I'm going to vote for Sasaki. His posts are very suspicious. He has been going after Kommodus for the whole game now, but with a sudden vote changing last round from Kommodus to GH and from GH to Caius. There's something fishy in his posting/voting methods this game.
Vote: Sasaki
Btw Peasant Phill, Xiahou started using that quote before the kills and it's likely that the latin quotes are a red herring. Its a rather historical quote.
12-23-2006, 13:18
Sir Moody
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Voting Closed
12-23-2006, 13:43
Sir Moody
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
"Friends, Romans, Countrymen we have chosen today to kill one of our oldest and most revered members, Senator Indubitanter Peto known as Kommodus. As a punishment to such a veteran the senate we hereby decree he should be crucified at the steps of the senate as a reminder to the plebs that justice will be done. Retire now my friends and let us watch the punishment - justice has been done."
As they filed out there was a rumble and the floor began to shake. A rift suddenly appeared in the floor swallowing up Senator desidiosus known as the Destroyer of Hope. The rumbling ceased and the rift resealed itself. A voice boomed out "Foolish Mortals do not tempt the gods through inaction we will smite those who do not contribute!"
I have decided the next night phase will be extra long - this night phase will end Noon GMT on Wednesday - everyone enjoy your holidays and hopefully we can come back and finish this game afterwards
12-23-2006, 17:07
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Interesting. 9 left. Since csar can't vote and can't be killed, if there is one more wrath of god then we only have one lynch left. But I think everyone from the list has been active enough. Praetor should definitely claim next round though.
12-23-2006, 17:29
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Ok Kommodus. Did you come up with any results at all from your system? I'm curious.
12-23-2006, 21:36
Reenk Roink
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Ugh, we're making a huge mistake here guys... :wall:
Yeah, there's an experienced mafioso here. But it's not Kommodus. It's Sasaki.
He's been dogging Kommodus since Round 1, using pretty much the same accusation each time. Compare this to previous Mafia games where he has consistently piled on the evidence, suffocating the poor person buried underneath. Here it's just "that first post was weird, lynch him."
Secondly...
This is the first time in a while he's referenced a red herring, as if he was trying to detract attention from himself. I tried it in GF2. IIRC, he didn't even mention the Bible passages in Mafia V. Heck, he even went after Banquo's Ghost because he tried to explain the Wanax reference! Is this characteristic of an innocent Sasaki? No.
Third, he's been going after experienced players all game. Kommodus is obviously his number one target, but went after me (and I don't buy that it was bait) to sort of test the waters. When I defend myself and spin the blame towards Caius he quickly feigns indecisiveness, and then later bandwagons. This is the exact strategy I used to get him lynched in Godfather 2.
Vote Sasaki, people.
Oh don't worry, Sasaki has been on my target list since round 3. He'll die by our lynching next round. I've made it clear that Sasaki must die.
I'm finishing up my speech against him, it'll come after Christmas. :yes:
12-24-2006, 12:54
doc_bean
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
I never notice JimBob around, does he always post this little ?
I'm all for voting for Sasaki next round, he's been acting 'funny', or 'funnier' than usual anyway :inquisitive:
12-24-2006, 16:26
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc_bean
I never notice JimBob around, does he always post this little ?
I'm all for voting for Sasaki next round, he's been acting 'funny', or 'funnier' than usual anyway :inquisitive:
You think I've been acting funny and yet you voted for caius and kommodus without giving a reason?
12-24-2006, 19:05
JimBob
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
I never notice JimBob around, does he always post this little ?
Its a little less than in Csar's game. In my own defense I'm still getting my feet wet in mafia. And this is the third day of winter break for me. I have not really spent much time at home or lucid. Come the next round I'll be getting back up to speed.
12-24-2006, 21:41
Kommodus
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Ok Kommodus. Did you come up with any results at all from your system? I'm curious.
:laugh4:
EDIT: Merry Christmas everyone!
12-24-2006, 21:59
AggonyDuck
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kommodus
:laugh4:
EDIT: Merry Christmas everyone!
There's no date for the edit.
:inquisitive:
12-24-2006, 22:24
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AggonyDuck
There's no date for the edit.
:inquisitive:
It happens sometimes if you edit real fast.
@Kommodus: As I suspected, you didn't bother trying to find mafia because you were mafia.
12-25-2006, 01:44
Xiahou
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AggonyDuck
Btw Peasant Phill, Xiahou started using that quote before the kills and it's likely that the latin quotes are a red herring. Its a rather historical quote.
Actually, it was Reenk that inspired me to add the latin phrase to add my own bit of flavor to the Senate setting.
