I think I have a vague idea about this. Can I PM you for clarification?
Printable View
Sure. I believe I am 100% correct about this assumption.
:laugh4:
How was making me not able to vote balanced? :P
Needless to say, the manner in which I got lynched was quite funny. I didn't bold a vote for suicide, and got lynched because of it.
And throwing pawns away is going to do so much for any scum group's morale(!) Think, for once, I was winning, if I was scum I wouldnt throw my scumbuddy away to save the head of the town network.1:Because I dont want to die, noone should.Quote:
And why are you so terribly defensive and cowardly about yourself, trying to hide your retaliatory item and acting like it's such a threat the scum would kill you, all of the Innocents are in the same boat.
2: I decided to make it hard for reneta after I had posted to I edited it into something more vague. It. Was. For. Fun.
That would be hard to do because I dont have anything but hard to verify roleblock attempts, the only guy who could verify it is captain blackadder and he hasnt had more than 7 posts this game.Quote:
Could you try to help us out perhaps, all this time of lying to Renata and arguing with other probable townies and you can't reveal anything other than vague, unverifiable roleblock attempts?
Because one of you idiots who belive that they can get away with a faction victory that includes killing off my faction might get it into thier heads that I am a target.Quote:
Like, what is so hard about telling us what faction you're on and what it's enemies are, and wouldn't you rather do this of your own choice than someone else revealing your identity for you anyway?
No, it realy wouldn't, these guys have cover roles, revealing won't do squat and trying to get guys to cooperate after thier friends have turned out to be potential enemies(even more than they are now) is not going to help.Quote:
You're certainly not the only one who is being detrimental to the town here Greyblades, if you are Innocent, don't get me wrong, there's a lot of people and factions I'm waiting to hear the same on. But if people would just cooperate and reveal this we'd be much, much closer to finishing off the chaotics.
And revealing will just open the floodgates for the anti town to try and get two factions killing each other.Quote:
I don't care what you people are, South Park, Cosa Nostra, Psychotic, Springfield, so on, but it's killing the town to be secretly lying about each other's posts and accusing each other because of factional infighting.
Tell me if you werent so bloody invincible would you still do this?Quote:
The scanners like Bow-wow-wow who should reveal faction scans by now again need to do so as well. Because I'm happy to say that my agenda right now is to work with Backwards Logic and whomever else seems Innocent on simply lynching and vig-killing the various people who look scummy and if you're looking scummy because of silly factional stuff you're hiding it's your problem.
You know Visor, if you were a townie you would actually be constructive in helping others to realize that you were not a chaotic scum, rather than "oh I'm an innocent, read the thread which conveniently happens to have almost 2000 posts".
Quote the posts, or no deal. Explain in detail, your attempts to "be helpful" and post lists that put you forward as town do you absolutely no credit at all.
And also ignoring posts probing into your innocence or guilt that are hard to answer on your part won't do you any justice (in fact you still haven't answered my posts). I would hate to have to keep re-quoting and reposting them you know Visor, but I will.
That's because it will assist the scums in picking targets :bow:
Earthling is right in that regard.
Implying that you aren't scum because you aren't a scum role or based on past experiences is just really really contributing to the fact that you are trying to seem innocent but aren't providing hard facts.
Take for example, Romanic's defense:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
If you don't have something that details very precisely why you probably aren't scum Visor, your attempts to masquerade as town (lets not forget how you are being as slippery as an eel and trying to ignore the inconvenient fact that you were dished out as a suspect a few rounds ago) are entirely pointless because nobody will trust you wholeheartedly.
And telling people to "go read what I've said already" isn't helping anyone but the chaotics, if you are an evil character, you would assist, after all, what have you to lose if nobody but the town does not know your identity?
Regardless of Earthling being wrong, he is proven to be an evil aligned individual. Let the man who has never been wrong at mafia, heck even repeatedly, be the first to criticize him on that regard and "ignore anything he is saying". Any takers? :bow:Quote:
Earthlink "wallOtext" Detective has pretty much been wrong on every count of accusations he has made,
I said I have never been a scum role.Quote:
Implying that you aren't scum because you aren't a scum role or based on past experiences is just really really contributing to the fact that you are trying to seem innocent but aren't providing hard facts.
Quote:
And telling people to "go read what I've said already" isn't helping anyone but the chaotics, if you are an evil character, you would assist, after all, what have you to lose if nobody but the town does not know your identity?
I just did. If all goes to plan, you shall know my reasoning and what I have done. ;)
DiY, in a new post, post all the questions you want me to answer.
My number one question is just for you to post exactly what you have said in thread that makes you a town (evil) role.
Because from that post I've quoted, all you've been doing is claiming "oh I've already said that go and read up" which is very unproductive because townies would want figure out why they should believe you and the chaotics already know who you are.
My number two question (not specifically directed towards you but everyone) is questioning why nobody trusts Earthling.
Lets face the facts shall we?
1) Like Romanic he was attacked at night (Heck I even pointed this out when I was alive on the phase he was up for the lynch but nobody cared to listen to that fact)
2) He may be wrong, but I'd challenge the person who hasn't been wrong before in mafia to advocate ignoring him
3) There have been claims that he is a role asking to die, but these are all theories from what I recall and were only claimed not proven, more so based on what his role was in the game where it came from.
4) He's proven innocent, case closed (well unless people care to provide evidence that nullifies this :yes:)
I highly doubt it would be that easy to figure out the purpose of its role just by looking at what it was in a previous game.
