Printable View
I don't like it when people use words like "forever"; it is a shocking disregard for how long "forever" actually is. In this case, it also takes for granted the existence of the state, which is actually a very difficult thing to organize and keep functional. Tell me, do you think a state that experiences endless shootouts is functional? I don't know of a single state that has such things that existed in any form that is capable of holding such a title.Quote:
Originally Posted by HopAlongBunny
Misplaced pedantry. "Forever" is always used in a non-literal way unless it's in reference to something in physical science (or theology).Quote:
Originally Posted by CrossLOPER
Humanity is certainly not for ever. The solar system neither. Probably not even the universe. America will not even perdure co-eval with humanity, not America or any other country or culture.
Not exactly a "fun at parties" type response here Monty -- though it might work for a pick-up line with Emo chicks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Seems like some gun owners are taking matters into their own hands as far as reducing the number of guns in the US is concerned:
https://www.facebook.com/attn/videos/1665980036770782/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQX3RsAXN88
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKZnP9eADmA
My point is that this is part of a trend that cannot continue without undesirable results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
wow must be a trend if two vloggers do that. It disgusts me that they use this to shine, attention-whores they areQuote:
Originally Posted by Husar
That's full of faulty assertions, dear Frags. First of all, noone said it's a trend, and secondly it can't become one if the people who started it can't spread their message. You could say it's part of a general anti-gun thread started by the shooting at the Florida high school and the teenagers campaigning afterwards. I really don't know how you define attention-whore anyway, ist it just about whether you like the message or not? Is Trump an attention-whore, isn't every politician? What about Wilders, does he not want attention to get more votes? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
I think it's a good idea and especially the first guy explains his reasoning very well.
Besides, the first video has more than two, click the link because Facebook videos can't be embedded.
Populism is no dirty word for me, do you know how that word came to be. I have nothing with Wilders by the way I would never vote on him. Unlike some moralists I know some muslima's very well, every centimeter I could find. Why can't you understand that they are scared of things they can't control. You would be absolutily heartbroken if I told some things.
Girl on the bottom did it right. The guy in the top vid is probably faking it, cutting through the old-school barrel does not destroy anything, he can replace that with a fancy new barrel complete with rail system really easily. You have to destroy the lower receiver, which is the ATF-controlled part of the weapon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
I'm not sure how most of that relates to my post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
I can only guess that mentioning Wilders triggered you in some way.
I also thought the barrel might be easy to repair, but what he says sounds genuine. Maybe he's not even very educated on how to destroy a gun or whatever. I'm not sure it has to be fake when incompetence or wanting to make it fast for the video are also valid explanations.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
It isn't me who mentioned him, that was you. Yeah that triggers me as I have nothing to do with him, I support Thierry Boudet
Is this your new white supremacist waifu?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Waifu as in fuck you? I could of course tell my friends that I am a white-surpremist, they won't believe me though. It's probably new to my girlfriend as well, she never noticed it that I hate herQuote:
Originally Posted by CrossLOPER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hXVTX-Rg8s
He seems to be in favor of salon-nationalism because it sells better than asking for death camps right away.
And by the looks of it he is also on the leading edge in terms of grease levels in hair.
And Fragony, I mentioned him in a completely different context, it wasn't meant as an invitation for brainstorming everything you know about Wilders.
As for nationalism, I maintain my view that if you want nationalism, restrict corporations and investors to national borders as well. So no McDonald's outside the US and no Ikea outside Sweden. You can trade with Africa, but the Africans own all the mines. And if the Arabs can't produce the oil with their tech, you either sell it to them and educate their workers on the use, or you get no oil from them. You can't just demand no people come to your country, but your investors go there and own half their infrastructure and lobby their government. Because your foreign influence has no place in other countries either! :stare:
First sentence is really uncalled for. He is libertarist-lite, that's all. His good looks kinda work against himQuote:
Originally Posted by Husar
The triggering is strong, today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpBzt9PyU5w
I don't know man, saying that you want to see a sea of white flesh around you is kind of hard to misconstrue.
I should have stepped in earlier, but I am locking this. Maybe we can discuss guns and stuff again after the next massacre.
:dancinglock: