okie dokie
Unvote:Kage;Vote:Lord of Lent
Printable View
okie dokie
Unvote:Kage;Vote:Lord of Lent
Classical, vote for Lord of lent, otherwise you will still be in the lead.
Duel Beskar VS Reenk Roink
I do believe a blood debt is owed...
is it such a good idea to have duels every round? and have vigilante groups and all that ?
duel: Yaropolk versus Sasaki
I'd prefer not to lynch Nightbringer
Duels are awesome. For evidence see this.
In the interest of saving my skin and I am helpful for the town, I will unvote, vote:slashandburn
Why not?Quote:
Originally Posted by God Emperor
You scared they might kill you? That would sure leave your partner in a bind, eh?Quote:
and have vigilante groups and all that ?
Although I do remember a certain Mr. Sasaki costing the town a victory in Shadow Fort with his relentless vigilante blood-lust...
Vig groups are good. I'd be in one if I wasn't so absolutely useless now. :laugh4:
I encourage vigilantism.
unvote, vote: SubotanQuote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
Die traitor.
So do I, but we shouldn't go absolutely mental, Four Horsemen style.
EDIT: lolwut
NONSENSEQuote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
We lynch several mafia on account of having vigged the person we were going to lynch the night before...
Meh, there's only so much you can do once you're 10 feet under, getting lynched again and/or dueling someone would have been fun.
If my advice counts for something, I think you should lynch robbiecon.
He was the first to propose a duel between two other players, and without providing a good reason. DE and Chimpyang didn't even post before robbie offered that duel. Why? This is clearly someone with vile intentions.Quote:
Originally Posted by robbiecon
Because as far as I understand our goal is to survive for 15 rounds right? the mafias goal is to kill pevergreen iirc. Therefore we might harm ourselves a grand deal if we kill off important protectors (assuming there are such people) is this wrong? I don't think it's a necessity that we run around without thinking, slaughtering every person with a japanese nameQuote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
that's up for you to decide ^^ but no. Same logic applies to the duels as to the vigilante killsQuote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Well, chaotix was a bad vig. But in a game with only two mafia, it's a grand strategy.
People don't die in duels...Quote:
Originally Posted by GE
YESSSSSS :bounce:Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanic
You're awesome romanic.
In a vanilla game, where town has nothing and knows nothing, they wish and hope and pray for something, anything, even a double-edged sword like a vigilante.Quote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
Do mafia like vigilantism? No, because a lucky shot can cost them the entire game. Town can absorb a few mistakes, Mafia can't.
People who caution about vigilantism while practicing it in other games deserve to be hung from their dangly bits. THEY ARE MAFIA.
They cannot die ? in which case, duels sounds like a fine idea :)
Yes. Subotan, you went for vig groups early in past games. That was my first thought when I saw the vig actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
It looks to be a good way of deciding those who are strong and those who are weak. That is a good way of deciding those who are strong are generally either powerful townies or mafia.Quote:
Originally Posted by God Emperor
I'd be okay with a vigilante attack on robbiecon.
I've already organized such a group. Ready to fire if there's enough support.
Edit: I have a better idea. How about someone who is alive.
From the rules:
"Starts with two" and "Kill both starting mafia", suggests that it's possible for the mafia to grow, otherwise why use "start/ing" at all?Quote:
Originally Posted by Beefy187
I was just pointing out that the last time we thought we could absorb a few hits and placed ourselves under Sasaki's command everything went wrong. You should also bear in mind that the FH were freakishly lucky. That doesn't equal OMG no vigs EVAR. I didn't even know we had vigs until a few hours ago.
Vote: Lord of Lent - cleaning up from the previous day, since the clues today are not as good.
Well you look nervous. Is it the scars? Wanna know how I got em?Quote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
Or wait, everyone knows how I got em. *shaking fist in anger* SASAKI!!! https://img156.imageshack.us/img156/2056/emotargh.gif
I like the cautious behavior you're displaying. It's totally unlike you. Since when has Subotan played cautiously?
How do you mean cautious? Cautious about accusing others or just being less antagonising then usual?
EDIT: I think I get it, being more cautious about vigging?
How about cautious as in asking questions about what pizza means by cautious instead of an outright defense?Quote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
What am I meant to do Sasaki, provide the town with a full catalogue of evidence proving my innocence? You know just as well as I do that there's no evidence at this stage in the game, no way of mounting a defence that isn't just "C'mon guys! C'mmooooooonnnnn!". You can lynch me if you want, that's fine, as I'm perfectly happy to take a bullet (sword?) for the town. You can then see all the little scummies who will climb aboard the Subo-wagon to an easy lynch. I'd prefer though if a justification for lynching me actually existed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subotan
You should die because you're warning against vigilante killing, as if this was our first mafia game and weren't aware of the risks already.
I associate that with mafia behavior. Reminding townies how to play the game has been done before, often by mafia. Yourself included. This was a previous tell for you.
Because everybody here played Shadow Fort and everybody remembers exactly what happened the last time Sasaki called for vigs in that particular game, right.
Was it? I don't remember, maybe it was just me being a nice guy. See, I've played as mafia a lot in my past games, so you can take pretty much any aspect of my playing style and declare it a tell.