Utter bollox , also why are you avoiding the question.....Quote:
Under the fact that they suffered no physical harm.
What was the status of prisoners of the various categories ?
What changes were made by your government regarding that ?
Who had jurisdiction over those various categories of prisoners ?
Under what article of either US military law or the international conventions of the laws of war does "grunts" throwing prisoners out of a chopper not = a crime of war ?
Do you not like the answers , the answers that are set out by your government and your military .
My my, you do have a fertile imagination then don't you , or is it just that you are able to post exactly the same rubbish as O'Neil all by yourself .Quote:
No that came from me .
oh I see , so the Vietmanese singled out the chairman of the delegation about whose visit the exhibit was about , not because he was the chairman of the delegation , but because he spoke of atrocities carried out in Vietnam , and they singled him out so badly that they forgot to not put up pictures of the rest of the delegation .:dizzy2:Quote:
Nothing. Only against Kerry. Im not arguing why he went over there. Im just stating that the Vietnamese think he helped them win the war and thats why they singled him out and hung up his picture.
Well if you didn't care you wouldn't have tried to make the false claim that his was the only photo .Quote:
Who cares.
So what you mean by "who cares" is :oops: a bit of a screwup , made a big mistake . But instead of saying that the assertion was completely wrong it is now consigned to the irrelevant file .
Still I suppose it is better than the claim the swiftliars tried to make earlier , before they once again had to retract their bull excrement , which was that the picture was in an exhibition also featuring , not the veterans associations , not members of the general staff , not the delegation , but Jane Fonda:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: