wow, was a bit too early there.
Still vote: Kommodus !
Printable View
wow, was a bit too early there.
Still vote: Kommodus !
Yeah, why not? His post at the start was the most suspicious thing so far.
Vote: Kommodus
GH do it.Now he is dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar
Damn the worst death yet (even worse than to die in a surreal popcorn explosion). I shall call this the blue balled strangulation case.
P.S. can somebody translate 'No inquira de iste neci'. I think that our killer is leaving clues, or at least some quotations about the deaths.
Er... you voted for Caius, buddy. :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
No, you haven't.Quote:
Originally Posted by doc_bean
I still have some tinkering to do before I cast my vote, but hey, you want me dead, go ahead then. I'm more than happy to sit back and watch the mafia take this one. As for my defense, well... I've already explained it several times - no need to add anything.
I know it's getting late and we need to make good lynches (Kommodus still being our biggest lead), but I also think it plausible that our Praetor has investigated him by now. I don't know what to do. :huh:
Praetor, if you even have a collection of 4-5 innocents (by next round), come out and reveal. Give your PM's (as quotes) so we can compare them with Csar's.
Vote:Kommodus
Well, strange things are happening. Maybe it really is a little bit too early to lynch Kommodus. Either way the next lynching should be Sasaki Kojiro, preferably today, but there's already many 'supporters' for Kommodus.
Why Sasaki?
Well his posting style has really differed from previous games. He hardly discusses the scarce evidence we have, but instead throws himself on different people. His pledge for Kommodus has been strong since the beginning but why his sudden change of vote to Caius? He switched votes several times during that turn.
Maybe he's just acting differently because he wants to try out a new strategy, but his constant attacks on Kommodus nag at me, mabye he fears that Kommodus' methods may point to him.
All in all he's acting highly suspicious and a dead Sasaki should not hurt the town too much, while removing one of the major suspects.
If I were alive I would vote Sasaki.
Can we spell bandwagon?Quote:
Yeah, why not? His post at the start was the most suspicious thing so far.
Vote: Kommodus
Vote: Craterus
Wow, I died because I sat on a needle. :no:
I would like to think that... eh, nevermind.
Oh, and don't vote for Kommodus.
1) If you want to compare, look at Csar's game not Mafia V.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ituralde
2) I changed to Caius because no one was going for Kommodus and because I thought the kills might have been written by him. I still think we should have lynched Kommodus last round.
With 11 alive we have 3 lynches left. Mafia have a good chance at pulling it off due to inactivity. If there are 3 WoG's we will only have 2 lynches.
Kommodus only felt confident enough in his system to post an accusation after 560 posts and 5 lynches in Mafia V. We've had 220 posts and 2 lynches. Furthermore, he has admitted that his system has trouble differentiating between mafia and detectives/doctors, and there is an equal chance of his system picking one of them. In spite of this he insists that he is vital to our towns chance of success and must not be lynched (because he'll refuse to help out if he is). This is suspicious.
I also found his "Ituralde I thought you were innocent :sadface:" "caius I thought you were innocent :sadface" comments suspicious, it's like he knew they were innocent is trying to gain favor with them.
Wow, that seemed fast. If we still have a Praetor, it might be time for him to speak up if he can clear some of the living as innocent and narrow our slate of suspects.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
As to Kommodus, I agree that we've had that albatross hanging around our necks for too long, he may well be mafia- regardless, it's making it difficult to look at other suspects with all the attention he's drawn to himself. Personally, I was hoping the mafia would kill and thereby exonerate him- but not such luck.
Vote Kommodus; I have some other suspects in mind too, but I'll withhold my suspicions until the next vote so as not to aid the mafia.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
BS Komm, we have 9 dead people already, I understand not wanting to get killed the first few rounds, but we're entering mid game now, I say everything goes, If you want to help the Senate then I applaud you, but if you're going to be upset over getting lynched halfway through the game you're just being whiney.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kommodus
On an unrelated note: can wa have a break on Xmass (24-26 december) ? I have a lot of family to visit and probably won't be able to participate, I recon a lot of people will have similar problems.
Or just being mafia. :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by doc_bean
Good point, I'll be completely unavailable all day tomorrow with limited availability on Sun,Mon,Tues- although I should be able to get on long enough to read up/log a vote on those days.Quote:
On an unrelated note: can wa have a break on Xmass (24-26 december) ? I have a lot of family to visit and probably won't be able to participate, I recon a lot of people will have similar problems.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Hey guys, Peasant Phil has a good point here. Last round, he asked about the Latin and he wound up dead, with another Latin phrase next to him. Does anybody speak Latin? I don't. But I'd really like to know 3 things:Quote:
Originally Posted by Peasant Phill
1) What do these phrases mean?
2) What does the phrase in Xiahou's signature mean?
3) Is he being bold, or is he being framed? I think it's the former. I think he saw Kommodus's crazy statement at the beginning and viola, he figured be too obvious, and we'll never look at him. I don't think Kommodus is his partner. I think his partner is already dead.
