Me, johnhugthom and Tratorix were supposed to protect somebody last night, but Traorix is dead now. I do not know anyone else in the group apart from the ones that I've already mentioned.
Printable View
Treachery abounds! God save us all!!! :dizzy2::help::inquisitive:
I haven't received a night action result either, why are you suspicious of Quintus, Tratorix?
I believe the highlighted part of the sentance would do it :P
I believe that all the facts QJC brought up are true, but he also posted a defense for himself and the rest of the townie group out of the blue without anyone accusing him. The rest of the group (who are likely innocent) jumped in right away to defend QJC's statement since it clears them as well. In reality QJC has no way of knowing if any of his group partners are mafia or not. Therefore he must be defending himself.
Vote: Quintus.JC
Why not.
Vote: Quintus
Vote:Abstain I'm not entirely convinced of QJC's guiltiness, but he will be lynched regardless.
I will not dirty my hands
An unasked-for excuse sounds a little scummy. Vote: Quintus JC
No, I'd rather not sentance a man to death whom I doubt is guilty, stop shifting suspicion.
On the other hand, if my BANDWAGGONING of a target would appease you.
Unvote; Abstain
Vote: QJC
uhh I am gone for 4 hours and all of this gets started, give me a few minutes and I will cats my ballot.....
Not again... this has been a bad point in some games, useless.Quote:
There are also a few errors in the writing.
Vote:Abstain, but Quintius has not commented anything of the accussation, same thing with navarro.
Any chance of some result pms Ignoramus, then we may be able to shed light on Quintus.
I got my night result and there is good and bad news.
I investigated ATPG and he is a confirmed Gaul.
The bad news is he was killed shortly thereafter.
But night results have been sent out. As people have asked.
Vote QJC as it seems a good vote at this stage.
unvote; vote:spL1tp3r50naL1ty
For being suspicious.
seems like a big bandwagon on this round as well...
vote:abstain for now
Vote:Abstain
Vote:Abstain for now... dont want to hop on the bandwagon...have no suspects either...would like to see a response from Quintus.
I investigated ATPG and he is a confirmed Gaul.
The bad news is he was killed shortly thereafter.
But night results have been sent out. As people have asked.
Hmm, me and Atheotes invesigated Beefy but have recieved no results (or i haven't anyway) im assuming it was because he was killed that night ?
But, if your investigation worked on the night ATPG was killed would this mean that mine and Atheotes investigation was unsucessful becuase of failed orders ?
I would think this unlikely because Atheotes contacted me to do the investigation and sent his pm about the investigation to me and Ignoramus...
The second part could be a trick but the first part would seem like a pointless risk... though it could be ballsy play...
Don't paticularly like the bandwagon on QJC, and the mini one on Split for avoiding the bandwagon doesn't seem any better...
Im tempted to vote for ED or Atheotes... need to think on it some more though...
I think that the bolded section above bears some thought. It suggests an ulterior faction present within our midst, and I would suspect that the dead person who was part of them was Beefy.Quote:
Two of bodies looked Gaulish, while another displayed Roman features. The other body, however, was unknown to the delegates.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I fail to see why there is a sudden bandwagon on Quintus, this is looking to me like de ja vu from Navarro lynch where he didn't even get to plead his case...
Vote:Abstain
Tally
Quintus: V (Yaropolk, Chaotix, Iskandar, Split, El Diablo)
Split: II (Count Arach, Beskar)
CDF: I (Cronos Impera)
Abstain: IV (Caius, Taka, Johnhughthom, DIY)
I for one think beefy was a simple roman, but I am not sure.
Refering to your party in the third person would not be unusual *shrug*
Vote: Sasaki
For being suspi--- oh wait.....
Unvote, Vote: QJC
And I FoS: All who defend QJC as well. Everyone knows that townies need to go out of their way to make themselves seem innocent...
Mine was slightly different as I have the ability to investigate one player on my own, once.Quote:
Hmm, me and Atheotes invesigated Beefy but have recieved no results (or i haven't anyway) im assuming it was because he was killed that night ?
But, if your investigation worked on the night ATPG was killed would this mean that mine and Atheotes investigation was unsucessful becuase of failed orders ?
I would think this unlikely because Atheotes contacted me to do the investigation and sent his pm about the investigation to me and Ignoramus...
The second part could be a trick but the first part would seem like a pointless risk... though it could be ballsy play...
Don't paticularly like the bandwagon on QJC, and the mini one on Split for avoiding the bandwagon doesn't seem any better...
Im tempted to vote for ED or Atheotes... need to think on it some more though...
I would not get their role just their faction and if they were active that night.
I am often an early target and ATPG had asked to be investigated - so I did. But he ended up dead.
I don't think that my behavior warrents a vote as I am trying to state that my night investigation yielded a result whereas the ones that did not yield an answer may not have worked due to them being infiltrated by scum or romans?
look at your groups people.
Hmm. Kinda wish my townie group had investigated Quintus last night. Ah well. First round he was quite nuetral, and now this. Scummy. Usually more much more deceptive than this!
Anyway, my vote is for White eyes:D. How's it going! ~:wave:
Vote: White eyes:D
Investigations don't tell whether or not players are guilty, anyway, they only tell the faction. The more we know of other players' factions, the more risk we have of members of the town trying to side with the mafia.