You have to understand Visor, all of this is just smelling like a delaying scheme. All I'm (and others) are asking for is compelling evidence that suggests that you are townie, that is in fact highly plausible. I even cited Romanic's case as a good example, but you seem to be ignoring/not realizing the questions ALREADY BEING ASKED NUMEROUS TIMES OVER. Delaying such an example and waiting for something to come along to do it for you then using it as justification will not cut it for me.Quote:
I just did. If all goes to plan, you shall know my reasoning and what I have done. ;)
For example: You justified your votes on Renata and even said this precise phrase "I knew Renata had to die".
With the knowledge that she was not an evil/neutral character after her victory.
Don't make me have to quote it. Repeating myself needlessly is incredibly pointless and unless you derive great pleasure from intentionally frustrating members of your same team, you should help by providing the required information.
Heck even Renata provided pretty compelling evidence why she was not chaotic.
Revive me and I can give you answers!
Roleblocking, saving Renata by voting DE, my recent findings (which you will find out), my item comments. I dunno what else, what do you want me to say?Quote:
My number one question is just for you to post exactly what you have said in thread that makes you a town (evil) role.
Almost always wrong and he is quite insulting a lot of the time. Personally, I'm amused why no-one votes him anything. Buyt I suppose Renata's words on his character may ring true.Quote:
My number two question (not specifically directed towards you but everyone) is questioning why nobody trusts Earthling.
...Being wrong, rude and annoying arent signs of mafia, they're signs of a frustrated townie I should know I've been that way myself.
Well maybe not a frustrated townie per se but still.
Yeah, but he's catasrophically wrong and annoying. Going out of his way to be bad for the town. We don't even have any leads atm.
We have about 6 players with less than ten posts and this mysterious ressurector of renetas still to look up, we're not exactly wanting for suspects.
Edit: miscounted thats about 4 people without more than 10 posts we could be looking at.
Well why don't we pressure them in the morning?
You're saying we have two resurrectors?
One good and one bad, correct?
No, I think I remember reneta saying something about knowing a resurrector and I'm assuming its the same one that revived DE. Two might be a possibility but I'm not sure enough to say at this point.
Roleblocking does not prove that you aren't scum.
Saving Renata by voting DE could have been a bussing attempt.
I don't know and won't know until its public so that doesn't count. You should tell it to Backwards Logic, and see what he thinks. I honestly don't know why people aren't consolidating information with the confirmed innocents such as BL, if you don't trust/don't like Earthling, then send the information to Backwards Logic. There is no reason whatsoever to not give him that information if you think it vindicates you. He can and will decide.
Visorslash, I need you to quote precisely your "item comments" and everything about your role blocking. I do not want to have to flip through all of your posts, but I will if you persist in being so unhelpful and not elaborating.
I don't want you saying that "Oh I did Roleblocking". Who did you roleblock? Why does this make you innocent? Don't make me hound you for details Visor, this isn't very pleasant.
I have said what I already want you to say, stop feigning ignorance.
Romanic has publicly claimed to be said reviver Greyblades, he has provided compelling evidence as to why he is not scum :bow:Quote:
this mysterious ressurector of renetas still to look up
AKA being attacked by a chaotic.
Didn't Romanic claim the reviver?
DiY, Greyblades, please, your honest opinion. Am I scum?
Oh, well I definitely havent been paying attention. Did he say anything about DE?Quote:
Romanic has publicly claimed to be said reviver Greyblades, he has provided compelling evidence as to why he is not scum
AKA being attacked by a chaotic.
Visorslash, please answer my questions :bow:
That will determine my response to your question. And I also can't say whether you are scum are not, I can only say whether I think you are scum or not.
Well do you think I am scum?
I missed night one, and have only suceeding in roleblocking autolycus, who I said wasn't scum after people were talking about vigging him. Turns out he wasn't scum.
I made comments about losing my items after Renata won.
Thank you. DIY
So who revived DE?
Someone we don't know.
So is this why you are asking Greyblades and me for whether you are scum or not?
So you can quote us to lend credence to your supposed "innocence"??
Lets look at this shall we? Out of Auto's posts all 10 of them, there is no mention about Visorslash explicitly, and most certainly no mention about Visorslash being innocent.
Post #1243 here even expresses how he thinks his blocker might have been scum.
I'm sorry Visor, but Autolycus has not made any mention about you being innocent.
Your case is void, your innocence is not proved.
Elaborate, I am not moved and will continue persisting until your response is both satisfactory and existent (in relation to providing things that are not one liners).Quote:
I made comments about losing my items after Renata won.
A chaotic reviver, or simply someone who isn't chaotic neutral or evil, one can never know especially with Renata.Quote:
So who revived DE?
In any case, its most definitely not someone who is town.
Stop twisting things. I SAID that Autolycus wasn't scum after the possibility of him being vigged was brought up. I knew he wasn't a killer.
I will never convince you DiY. And I don't particularly care. Wait until the night is over and you shall see why I did what I did.
I will accept that error [looked at it wrongly] :bow:
Nevertheless elaboration would be nice :bow:
I remained unconvinced still because it is lacking.
Edit:Why do you not care? Like any other townie I am merely seeking to see whether you can be trusted or not, since you clearly desire to be, you should aid yourself in the process by cooperating with information.Quote:
And I don't particularly care
Or at the very least pass that information along to Backwards Logic, it will do you no good when dead and if you don't trust earthling, BL is still another confirmed townie.
Okay mate. Don't mind if I just ignore your dead body for the rest of purgatory then? :laugh4:
Oy vey, nice to see you two make up at least.