Asterix and the Gauls [Concluded]

[Quintus.JC]

Quintus was contacted to both kill and protect?

Me, johnhugthom and Tratorix were supposed to protect somebody last night, but Traorix is dead now. I do not know anyone else in the group apart from the ones that I've already mentioned.

[atheotes]

Me, johnhugthom and Tratorix were supposed to protect somebody last night, but Traorix is dead now. I do not know anyone else in the group apart from the ones that I've already mentioned.

Did you get a night result from Ignoramus?

[King Jan III Sobieski]

Treachery abounds! God save us all!!!

[Quintus.JC]

Did you get a night result from Ignoramus?

Not presently, I am requesting it though. I think Ignoramus probably didn't have the time, he is using invisible mode so you can't tell when he's online. Had anyone else got their Night results?

[Tratorix]

Tratorix contacted me as well about forming a kill/protection group, those on the list were Iskander 3.1, johnhughthom, Jolt, spL1tp3r50naL1ty and me. I think finding the killer on that list is unlikely since it would be too obvious, it seems that revealing his intentions in public was the reason why Tratorix was killed.

Lynch Quintus. That is my final wish.

[johnhughthom]

I haven't received a night action result either, why are you suspicious of Quintus, Tratorix?

[Splitpersonality]

I believe the highlighted part of the sentance would do it :P

[Yaropolk]

I believe that all the facts QJC brought up are true, but he also posted a defense for himself and the rest of the townie group out of the blue without anyone accusing him. The rest of the group (who are likely innocent) jumped in right away to defend QJC's statement since it clears them as well. In reality QJC has no way of knowing if any of his group partners are mafia or not. Therefore he must be defending himself.

Vote: Quintus.JC

[Chaotix]

Why not.

Vote: Quintus

[CountArach]

I believe that all the facts QJC brought up are true, but he also posted a defense for himself and the rest of the townie group out of the blue without anyone accusing him. The rest of the group (who are likely innocent) jumped in right away to defend QJC's statement since it clears them as well. In reality QJC has no way of knowing if any of his group partners are mafia or not. Therefore he must be defending himself.

Vote: Quintus.JC

Sounds convincing enough to me I suppose.

Vote: Quintus

I still have to go through Jolt's posts... Procrastination is a hash mistress.

[Splitpersonality]

Vote:Abstain I'm not entirely convinced of QJC's guiltiness, but he will be lynched regardless.

I will not dirty my hands

[CountArach]

Vote:Abstain I'm not entirely convinced of QJC's guiltiness, but he will be lynched regardless.

I will not dirty my hands

Unvote, Vote: Splitpersonality

Not wanting to dirty your hands shows an unwillingness to set yourself up as a target later on. That is a sign of scumminess.

[Iskander 3.1]

An unasked-for excuse sounds a little scummy. Vote: Quintus JC

[Splitpersonality]

No, I'd rather not sentance a man to death whom I doubt is guilty, stop shifting suspicion.

On the other hand, if my BANDWAGGONING of a target would appease you.

Unvote; Abstain
Vote: QJC

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

uhh I am gone for 4 hours and all of this gets started, give me a few minutes and I will cats my ballot.....

[Caius]

There are also a few errors in the writing.

Not again... this has been a bad point in some games, useless.

Vote:Abstain, but Quintius has not commented anything of the accussation, same thing with navarro.

[johnhughthom]

Any chance of some result pms Ignoramus, then we may be able to shed light on Quintus.

[El Diablo]

I got my night result and there is good and bad news.

I investigated ATPG and he is a confirmed Gaul.

The bad news is he was killed shortly thereafter.

But night results have been sent out. As people have asked.

Vote QJC as it seems a good vote at this stage.

[Beskar]

unvote; vote:spL1tp3r50naL1ty

For being suspicious.

[taka]

seems like a big bandwagon on this round as well...

vote:abstain for now

[johnhughthom]

Vote:Abstain

[atheotes]

Vote:Abstain for now... dont want to hop on the bandwagon...have no suspects either...would like to see a response from Quintus.

[LittleGrizzly]

I investigated ATPG and he is a confirmed Gaul.

The bad news is he was killed shortly thereafter.

But night results have been sent out. As people have asked.

Hmm, me and Atheotes invesigated Beefy but have recieved no results (or i haven't anyway) im assuming it was because he was killed that night ?

But, if your investigation worked on the night ATPG was killed would this mean that mine and Atheotes investigation was unsucessful becuase of failed orders ?

I would think this unlikely because Atheotes contacted me to do the investigation and sent his pm about the investigation to me and Ignoramus...

The second part could be a trick but the first part would seem like a pointless risk... though it could be ballsy play...

