Cuter Than Palin

http://www.argusleader.com/article/2...NEWS/11030323/

From the rough and tumble South Dakota at large

Kristi Noem.

I'd let her balance my budget.

IYKWIMAITYD

You fools, look at what you could have had!

Mild ('mother I'd like to date') Kirsti is nowhere near as hot as her opponent Herseth Sandlin!!

https://img526.imageshack.us/img526/...27jc080310.jpg

Doable, but I think our Femke has better arguments http://blikopsittard.files.wordpress...-halsema-2.jpg

And certainly our Marianne http://www.publiek-politiek.nl/conte...annethieme.jpg

Would let neither handle my budget though, and I would declaw them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

Doable, but I think our Femke has better arguments http://blikopsittard.files.wordpress...-halsema-2.jpg

---

Uhm....... No. Just no.

Also Louis, no babes outside the babe thread!! I'll have you whipped!

Marianne from the dutch is nice, but you probably already knew that you got nothing on Yulia Tymoshenko.

Absolutely nothing at all. ~;)

Nobody has anything on that Italian minister of whateverwhocares http://orderorder.files.wordpress.co...c_carfagna.jpg

@Horetore you suck skippyballs through a straw, Femke is a classy woman. We are a bit in a love hate relationship, when she opens her mouth spell is broken stuff should go in it not the other way around.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

Nobody has anything on that Italian minister of whateverwhocares http://orderorder.files.wordpress.co...c_carfagna.jpg

@Horetore you suck skippyballs through a straw, Femke is a classy woman. We are a bit in a love hate relationship, when she opens her mouth spell is broken stuff should go in it not the other way around.

---

I wouldn't touch her even if she paid me.

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Her majesty was better (when she's young), as our royal bloodline gave us beautiful princess.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat

Mild ('mother I'd like to date')

---

You came up with that term yourself?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

Her majesty was better (when she's young), as our royal bloodline gave us beautiful princess.

---

Yes a perfect blend of nazi and junta genes, and it allready shows in that little monster when she pulls other kids from stuff she wants to play with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

Doable, but I think our Femke has better arguments http://blikopsittard.files.wordpress...-halsema-2.jpg

And certainly our Marianne http://www.publiek-politiek.nl/conte...annethieme.jpg

Would let neither handle my budget though, and I would declaw them.

---

herseth sandlin > femke halsema

though femke halsema is definitly cute for a dutch politician.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

Uhm....... No. Just no.

Also Louis, no babes outside the babe thread!! I'll have you whipped!

---

that is not a good picture btw... fragony has no style XD besides he is an old man



http://www.nettyroyal.nl/charlotte.html

yummie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

that is not a good picture btw... fragony has no style XD besides he is an old man



http://www.nettyroyal.nl/charlotte.html

yummie

---

Too bad she's a royal, and therefore inbred.... As I want healthy children, she's out of the picture.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

Too bad she's a royal, and therefore inbred.... As I want healthy children, she's out of the picture.

---

Silly Horetore everyone knows all they do is marry well, the actual breeding is done with the servants don't you know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

Too bad she's a royal, and therefore inbred.... As I want healthy children, she's out of the picture.

---

technically you are inbred too! its all in the bible you know

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

You came up with that term yourself?

---

Yes, and on the spot too! I make 'em up as I go. I'm easy like that. You put in a quarter, you press 'play', and Louis does his thing. It never stops.

I for one am going to be suspicious of any politician with charisma or good looks etc etc for the rest of my life to paraphrase willy shakespere "Let me have politicians about me that are fat; Sleek-headed ones and such as sleep o' nights"

We had over ten years of an apparently ordinary man "Who got it" and who "You could have a beer with" apparently had charm the X-factor etc an easy relationship with people he was the man to lead us, everyone else was grey and boring.

Well like the Piper in Hamlein he led us off the cliff, honestly ordinary man what a laugh he was driven round this country for over approx 30yrs in state cars he was far from an ordinary man.

