Capo di Tutti Capi III [Concluded]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

HOS:ricera

How can you be that sure GH is guilty?

---

Because I'm not? If you re-read my post, the word sure isn't in there anywhere. I made it pretty clear I'm only voting because that's the best I believe I can go on at this point. As I said, I'd welcome any new evidence; my mind isn't made up.

And you didn't respond to my first question about FoS, either. Instead you put in a new acronym...

I'm not really inclined to believe your post was very serious as a result. :7reporter:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord Winter

@Pizza Your CA case relies on too many logical jumps and assumption to be considered as a lynch.

---

Fair enough, but that was just the in-thread behavior that I could point out to everyone. I mentioned (perhaps too briefly) that I was waiting on an actual result I could give you. I didn't think anyone would even listen to me if I just flat out claimed I had a result, I wanted to show you that there was something more to my case than just basically trusting my results.

I've argued for CountArach to take priority over the General here, but I believe I am being overruled on that point. That's fine, CountArach isn't going anywhere, I'm just saying I know what he's been up to and I know it's not townie stuff.

Kommodus pointed out a possible compromise, letting the Director decide. I am fine with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh

Director of the Committee of Vigilance:

On the first day phase, and then on each odd numbered day phase thereafter, the town elects the person who will direct the lynching effort. That person shall be director for the next two lynchings following their selection. [e.g. Elected Day 1, Director Day 2, Director Day 3, Elected Day 3, Director Day 4 & 5, etc.] That person will choose the lynching mode, carry out the lynching, and, in the event of a tie vote, the director will decide who among those tied for the most votes will be executed. The director can execute none, one, more, or all of those tied votees at the Director’s discretion. The Director is provided with a special goon squad to aid in the executions, and this squad also makes it impossible to kill the Director while they are in office. While directing the lynchings, the individual in question may not vote for anyone to be lynched, though they may help select the next director.

---

Important part bolded. I say if CA or GH can't come up with a decent response to these accusations, we have our esteemed Director hang em both.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord Winter

@Pizza Your CA case relies on too many logical jumps and assumption to be considered as a lynch. First of all how would Yarpolk know about the coded language from the start? Codes are only useful if they are pre planed and if they were there would be no point using them as recruitment. Furthermore there's no actual evidence that they actual exist. When your whole case basically comes down to CA making a rp post which Yaropolk happens to make an anti stalin comment off of. Is that scummy?

---

Last couple games have had clues to be left in the thread so that people could unite, and I think capo 2 did as well.

I'd still like an answer from woad&fangs as to why he wanted CountArach protected.

@Tratorix:

Hear, hear! I trust Reenk Roink's judgment on this matter.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

-personal note, I need to go offline for a while, this game is sucking me in and I need a real rest, seriously.-

We elected him, we should trust in his judgement then. It's not just about funny writeups, reenk is our noble leader!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

HOS:ricera

How can you be that sure GH is guilty?

---

Sasaki is right.

ToS: ricera

Something's really amiss here...
:idea3:

A tally, I mean.:yes:

Quote:

---

Tally: (unofficial)
Votes
CountArach: 10 - Askthepizzaguy, Beskar, White_eyes:D, Craterus, Sasaki Kojiro, El Diablo, Diana Abnoba, a completely inoffensive name, Double A, Jolt

GeneralHankerchief: 8 - Kommodus, Tratorix, spL1tp3r50naL1ty, TinCow, atheotes, Chaotix, ricera10, Gaius Scribonius Curio

woad&fangs: 4 - Shinseikhaan, scottishranger, Sigurd, LittleGrizzly

Sasaki Kojiro: 3 - GeneralHankerchief, gibsonsg91921, slashandburn

shlin28: 2 - Andres, Crazed Rabbit

A Very Super Market - Myrddraal

Select
Reenk Roink - IIIII IIiII IIIII IIII

GeneralHankerchief - iI

Kommodus - i
(will finish later...)

---

Finally... Now to concentrate on who to vote/select... (Perhaps working on a double-lynch does sound like a good idea. )
Time to reread, first:study: unless sleep takes me

*wakes up*

I believe you have GH voting for GH....

*back to sleep*

Vote: Beefy
'
The Case:

First of all lets remember Beefy survived a hit day one. Since we don't have a protection group claiming responsibility that means either his Luca stepped in or he was lucky. I'm guessing the Luca when you add in a few other pieces of information. Most importantly Beefy was part of the town protection group which failed to protect Pever. As I outlined in my other post we can probably assume that the problem with the protection group is in the defenders as opposed to any sabotage on the side of the organized vig group. Out of the three in the pever protection group only beefy is the only one with past suspicious behavior. His in thread behavior is textbook attention avoidance, adding nothing. He even abstained yesterday. In fact his behavior reminds me of GF3 and we all know what role he had then. All three of these factors together mean we have a good chance of getting a don.