Don't paticularly like the bandwagon on QJC, and the mini one on Split for avoiding the bandwagon doesn't seem any better...

Im tempted to vote for ED or Atheotes... need to think on it some more though...

[Death is yonder]

Two of bodies looked Gaulish, while another displayed Roman features. The other body, however, was unknown to the delegates.

I think that the bolded section above bears some thought. It suggests an ulterior faction present within our midst, and I would suspect that the dead person who was part of them was Beefy.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Beefy187 was gazing interestedly at the huts while walking down the street. So these were the indomitable Gauls that the Romans had feared.

The conference so far had been all rather exciting. Far more amusing that anything else at this time of year. The only negative had been the cold weather, but then again, what could one expect of Gaul?

So caught up in these thoughts, Beefy187 didn’t notice the shadows moving in the distance.

The next moment a loud crack was heard, and Beefy187 sunk to ground - dead.

The first bolded section suggests that Beefy was neither the Gauls, nor the Romans, but rather a foreigner. Also, the 2nd paragraph speaks as if the person is not a native to the place, unused to the weather as well as finding the "same old things" which would have been typical to the Gauls/Romans as "exciting".

Next, the following sentence shows that Beefy is clearly not a native Gaul, or even a Roman. "What could one expect of Gaul?" is clearly referring to "Gaul" as a country, not "Gauls". As such, I can conclude that there is a SK faction or something/people from other countries in our midst.

I fail to see why there is a sudden bandwagon on Quintus, this is looking to me like de ja vu from Navarro lynch where he didn't even get to plead his case...

Vote:Abstain

Tally

Quintus: V (Yaropolk, Chaotix, Iskandar, Split, El Diablo)
Split: II (Count Arach, Beskar)
CDF: I (Cronos Impera)

Abstain: IV (Caius, Taka, Johnhughthom, DIY)

[Splitpersonality]

I for one think beefy was a simple roman, but I am not sure.

Refering to your party in the third person would not be unusual *shrug*

[A Very Super Market]

Vote: Sasaki

For being suspi--- oh wait.....

Unvote, Vote: QJC

And I FoS: All who defend QJC as well. Everyone knows that townies need to go out of their way to make themselves seem innocent...

[atheotes]

I investigated ATPG and he is a confirmed Gaul.

The bad news is he was killed shortly thereafter.

But night results have been sent out. As people have asked.

Hmm, me and Atheotes invesigated Beefy but have recieved no results (or i haven't anyway) im assuming it was because he was killed that night ?

But, if your investigation worked on the night ATPG was killed would this mean that mine and Atheotes investigation was unsucessful becuase of failed orders ?

I would think this unlikely because Atheotes contacted me to do the investigation and sent his pm about the investigation to me and Ignoramus...

The second part could be a trick but the first part would seem like a pointless risk... though it could be ballsy play...

Don't paticularly like the bandwagon on QJC, and the mini one on Split for avoiding the bandwagon doesn't seem any better...

Im tempted to vote for ED or Atheotes... need to think on it some more though...

i have already asked the question about the missing night results and infact i initiated it. i sent a PM to Ignoramus as well. i did not want to reveal what we were trying to do till i got the results as i was suspicious of you.

[El Diablo]

Hmm, me and Atheotes invesigated Beefy but have recieved no results (or i haven't anyway) im assuming it was because he was killed that night ?

But, if your investigation worked on the night ATPG was killed would this mean that mine and Atheotes investigation was unsucessful becuase of failed orders ?

I would think this unlikely because Atheotes contacted me to do the investigation and sent his pm about the investigation to me and Ignoramus...

The second part could be a trick but the first part would seem like a pointless risk... though it could be ballsy play...

Don't paticularly like the bandwagon on QJC, and the mini one on Split for avoiding the bandwagon doesn't seem any better...

Im tempted to vote for ED or Atheotes... need to think on it some more though...

Mine was slightly different as I have the ability to investigate one player on my own, once.
I would not get their role just their faction and if they were active that night.

I am often an early target and ATPG had asked to be investigated - so I did. But he ended up dead.
I don't think that my behavior warrents a vote as I am trying to state that my night investigation yielded a result whereas the ones that did not yield an answer may not have worked due to them being infiltrated by scum or romans?

look at your groups people.

[naut]

Hmm. Kinda wish my townie group had investigated Quintus last night. Ah well. First round he was quite nuetral, and now this. Scummy. Usually more much more deceptive than this!

Anyway, my vote is for White eyes:D. How's it going!

Vote: White eyes:D

[Chaotix]

Investigations don't tell whether or not players are guilty, anyway, they only tell the faction. The more we know of other players' factions, the more risk we have of members of the town trying to side with the mafia.