This Palin craic will bite ye all in the :daisy: bigtime she is just another Hope/Change politician but it's Change the social order and Hope God fixes the economy

it's freaky how close to reality this joke is becoming:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqI2i_fIdP0

"I think we can go dumber!".

hehe XD

This is a superficial topic guys, we want nothing to do with sense and reason here, it's all about the looks. ~;)

Well there is this Belgian female politician who posed nude on the cover of a magazine, but well I obviously can't post that. But if you're 18 or older you could google Barbara Steeman. She isn't really a high profile politician though.

This female politician promised us 400.000 'jobs'. :o
http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/741...0981978251CF77

Annick De Ridder could be doable after a night of heavy drinking:
http://www.demorgen.be/static/FOTO/p..._l_1595465.jpg

Kim Geybels, great body, but the face ain't all that...:
http://www.nieuwsblad.be/Assets/Imag...70.jpg.280.jpg

Bah. Jill Filipovic (feminist activist) trumps all.

https://img560.imageshack.us/img560/...lfilipovic.jpg

but can she cook

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psychonaut

Bah. Jill Filipovic (feminist activist) trumps all.

https://img560.imageshack.us/img560/...lfilipovic.jpg

---

this one cracks me up!!! a feminist activist with a typical 16 year old "guys look how sexy i am" picture!

im so macho =_=

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

this one cracks me up!!! a feminist activist with a typical 16 year old "guys look how sexy i am" picture!

im so macho =_=

---

That came to mind chez-Frag as well, but she's hot in a girl-next-door kinda way. Italian minister of roflwhocares remains unchallenged imho.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

this one cracks me up!!! a feminist activist with a typical 16 year old "guys look how sexy i am" picture!

im so macho =_=

---

Why on earth should being feminist be in opposition to wanting to be/feel sexy....?



That's like saying you have to be a virgin to say that you think the focus on sex has gone too far in society.

There is Sexual Liberation movement and a movement against the abuse of women/stereotypes for sex within the feminist movement.

Different factions want different things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

Why on earth should being feminist be in opposition to wanting to be/feel sexy....?



That's like saying you have to be a virgin to say that you think the focus on sex has gone too far in society.

---

no thats not what i mean. im just saying the pose is a typical pose for 16 year old girls who wanna take daring on/off the edge fotos to seduce innocent young boys into their flesh eating vaginas.

i mean... how serious would you take a feminist activist who stars in a ****movie (not the lesbian one... but german hardcore XD)

How seriously does anyone take feminists anyway, they are just people that need a problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

How seriously does anyone take feminists anyway, they are just people that need a problem.

---

Well... last time this subject came up, I believe one poster said a womans place is in the home should not be in the work place and another poster told a moderators wife to shut up and make him a sandwich.

I don't think the 'problem' has disappeared yet.

You mean he still didn't get the damn sandwich?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

How seriously does anyone take feminists anyway, they are just people that need a problem.

---

Feminist fɛmənɪst noun

1. A person who supports the equality of women with men.
2. A member of a feminist political movement.
3. One who believes in the social, political, and economical equality of the sexes.

I guess you shouldn't take me seriously then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psychonaut

I guess you shouldn't take me seriously then.

---

It's just the hardline femininists that go to the trouble of calling themselves feminists that insist on taking the underlined bits above to their natural conclusions, which doesn't work and ends up in stupidity. Women cannot be fully equal with men, they will never be as strong, for example (generally speaking).

The average person on the other had simply wants women to have the right to choose what they want to do with their life, whether it be pursuing a career or working in the kitchen. Because the reality is women, when given the choice, are going to be more likely than men to want to do the latter. It's not all social conditioning either, it's just biology.

Ever heard a feminist getting worked up over the dominance of males picking up the trash it really doesn't represent society I feel it should be 50/50, can't all lead a multinational after all. We need a quotum, force it.

