoing any kill if the rest of your team wants her dead.
Careless and inconsistent doesn't sound much better than actively malignant.nah, i am very sure i said he did it unknowingly
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
does the one wolf game make you think i play the opposite of how i played there in this game?
@Renata @Stork @Askthepizzaguy @BSmith @El Barto @Montmorency @GeneralHankerchief @Al Sipsclar @Zack @Choxorn @Newyn @atheotes @Riedquat
Please stop discussing MODERATOR ACTIONS that are outside the scope of the game. We are here to play mafia.
Official warning for everyone on that note.
I'm not sure whether you're playing the opposite to you're paying here. When I'm wolf, I don't pay too much attention to the playstyle of other wolves. What I do believe is that you'd probably argue strongly against Alette dying but you wouldn't outright veto it if your fellow wolves pushed strongly for it. Basically, it's probably unlikely but not impossible for you to be on a wolf team that killed Alette especially considering Alette is a very weird nk that I don't understand.
how does "unlikely but not impossible" fit with me being a wolf anyway newyn?
*say it
the rest of the posts after the one i just quoted were basically cancer
Bookmarks