You are confusing selections and votes me thinks.
Was talking to glyphz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJGingivitis

You are confusing selections and votes me thinks.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJGingivitis

Haha alright, I have been working on getting something concrete. There is something I have found out that I plan on revealing to everyone later tonight (Approx 2200-2400 CST) after I hear back from some people.

---

What happened to this, DJG?

Select: Reenk

Vote: Abstain

It turned to moot actually and with everything happening I figured I would concentrate on that. But I had suspicions regarding some protection group N1 and why they did not show up in the write up. That is all. After I dug deeper I figured out my mistake.

Select: Reenk

Select: Reenk Roink

too tired to make coherent accusations....will post again in morning....

one more thing: still need one or two volunteers for pt groups as we lost some people. Please and thank you.

Select: Reenk

Select: Reenk Roink

Who else but the Reenkster.

Vote: GH

ATPG, I like your case against CA. It does make a decent amount of sense. BUT, Kommo's feels.. more complete.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jolt

Taking into account that Reenk approached me on behalf of TheStranger asking if I wanted to participate in a vig group, offer which I rejected for not knowing whether TheStranger was Mafia or not, renders your "reveal" as me wanting to become Mafia quite the fail.

---

Do you now deny that you contacted FactionHeir and wrote what he quoted in this?
You knew a pro-town role and wanted to make a deal with who you believed was an original member of Stracchi? You are at least a name on the most wanted list for this.

I suggest a three way tie between GH, Jolt and CA and just get rid of them all.

EDIT: This might be my first serious post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat

Louis would not have mis-spelled 'L'Etranger'. It needed an accent aigu: 'L'Étranger'. :whip:

---

It's "l'Etranger" with a capital "E", the accent aigu is not needed :brood:

- étranger
- Etranger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

I was going to be townie but then Seamus insulted the pentangelini's in the prologue and I figured I'd show him how awesome we really are by getting the gang back together.

That went well... :skull:

---

:laugh4:

Select : Reenk
Unvote; Vote : GH

Vote: GH

This goes beyond for me more then Kommodus's case, and I hope we may tie it and be rid of both GH and CA. As is obvious, each day we gain more and more new information and new suspects, it is not good that they build a queue, as it strangles the committees efforts.

:furious3::furious3::furious3:

Now now Mr Mafia, why did you kill me! My exams are ending soon and I would have had all this lovely time to browse through Capo II 2 hours a day no longer... :cry:

:furious3::furious3::furious3:

My only comfort is that now the mafia will pay :laugh4:

omg... i was protected? dang that fool that failed to send in...

those cc'd pms are obviously a waste of time...

and I believe either pizza or reenk are playing all of us...

Yeah, cause Reenk is organising hits on players...

Select: Reenk
bring on the funny

I think my skim reading caused me to miss much more than I thought because while there are cases against both CA and GH they don't seem that solid

About CountArach being scummy, aren't the mafia families supposed to be Italian?

Is a Russian with the ability to kill necessarily scum?

CA needs to explain :whip:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andres

Is a Russian with the ability to kill necessarily scum?

---

'cause a random guy dressed like an ancient greek man isnt cause for concern...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord Winter

Vote: Beefy
'
The Case:

First of all lets remember Beefy survived a hit day one. Since we don't have a protection group claiming responsibility that means either his Luca stepped in or he was lucky. I'm guessing the Luca when you add in a few other pieces of information. Most importantly Beefy was part of the town protection group which failed to protect Pever. As I outlined in my other post we can probably assume that the problem with the protection group is in the defenders as opposed to any sabotage on the side of the organized vig group. Out of the three in the pever protection group only beefy is the only one with past suspicious behavior. His in thread behavior is textbook attention avoidance, adding nothing. He even abstained yesterday. In fact his behavior reminds me of GF3 and we all know what role he had then. All three of these factors together mean we have a good chance of getting a don.

---

Well, it may be my fault.

I received two results for the last night. The first one was to protect CountArach with two others who I will not name. This was done, because The Stranger gave us no commands.

Then after we received orders from The Stranger, I quickly sent in a different order to protect pever, and pmed the guy in the original protection group to look for somewhere else, as he seemed to have had no group.

As I also received the result for the first protection which was inconclusive as CA wasn't attacked, I am assuming, I missed a step of canceling night actions. If thats not necessary, then its someone else.

Yes I did abstain, but only because I have school. And I figure I better vote when I get back as there is more development.

Vote: GH