There has been a bit of a flap over here cos two women politicians resigned from standing at the next election and there is no sign of a women to takeover. Apparently the solution is to create a list of women candidates at least thats what our "Betters" believe yes the smashing of democracy is how we shall ensure more representation of women in the Dail.

It will fail utterly to actually elect any of the women though of course as Irish politics is clientelist and parochial by nature, this is simply due to the fact we live in a small country. I could state on the org my inention to go to Offaly and have a chat with Brian Cowen tomorrow and there is a better than 60%-70% chance I could do it no hassle.

Yep, don't forget to fight gender discrimination by putting women into political office on merit of the fact that they are women.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

Yep, don't forget to fight gender discrimination by putting women into political office on merit of the fact that they are women.

---

We did something similar here.

We forced all companies to have at least 40% of both sexes represented at the boards(which in practice meant increasing the percentage of women to 40), if not then they would be shut down. This applied to every company represented at the stock exchange. Of course, everyone on the right went nuts, saying that we should only select those who are qualified, that the women will be scorned, etc etc. You know, the normal hysteria.

But what actually happened? There was a time limit, I believe it was in 2008, and all the companies had a few years to comply. Naturally, some went about conforming quickly, others delayed. What's interesting, is that every company who got more women on their boards early performed better than those who delayed. The sooner you filled up with women, the better your company performed.


In conclusion: of course I believe that people should be chosen on their qualifications, not their sex or whatever. But I also believe that the people who own companies are completely incapable of selecting the best qualified people to be on their boards. And if they are forced to widen their pool of potential candidates and are forbidden to go with their first instincts, then they will be more likely to pick the best people. Because honestly, most business owners have shown themselves to be utterly incompetent.

So the ends justified the means. Meh, happens I guess.

Quote:

---

We forced all companies to have at least 40% of both sexes represented at the boards

---

Is this what Norway worries about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

So the ends justified the means. Meh, happens I guess.

---

As company owners have shown themselves to be completely incompetent when it comes to hiring people, the means are justified on their own.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

As company owners have shown themselves to be completely incompetent when it comes to hiring people, the means are justified on their own.

---

And the government is... competent?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

And the government is... competent?

---

As this example shows:

At least more competent.




EDIT: Though to be fair, I have always viewed the government as competent, or competent enough anyway. There is certainly no less waste of resources in the government than there has been in the other places I've worked, Shell and Autolink in particular. Shell has a bureaucracy that would've made Lenin blush, while Autolink has a policy of paying double wages for labour working at 50%.....

EDIT AGAIN: This excludes the military of course, nobody can compete with that retarded organization when it comes to wasting stuff. But then again, the entire military is waste, so........ :clown:

Companies who prepare early to achieve new government sanctioned quota, seem to be lead effectively. Naturally those do better overall...:juggle2:

The workers in the sugar plant in Mallow probably would disagree on the government competence angle.

Greencore sugar plant closure 'not necessary'

The European Court of Auditors has found that the closure of the Greencore sugar plant in Mallow in 2006 may not have been necessary.

