Printable View
That's it? At that point LW wasn't even lynched and you went after Moros... :wall: He had an alibi for every SINGLE night. Really poor planning... :mean:
As for your dismissal of getting lynched, I agree it is unlikely now. But you have around 3 people who vote with you no matter what (Double A, split, Kukri). Then you have 3ish more who are pretty much with you.
Laugh it up chuckles for now, but it's going to happen soon enough. :yes: :beam:
Perhaps rogue dons no longer come up as innocent, seeing as how they're probably running around killing people?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Right, so if all the remaining innocents are dead or cleared, then there is only one don remaining--i.e. we win if we lynch him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tratorix
Made's become dons, wiseguys become mades... Then there is the SK which may continue on after the Mafia are eliminated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I thought the rogue Don would technically fall under "mafia"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Boy, you really sound like an innocent townie. It's a good thing you didn't die.
And why is this ?
Because innocent townies don't kill or arrange the deaths of others ?
~;)
I like to think of it as a friendly warning rather than some kind of threat the mafia would make...
Sometimes they do. They are catching mafia, after all.Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly
~;)
I can't hear you through those five coffin lids.Quote:
I like to think of it as a friendly warning rather than some kind of threat the mafia would make...
Vote: Abstain
I've got an essay to write and no time to sit around and hammer out a vote. I am not amused at ATPG's attempt to kill me.
I arranged the pt group which saved you, too. Not that it matters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotix
:laugh4:
Ok... what, did ya run out of more important things to do?
Actually, yes. But there's more.... I'll PM ya.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaotix
Sometimes they do. They are catching mafia, after all
I have been chasing me some killers recently as well... group of pyscho's that like chopping people up...any ideas ?
Im glad to now that im so dangerous that even in death i have several lids on my coffin... or is that just a guilty concise coming through..
In case you didn't get the joke, you're in several different coffins. :laugh4: Not to worry, he will join you soon. And it is my hope that he meets a similar fate.Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
A lot of people say you are a bad guy.
Ha, now that's a scummy vote.
Gee, would you like to address the fact that a vig group you were in failed?
Would you like to address your continued lurking?
No, you're just going to pop in and vote for the guy with the most votes. Indeed, you seem to be the third person to vote for me - the position most likely to be mafia.
vote: Xehh II
And your reason for voting me? A lot of people say I'm bad? I have dutifully sent in protection orders each night, and multiple investigations have proven I'm not part of any mafia family.
The only one saying I'm guilty is the same one who says ATPG should be lynched beside me.
CR
Or, you could vote for Shinseikhaan. :2thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
But you won't, same reason Lord Winter wouldn't vote for you.
Vote: Shinseikhaan
What is the evidence against Shinseikhaan?Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
CR
Unvote:XehhII Vote:CR
The VERY SAME evidence being used against Xehh, PLUS:Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
Shinseikhaan had been killing townies all game on purpose in vigilante groups.
AND
Shinseikhaan has a guilty result, while Xehh has an unclear
AND
When he became Director, the beretta weapon disappeared from the writeup.
Unvote, Vote: Shinseikhaan.
I thought it was just one kill, at the very beginning of the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
Hmm. Are no mades unclear?Quote:
AND
Shinseikhaan has a guilty result, while Xehh has an unclear
And a guilty result would seem to say Shinseikhaan is a wiseguy who has killed at least once, which would validate his claims.
That's wrong. The mafia killers of the last night dropped a violin bow on their victim; that's the same calling card as the former 'beretta weapon' killer. Since the beretta killer dropped a bow as a calling card, it seems likely to me he's a rogue don. But if he has killers working for him (as it would appear), he wouldn't be able to kill at night.Quote:
AND
When he became Director, the beretta weapon disappeared from the writeup.
To me, Xehh II is acting much, much more scummy.
Now that's just silly. You have a very scummy acting player who lurks continuously in Xehh II. He doesn't even bother to try to respond to any accusations, he just bandwagons, and as the third voter. His post voting for me has got to be one of scummiest ones in mafia game history.Quote:
Unvote:XehhII Vote:CR
I, however, and doing my best to increase thread discussion and investigate killers in our midst. If you vote for me, you're encouraging lurkers like Xehh II and every other killer out there - telling them they can get by lurking.
If you want to scare the mafia out of the shadows and into the thread, vote for the lurker Xehh II.
CR
ATPG...
Lynch him.
This is like leaving Sasaki alone. Get rid of him!
Speaking of that, why is Sasaki around?
Erm.... I have to check my notes, but he did several that I know of. And not only were they blind ones at the beginning of the game, but they went progressively towards people he suspected were doctors or otherwise working with me in a positive manner, and he even admitted as such.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
No, wiseguys can be unclear, Mades cannot. None have been so far, anyway. And we have 5 dead mades, too.Quote:
Hmm. Are no mades unclear?