IIRC, it was often spoken by Cato during the lead up to the 3rd Punic War. He was concerned by Carthage's growing prosperity and was convinced Rome should finish them off. He made a habit of adding that statement at the end of all his speeches to drive the point home. :beam:
As to my next suspect, I'm not convinced of the wisdom in naming names before the rebels strike again... If we start to cast suspicion on an innocent Senator to the point they look likely to be executed the rebels need not consider them as a kill since we're likely to lynch the Senator for them. :shrug:
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
12-25-2006, 21:47
doc_bean
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
You think I've been acting funny and yet you voted for caius and kommodus without giving a reason?
Hey, you said it yourself, you're always going to be suspicious :laugh4:
I voted for Kommodus because I was tired of the endless debates of his 'morals' in this game, he took away the focus from finding the rebels, though he might have also been a rebel himself. Either way, I saw lynching Kommodus as a win-win situation (obviously one kind of win is a lot better than the other).
12-26-2006, 19:03
Sir Moody
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
the night phase will end at noon tommorow - I hope everyone has had a great holiday and is fresh and ready to finish this game
12-27-2006, 21:50
Sir Moody
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
well i had a 6 hour powercut from 11 till 5 and then i havent been able to get onto the org so todays kills are pushed back to tommorow - sorry all it was an act of a greater power than me... the north hertfordshire power board
12-28-2006, 14:00
Sir Moody
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Senator Novus Caro, known to his friends and enemies alike as jimbob, was the most learned man in all of Rome. His library was the largest collection of historical accounts known to the world, with the exception of the library at alexandria. He was convinced he could find the Rebels Identities by pouring through old scrolls, in a way he was right. He was reading a very interesting account of a battle against the gauls when a fellow senator sat down in front of him. Novus was a little confused he was sure he had ordered his slaves to turn everyone away. The Senator Spoke, "Good evening my friend Novus i come with an offer. Your Learned nature would be very useful to us when we rule all you have to do is agree to serve me and renounce the senate." "NO" screamed as he Realised who was sitting in front of him "you are a rebel and a murderer i will never serve you!". He drew his dagger and lunged at the Traitor but he had not looked behind him. As he lept up from the table a large Gaulish Slave slipped a leather cord around his neck and within seconds had squeezed all the life out of poor Novus. "Oh well it was worth a shot, you know what to do", the slave nodded and the traitorous senator left. in the Morning the words "Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc" were found written in Novus's blood across the walls...
Senator Craterus was scared out of his mind. He knew the Senate was doomed and was sure he was next. So sure in fact he had decided to flee with his mistress to his villa out of rome. in the Middle of the night they crept out to his litter and started to head out of Rome - they didnt make it far. Craterus Rolled over and felt something sharp bite into his skin. The Mistresses screams awoke the guards who found Craterus Shaking uncontrollable with white froth forming at his mouth. He was dead in minutes...
"well my friends" Csar announced "this is it our numbers our so small now - we have only 2 chances left and so this vote will be the most important yet. Let us not waste this for then all will be lost"
Don't vote Sasaki, Reenk or me, stand by for further information (gotta go...)
12-28-2006, 14:53
Peasant Phill
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
tumtumtum
this is a very strange game
12-28-2006, 16:35
doc_bean
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
Congratulations you have been Randonly Selected to be the Praetor in Interficio quod Scrupulosa. Each night you will PM me with your target and I will respond with Guilty or innocent.
Remmber you cannot Reveal to individuals or after your death it must happen while you are alive and to everyone at once.
Good Luck
Dutch_Guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
innocent
Reenk Roink
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
despite his behavior - Innocent
Sasaki
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
like he says - OMG hes innocent
Craterus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
Well i needn't say it since he was killed but - Innocent
Farewell friends, countrymen, Romans, I know my end is near, I hope what little information I have gathered will help you root out the rebels. I will probably be killed tonight, but before that, I will make sure another suspect is lynched !
12-28-2006, 16:51
Don Corleone
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Damn, damn, damn. This sucks. If we lynch today, and we guess wrong, we're all but doomed. If we don't lynch today, we're certainly doomed. :no:
Doc_Bean's reveal is about the only thing we have going for us. If he's telling the truth, then the suspects are:
Don Corleone
Xiahou
Aggony_Duck
If not, then Reenk, Doc_Bean and Sasaki are also still suspects. I think we must have gotten one of them by now. The game should end when we nail the next one.
Reenk, you said you had a long laundry list of evidence against Sasaki that was irrefutable. Could you please share it now? If you're right, then there are 2 rebels left... Doc_Bean would have to be in on it, unless there's a twist..
Sasaki, you're always one of the best end-game players. What do you think?
Come on folks!!! We've only got one or two shots left!!! :wall:
12-28-2006, 16:54
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
I'm pretty sure it's AggonyDuck.
12-28-2006, 17:50
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Duck has avoided taking a strong position on anything this game.