The European Court of Auditors has found that the closure of the Greencore sugar plant in Mallow in 2006, with the loss of 240 jobs, may not have been necessary.
The closure came about as a result of a major restructuring of the EU sugar sector following world trade rulings and a drive to make the sector more competitive.
But in a highly critical report published this afternoon the Court of Auditors says that the European Commission was using out of date information, that overall sugar production had become less competitive as a result of the reforms, and that the cut in prices was not passed on to consumers.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Ireland's member of the European Court of Auditors, Eoin O'Shea, told RTÉ News: 'It's possible that [the Greencore Plant] would still be operating today if it were not for the sugar reforms introduced by the European Commission.'
In 2005 and 2006, the EU negotiated a major reform of the sugar sector partly because subsidised European production allegedly hurt small producers in the developing world.
The plan was to reduce production by 6m tonnes or 30% by 2010 and it was partly done by cutting the price of sugar by 36%.
At the time, there were 285,000 sugar beet growers in the EU, a figure that has since been reduced to 164,000.
In all 75 sugar factories, including the Greencore plant, closed with the loss of 20,000 jobs.
According to the report into the sector by the Luxembourg-based European Court of Auditors, Ireland was the only member state with just one factory to close.
It described the factory as 'large, modern and potentially efficient'.
The European Commission had argued at the time that only factories that became unprofitable after the price cuts were implemented would have closed.
However, today's report shows that 'no comparison of the productivity of individual producers or factories was available'.
It also showed that the Commission was using data from 2001 and that it had not taken account of changes within the Greencore operation when its proposal was made in 2005.
Overall, the report says, sugar production was not made more competitive. It is now controlled by a small few - 75% of the EU's production is now carried out by only six industrial groups.
It says that ultimately the EU has had to become a net importer of sugar, whereas before it was a net exporter. It also said that reductions in the bulk price of sugar were not passed on to the consumer.
Ireland received €213m in restructuring aid after the closure of the Greencore plant, in which 240 factory workers and 3,700 growers lost their jobs.
At the time, much of the debate during the negotiations between member states and the European Commission was over compensation and how much should be shared between Greencore and the workers.
Some Irish farmers fought for the plant to be kept open, while others focussed on what compensation could be achieved.
Ireland East MEP Mairead McGuinness said: 'It is very clear that the Commission has questions to answer arising from the Court of Auditors report. Lessons need to be learned.
'The sugar reforms resulted in the complete loss of the Irish sugar industry.'
Fine Gael Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Spokesperson Andrew Doyle said the report leads to the inescapable conclusion that the Government of the time was asleep at the wheel.
Labour Agriculture Spokesperson Sean Sherlock said that in the wake of the finding, serious questions arise as to the suitability of Mary Coughlan for high office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Strike For The South

Is this what Norway worries about?

---

Euro thingie, everything MUST BE A REPRESENTATION OF SOCIETY. Under labour it went so far here that you couldn't get a promotion at (highest levels of) the police if you are a white male, no matter how qualified. Nope that is not rightwing bull that was policy, that's what they care about ES MUSS SEIN

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

Euro thingie, everything MUST BE A REPRESENTATION OF SOCIETY. Under labour it went so far here that you couldn't get a promotion at (highest levels of) the police if you are a white male, no matter how qualified. Nope that is not rightwing bull that was policy, that's what they care about ES MUSS SEIN

---

.....And it resulted in companies performing better. Explain how that is bad, Frags?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

.....And it resulted in companies performing better.

---

Says who, exactly. That's like asking the IPCC if the earth is warming up. If they are qualified they'll get there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

Says who, exactly.

---

The people who count the money they made from said companies.

Checking whether a stock goes up or down is actually rather easy to check....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

The people who count the money they made from said companies.

Checking whether a stock goes up or down is actually rather easy to check....

---

And cherry-picked molded if you have a cause, show me something real

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

And cherry-picked molded if you have a cause, show me something real

---

.....are you accusing the stock exchange of favouring feminism....?

say what you want... but royalty pwns!

http://www.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=h...1t:429,r:3,s:0

"Norwegian Princess Martha Louise has announced that she is clairvoyant and wants to help people by teaching them how to talk to angels."

Seems the effects of inbreeding were less visible in this one...

who cares that shes crazy as long as shes hot... no one cared that angelina jolie was crazy as a stick...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

who cares that shes crazy as long as shes hot... no one cared that angelina jolie was crazy as a stick...

---

She's not "hot" in any way either, she's just a mental pasient unaware of her condition. A sad thing, really.

well... she used to be sexy XD on the screen anyway. or are you talking about the princess now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

well... she used to be sexy XD on the screen anyway. or are you talking about the princess now?

---

Yes, that was the lobotomized princess.