I think he claimed to be a townie at the start, but he clearly went for racking up kills to become mafia. And I haven't gotten the result back from last night, which, if criminal, dooms him entirely.Quote:
And a guilty result would seem to say Shinseikhaan is a wiseguy who has killed at least once, which would validate his claims.
Same card, different weapon. And the calling card there was the fact he was dressed as a Rabbit. In my opinion, that was an attempt to confuse us into thinking that he was either the Rabbit killer or the beretta killer, he can't be both, because the Rabbit uses a shotgun.Quote:
That's wrong. The mafia killers of the last night dropped a violin bow on their victim; that's the same calling card as the former 'beretta weapon' killer.
To me, ALL the scummy people are voting for Xehh. They obviously want him dead.Quote:
To me, Xehh II is acting much, much more scummy.
I'm not convinced.Quote:
Now that's just silly. You have a very scummy acting player who lurks continuously in Xehh II. He doesn't even bother to try to respond to any accusations, he just bandwagons, and as the third voter. His post voting for me has got to be one of scummiest ones in mafia game history.
I believe I've gone after the lurkers a lot more than you have, actually. This is probably just another attempt to appeal to my biases. First, we have to kill all the commies, now we have to kill all the lurkers.Quote:
I, however, and doing my best to increase thread discussion and investigate killers in our midst. If you vote for me, you're encouraging lurkers like Xehh II and every other killer out there - telling them they can get by lurking.
Those who don't participate will be WOGGED, and if they don't get wogged, they might experience an unfortunate accident.Quote:
If you want to scare the mafia out of the shadows and into the thread, vote for the lurker Xehh II.
CR
Oh, right. Well, townies should register as guilty when participating in vigilante kills.Quote:
I think he claimed to be a townie at the start, but he clearly went for racking up kills to become mafia. And I haven't gotten the result back from last night, which, if criminal, dooms him entirely.
:laugh4: I wasn't talking to you. It is your bias that you are the epicenter of the game that made you think that. ~;pQuote:
I believe I've gone after the lurkers a lot more than you have, actually. This is probably just another attempt to appeal to my biases. First, we have to kill all the commies, now we have to kill all the lurkers.
Oh my. You've misunderstood the fundamental point. He could not be the beretta killer, who is pretty clearly a rogue don. I had assumed you knew that dons, once all their family is dead, become solo killers, but still leave calling cards. Given that the 'beretta killer' left a violin bow on each victim, it's clear he's a rogue don.Quote:
Same card, different weapon. And the calling card there was the fact he was dressed as a Rabbit. In my opinion, that was an attempt to confuse us into thinking that he was either the Rabbit killer or the beretta killer, he can't be both, because the Rabbit uses a shotgun.
Now if khaan was a don, he wouldn't have been making kills as a townie vigilante early in the game.
So when you rule out that possibility, you have two people who are similar in that they may be wiseguys.
And so I choose the lurker with the scummy bandwagon votes.
CR
Morning.
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
Try as I might, I fail to see how you can consider yourself to have been cleared.
[And yes, you should have gone before now.]
Ok, I can vote intelligently now that I'm not pre-occupied.
Honestly, I'm not buying the CR case simply because when we tried to lynch him a few nights ago, we wound up with that mistaken investigation case, where, at the end, Seamus pretty much implied he wasn't mafia.
Xehh II or 'khaan, though, with their criminal records after killing, seem more convincing.
Unvote, Vote: Xehh II
I was investigated and came back guilty on a night with no mafia killings. That means I'm a wiseguy who has killed without the support of any mafia family. And I admitted long ago that I was part of a vigilante kill on Jolt.
It also means, very importantly, that I am not part of any mafia family.
I am one of the very few people actually trying to get a discussion going in the thread. That is how the remaining mafia are going to be caught. They certainly won't be caught by ATPG, who seems to not know some basic capo rules (regarding rogue dons).
The town wins with information, after all.
CR
Oh my. Just got some interesting info.
According to my notes, we have someone who did a vigilante kill *successfully* and now has an innocent result.
I am checking with those vigilantes to confirm that this player did indeed send in orders and was their partner.
Atpg don't you dare let him go again (PM coming your way)... :stare: Why do you think I've been holding off on chewing you out after the CR bandwagon started? :joker:Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
A couple of thoughts:
On the SK vs rogue Dons, Seamus has had special roles in both previous Capo games, including SK's in both. I think the 5th original Don is dead (just not ID'd yet) and we are dealing with newly crowned Dons and SK's among the other Mafia.
For example, Rhyfelwer, despite Atpg's insistence that he is communist (without any clarification by Seamus...) was more likely a special role, something more likely given he protected people as I vouch.
After such a long time, CR (and khaan) are finally going to go. :2thumbsup: My restless spirit will now be at rest. :bow:
I still think Atpg should at least be neutered (by Directorship) if not lynched outright after those two go. Extreme paranoia at the end cant hurt with a guy with a questionable record against townies because Xehh II is a good guy.