On Kommodus:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Quote:
I don't think we should lynch Kommodus. I don't think a mafioso would dare to warrant such attention to himself at the start. Unless of course Kommodus possesses considerable testicular fortitude. So I'd suggest we keep him alive for now, but we should remain suspicious of him as we should remain of pretty much anyone.
Quote:
One thing though; the voting based on suspicious behaviour might not be the best option. I believe it is far more common for the rebels to continue acting as they have done previously, than to drastically change their behavior
Quote:
I'm not so convinced over Kommodus guilt. I believe if he was a rebel then he would propably not have posted it. It pretty much effectively dooms him in the end, because it will bring upon him suspicion and unless a Praetor cleans his name he ends up being a big suspect until the end. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but usually the last thing a rebel/mafioso wants is attention in the first rounds, especially attention like this that really doesn't serve to further his cause.
But on the other hand if Kommodus was the Praetor things would suddenly make sense. He would be afraid of being targeted by the mafia early on and thus to buy time make himself a highly suspicious post asking the rebels not to kill him. It would make sense to a degree.
Quote:
It's a bit early to make any decisions based on gut yet. I first need to develop a feel for the game and everyone's behaviour. My logic is saying no about you being mafia, but my gut is yet undecided. Might need atleast three or four rounds to get a proper feel.
EDIT: Even then I don't think my gut is as reliable as I sometimes tend to believe that it is.
That's a lot of words, they all try to make Kommodus seem innocent but they never say he is. Duck is just "not so convinced", "correct me if I'm wrong" etc. If you read that passage while disagreeing with him it won't jump out at you like stronger statements would. It's a technique for avoiding attention.
He also avoids saying he's suspicious of anyone. He wants everyone to think he thinks they are innocent. His first vote was for Craterus:
Quote:
I do not think that it is in our advantage to abstain now. Thus I will cast my vote on someone and I've decided to cast my vote on Craterus. He has an uncanny ability to survive far in to the game, without really much posting anything and remaining as a great unknown throughout the whole game.
Vote: Craterus
Note the lengthy qualifier "I don't think you're guilty but you have stay alive a long time". He follows this up in a later post with further qualification:
Quote:
Craterus, I don't have anything against you except the fact that you have a tendency to stay under the radar and survive to the endgame. I've already played a couple of games where you have been a "unknown" at the end game and I'd rather not have such a situation again.
Quote:
EDIT: Forgot my vote. My vote goes for Reenk Roink. Of the two he is the one being a bit more suspicious, although what value that has remains to be seen.
Vote: Reenk Roink
His vote for Reenk Roink is in the same vein.
He abstains against Caius:
Quote:
Kinda busy at the moment and I don't feel like joining the Caius bandwagon, so:
Vote: Abstain
Quote:
I'm going to vote for Sasaki. His posts are very suspicious. He has been going after Kommodus for the whole game now, but with a sudden vote changing last round from Kommodus to GH and from GH to Caius. There's something fishy in his posting/voting methods this game.
Vote: Sasaki
He makes a strong vote against me but we'll get back to this one, as this is when I started pm'ing him.
We have this set of statements:
Quote:
Anyway currently the game seems like a lottery as does the start of every mafia game. We'll just have to proceed on and eventually we should start to get a proper feel of the game and the different senators.
...
Sadly the game at this phase is very much like a lottery. You choose someone at random and hope that they are rebels.
...
At the moment this game resembles a lottery at best and well to be blunt, it really comes down to luck at the moment to lynch the rebels, so I suppose I am as good as any other suspect.
If the game is a lottery, then you don't have to have a strong position against anyone. Of course, the game is actually nothing like a lottery, but it's convenient for him to say so.
Now, his vote against me made me curious so I started pm'ing him.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
What makes you think I'm guilty?
Sasaki
Quote:
Originally Posted by AggonyDuck
The main reason why you got my vote was because I didn't think that Kommodus was guilty. I wasn't really sure on whom I should cast my vote on, so I decided to vote for you, because well you seemed to be a suitable non-Kommodus to vote for in a hurry.
As I noticed at once, this is nothing like his posted reasons in the thread. Turns out he voted for me because he was "in a hurry" and I seemed "suitable". A marked change from "sasaki is very suspicious".
I pointed this out and he says:
Quote:
Exactly. What I gave there was really more of an excuse and I believe it shows too. I voted for you due to your constant hounding of Kommodus, whom I believe is innocent. You were after him since his first post and kept up with it until his death and in the process managing to avoid suspicion quite nicely. The prospect of you being alive in the endgame is never a good one for the villagers. This is because unless a detective clears your name, you will always remain a highly suspicious player who can dominate a game. So I'd rather avoid that situation.