And don't you talk smack about my darling Angelina, she's coming to live with me after she's got Brad Pitt's money!!!!!

why is she crazy??? cuz she talks to angels... whatever half the globe hears voices. u know what is crazy? pretending to by normal, like everyone else...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

why is she crazy??? cuz she talks to angels... whatever half the globe hears voices. u know what is crazy? pretending to by normal, like everyone else...

---

She has voices in her head, and they're not coming from anyone around her.

If that's not a sign of mental disorder, I don't know what is.

i dont see how that is a mental disorder. perhaps a mental deviation... its just labeled as a mental disorder. some people hear their own voices when they think some dont... who is to judge which one is sane and which one isnt...

perhaps her conclusion is farfetched but doesnt make her insane

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

i dont see how that is a mental disorder. perhaps a mental deviation... its just labeled as a mental disorder. some people hear their own voices when they think some dont... who is to judge which one is sane and which one isnt...

perhaps her conclusion is farfetched but doesnt make her insane

---

When you're convinced you can talk to fairytale creatures; yes, you are.

i never read the book :P have no intentions either... i wouldnt dismiss angels as fairy tale creatures only because you and i dont believe in them... oh well.. cant be bothered to defend her :P call her a loon all you want to but the pictures ive seen of her... she looked pretty beautiful on them XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

i never read the book :P have no intentions either... i wouldnt dismiss angels as fairy tale creatures only because you and i dont believe in them... oh well.. cant be bothered to defend her :P call her a loon all you want to but the pictures ive seen of her... she looked pretty beautiful on them XD

---

There is no such thing as an "angel" and it's impossible to talk to dead people.

End of story.

The ones who believe they can are either insane or con-artists and belong in either a mental hospital or jail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

There is no such thing as an "angel" and it's impossible to talk to dead people.

End of story.

The ones who believe they can are either insane or con-artists and belong in either a mental hospital or jail.

---

Hear hear!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

There is no such thing as an "angel" and it's impossible to talk to dead people.

End of story.

The ones who believe they can are either insane or con-artists and belong in either a mental hospital or jail.

---

what makes you so certain that there are none. because billions of people before you have believed otherwise

and dont even dare to make a scientific claim or analogy because this is not a scientific matter, this is a bout a truth or non-truth science can make no claim about that is more or less true than any other

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

.....are you accusing the stock exchange of favouring feminism....?

---

No I accuse feminists of claiming said succes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

what makes you so certain that there are none. because billions of people before you have believed otherwise

and dont even dare to make a scientific claim or analogy because this is not a scientific matter, this is a bout a truth or non-truth science can make no claim about that is more or less true than any other

---

"Billions of people" before me have also believed a cat crossing the street before you or breaking a mirror means bad luck.

In short: dead people are dead and angels are the delusions of the insane.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

No I accuse feminists of claiming said succes.

---

The ones who published the numbers and came with the obvious conclusion were not feminists, frags, but rather economists working for a financial institution(they're big on statistics you know).

Yeah yeah, conclusion on demand, easy to credit economic growth to giraffes dancing the flamingo if you try hard enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

"Billions of people" before me have also believed a cat crossing the street before you or breaking a mirror means bad luck.

---

so nothing here makes it clear that they were wrong. you just state a fact you dont give any arguments about why they werent right. and like i said, science wont do here. you have to beat them on their own turf.

with such a line of reasoning you might as well say

angels dont exist because this morning i had breakfast.



or to make a better one


what you say now is wrong because something entirely else you said before was also wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

"Billions of people" before me have also believed a cat crossing the street before you or breaking a mirror means bad luck.