I'm not saying whom and I'm not saying why, but I 'think' we've got one of the mafia already. I'm testing a theory and when I'm proven right or wrong, I'll let you guys know. But I think if we lynch Xiahou this round, we win. If we don't lynch Xiahou this round, don't be surprised to see me showing up dead with a Latin phrase next to my corpse next round.
Edit to add: Not to mention, Xiahou didn't say hardly anything the first 2 rounds. Now he's wading in, going for lynches without a lot of evidence.
Vote: Xiahou
Can anyone say wild goose chase? :yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
There about like the bible quotes from Mafia V.
Funny that you say that. Somebody pointed the finger at Seamus, because of the bible quotes. As it turns out, he WAS one of the killers. And rather than blowing it off, why don't you explain all the Latin quotes. For all we know, Xiahou's signature means "You can't catch me, you fools".Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar
Negative.
"And therefore I believe that Carthage must be destroyed".Translation of "Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam".
^^^ https://img178.imageshack.us/img178/...motarghbr6.gif
"For the rest, I am of the opinion that Carthage is to be destroyed."Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Otherwise argue In Carthage to be delendam-From his postQuote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
To swim to ask about that neci' -From the last kill
Damn. Okay, that doesn't sound all that helpful. Do you guys really think Kommodus would be that obvious to call that much attention to himself at the beginning of the game like that? It just seems way, way too obvious. I don't know what to think... :dizzy2: I'm seriously asking. I just can't sell myself on him being that dumb. Then again, crazy like a fox, right?
Unvote: Xiahou (sorry about that)
Vote: Abstain
Ok, I've been doing some thinking, and while it is plausible to take the Praetor's silence as a sign that he investigated an innocent Kommodus, it is equally plausible that he is dead.
Vote: Kommodus
Also, Sasaki must die next round. I'm surprised he's lived this long.
Looks like it's the end for me. So sad; I had almost finished the updates I had planned to my latest tool. Oh well, I'll try 'em out some other time.
FYI, you are wasting a lynch here. I'm not the one you want. But I understand your suspicion - so just like in GF2, no hard feelings. Doc_bean: I don't actually care much about being lynched. It only seemed that way; I just wanted to try a new strategy to see if it would keep me alive any longer than in recent history.
Anyway, good luck to the town - you'll need it... :skull:
Ugh, we're making a huge mistake here guys... :wall:
Yeah, there's an experienced mafioso here. But it's not Kommodus. It's Sasaki.
He's been dogging Kommodus since Round 1, using pretty much the same accusation each time. Compare this to previous Mafia games where he has consistently piled on the evidence, suffocating the poor person buried underneath. Here it's just "that first post was weird, lynch him."
Secondly...
This is the first time in a while he's referenced a red herring, as if he was trying to detract attention from himself. I tried it in GF2. IIRC, he didn't even mention the Bible passages in Mafia V. Heck, he even went after Banquo's Ghost because he tried to explain the Wanax reference! Is this characteristic of an innocent Sasaki? No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Third, he's been going after experienced players all game. Kommodus is obviously his number one target, but went after me (and I don't buy that it was bait) to sort of test the waters. When I defend myself and spin the blame towards Caius he quickly feigns indecisiveness, and then later bandwagons. This is the exact strategy I used to get him lynched in Godfather 2.
Vote Sasaki, people.
GH is right everyone. Though I already told you that. Lynch Sasaki.
Yeah, pretty much exactly like Csar's game which was also low activity.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
I translated the quote that Xiahou's been posting to show Don that it wasn't "haha I did it". I haven't translated any of the kills quotes.Quote:
Secondly...
This is the first time in a while he's referenced a red herring, as if he was trying to detract attention from himself. I tried it in GF2. IIRC, he didn't even mention the Bible passages in Mafia V. Heck, he even went after Banquo's Ghost because he tried to explain the Wanax reference! Is this characteristic of an innocent Sasaki? No.
Kommodus is acting suspicious. If you want to claim that I'm going after him to lynch an experienced player, go ahead. But you have to then show that my accusations are contrived. You haven't done that, all you've said is "he's guilty". I have posted several arguments against Kommodus that you could have addressed specifically.Quote:
Third, he's been going after experienced players all game. Kommodus is obviously his number one target, but went after me (and I don't buy that it was bait) to sort of test the waters. When I defend myself and spin the blame towards Caius he quickly feigns indecisiveness, and then later bandwagons. This is the exact strategy I used to get him lynched in Godfather 2.
Vote Sasaki, people.
I can't let you live. ;)
You must be guilty :sweatdrop:Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar
Oh kill him please. Vote: Sasaki he's so obviously guilty. Him and Kommodus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I wouldn't just discard Xiahou just yet.
- The quotation has a second meaning, namely that important things should be constantly repeated. What are you hinting at?
- Xiahou only started to use this quotation right after the rebels started to use quotations. Again why?
- Most of us respond the first chance we get when we're being accused. You however ignored my questions and accusations twice. For the third time why? Are you trying to let your little hint slip by unnoticed?