This is in contradiction of his last pm. So: First he says I'm very suspicious, then he says he voted me because I was a "suitable non-Kommodus" and now it's because I'm me and it's too risky to have me alive in the endgame.
Quote:
Because I didn't have the time to think things through. I was checking the mafia thread quickly during a visit to my father to get my vote in to avoid the WoG. I read the posts and I didn't feel like joining the Kommodus bandwagon. Also I agreed with the statements of GH and basically I copied his arguments to make things easier for myself.
Oh look, now his post was just a quote of GH.
Quote:
Well I still agree that they do make you a bit suspicious, especially the sudden vote changes before the Caius execution, but at the same time I don't know if you would be asking me all these questions if you were a mafioso. So maybe you might just be innocent.
Haha, so now he thinks I'm innocent. He's just trying to throw me off his track.
Essentially it comes down to this: Mafia know who is guilty, so any argument they make against someone is contrived. AggonyDuck's arguments are contrived as can be seen by his waffling about trying to find a convincing one. Mafia also try to avoid attention. The biggest way to get attention is to accuse someone, people respond to accusation. He has tried to avoid this the entire game by abstaining or qualifying his votes.
Lynch him.
12-28-2006, 17:51
Caius
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Craterus is a woman ;)
12-28-2006, 17:59
GeneralHankerchief
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
doc_bean has nothing to really gain personally by revealing at this stage so I believe him.
AggonyDuck does sound like a good lynch this round. Out of the three remaining innocents I believe that he and Xiahou are our mafiosi, unless of course we already nailed one via the executions (highly unlikely).
12-28-2006, 18:29
Marshal Murat
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Talk about a catch 22
Said the Plebian...
12-28-2006, 18:51
AggonyDuck
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Well to be quite honest I actually tend to talk like that quite a lot at times. Words like might, propably, believe, maybe etc. are propably among my most used words, atleast usually, but I suppose that in this context they could appear strange to some people. As long as I lack some degree of conviction I will most likely sound a bit unconvincing. It usually is one of my bigger problems. Anyway it is a possibility that you might be making a mistake by voting for me or you could possibly be saving the senate. Maybe it might just be so that I am innocent. Or perhaps I am just guilty and being vague just allows me to refrain from lying, which I might have avoided quite nicely. Either way I'm somewhat relieved by your accusations, because it might mean that this rather dreadful existance might come to an end. Hopefully you might understand that there is a definate possibility that I might be guilty to some degree and that I propably can't be arsed to fight for the meager possibility of a continuation in this game. By the way I still believe that the starting rounds are very much like a lottery when it comes to voting, because it is down to luck if you manage to lynch a mafioso in the early rounds. But at the same time it does serve the purpose of laying the groundwork for the game, but still the votes cast by the villagers are mere lottery in the end. What might be somewhat more important is how the votes might incriminate you in the end. Anyway as I might have been saying at some earlier point, there is a good risk that I might be somewhat guilty of the murders of certain senators against whom I propably held no sort of possible grudge and that the murders which might and could have been commited by me and my late accomplice might have been just due to some sort of semi-divine intervention and the voice of some higher power that possibly told me to kill senators, which I most likely did not enjoy, although there is no saying that some of the murders might have been somewhat enjoyable, especially the murder of GH, which might have been commited by me after his rather disturbing gut-vote. Well atleast I got some sort of revenge there, but at the same time I might have believed that there was a likely chance that I was doing badly and that I most likely would be executed at some point due to my possible mistakes, provided that I am a rebel of course. Anyway good riddance somewhat cruel world and hopefully this will all be over by the end of this vote. Damn...
12-28-2006, 18:58
AggonyDuck
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
Oh and I'd like to vote: Sasaki! I think his "evidence" is ridiculous and hearsay at best. Where are the murder weapons, finger prints and eye witness accounts? Until he presents them I will believe that he is guilty!:inquisitive:
12-28-2006, 19:24
Don Corleone
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
I don't know. Sasaki makes some very good points, and even in his rebuttal, all Aggony says is "well, I talk that way sometimes". Contradicting yourself directly from one PM to the next, and from what you've posted publicly to what you say privately is very suspicious behavior. I still think Xiahou has a hand in all of this with the Latin phrases, but unless Peasant Phil or somebody else that understands Latin can offer more evidence, I have to vote for the guy that can't seem to speak straight...
Vote: AggonyDuck
P.S. Is there any chance that DocBean is lying? I'm just curious who the other mafia could be. Right now, Xiahou is my best bet, but frankly, the evidence against him isn't very good...
12-28-2006, 19:28
Sasaki Kojiro
Re: Interficio quod Scrupulosa (Game Started)
haha, forgot I'm still alive. Vote:AggonyDuck
He's confessed now anyway. I'm convinced Kommodus was the other mafioso and the game will be over once we lynch ducky.