---

I'm a bit skeptical of just how superstitious people were on the past. Just because they had their good/bad luck things doesn't mean they really took them seriously, I remember something about this on the BBC and a lot of people today still won't walk under a ladder if they can avoid it. Doesn't mean they take it too seriously, just one of these things, I have a feeling people in the past were the same. :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

I'm a bit skeptical of just how superstitious people were on the past. Just because they had their good/bad luck things doesn't mean they really took them seriously, I remember something about this on the BBC and a lot of people today still won't walk under a ladder if they can avoid it. Doesn't mean they take it too seriously, just one of these things, I have a feeling people in the past were the same. :shrug:

---

These things die hard Rhy I know people who are still a bit afraid to interfere with what people colloquially call a fairy fort usually just an ancient burial cairn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

There is no such thing as an "angel" and it's impossible to talk to dead people.

End of story.

The ones who believe they can are either insane or con-artists and belong in either a mental hospital or jail.

---

You're such an angel...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

There is no such thing as an "angel" and it's impossible to talk to dead people.

End of story.

The ones who believe they can are either insane or con-artists and belong in either a mental hospital or jail.

---

There are others:

The berieved, who in their grieving despair want to believe it all makes sense, serves some sort of purpose.
Those who are left behind, with unfinished business with the deceased, whom they 'talk to'.
The lonely, the abandoned, the wretched, who still want believe in something.

Some really do believe, Some believe, but know deep down it is not real, but have to cling on to it for consolation. They don't all belong in a mental hospital. Of all the nasty things people do, should it be a poor widower who talks to her deceased husband who should be send to a mental institution?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat

There are others:

The berieved, who in their grieving despair want to believe it all makes sense, serves some sort of purpose.
Those who are left behind, with unfinished business with the deceased, whom they 'talk to'.
The lonely, the abandoned, the wretched, who still want believe in something.

Some really do believe, Some believe, but know deep down it is not real, but have to cling on to it for consolation. They don't all belong in a mental hospital. Of all the nasty things people do, should it be a poor widower who talks to her deceased husband who should be send to a mental institution?

---

Like they say on South Park:

"When you die, don't you rather want real peace than float around talking to this :daisy: hole?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

I remember something about this on the BBC and a lot of people today still won't walk under a ladder if they can avoid it.

---

Well, that is because people don't want objects dropped on their head, or the ladder to collapse on them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Beskar

Well, that is because people don't want objects dropped on their head, or the ladder to collapse on them.

---

Bingo!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Beskar

Well, that is because people don't want objects dropped on their head, or the ladder to collapse on them.

---

No! Though who knows maybe that's where the superstition around these things came from.

I just doubt anybody really believed that a black cat was going to cause them bad luck.

doesnt matter horetore makes his truth and his contemporary truth into a universal and eternal truth. bad bad horetore... he cant stake the claims he makes. perhaps in 400 years the people will be laughing that we ever thought that it was true that angels didnt exist or that it was true that we cause global warming etc etc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr

No! Though who knows maybe that's where the superstition around these things came from.

I just doubt anybody really believed that a black cat was going to cause them bad luck.

---

The ladder one is about not breaking a "Trinity" made from the ground the wall and the ladder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

doesnt matter horetore makes his truth and his contemporary truth into a universal and eternal truth. bad bad horetore... he cant stake the claims he makes. perhaps in 400 years the people will be laughing that we ever thought that it was true that angels didnt exist or that it was true that we cause global warming etc etc

---

Yes, because the people who believe in angels aren't making up their own truth.....................yes..............

But I guess logic goes out the window for some people when they reflect upon their faith... If they reflect upon it at all, that is.

EDIT: If someone said to you that Sauron was real and that his best friend was Gandalf, whom he talked to every day.... What would you call that?

nuts. XD

im not at all a believer btw i dunno if your second comment was aimed at me. and my logic is quite sharp. check the multiculti thread, i have the same debate with sasaki.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

nuts. XD

---

....and how is it any different from believing in angels...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stranger

im not at all a believer btw i dunno if your second comment was aimed at me. and my logic is quite sharp. check the multiculti thread, i have the same debate with sasaki.

---

The second comment was aimed at everyone who believes in angels and other fantasy creatures.