https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vXHxbCgg3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...ud3fVGZU#t=31s
WE ARE PEOPLE! WE ARE PEOPLE! THIS IS WHAT DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE!
Printable View
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vXHxbCgg3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...ud3fVGZU#t=31s
WE ARE PEOPLE! WE ARE PEOPLE! THIS IS WHAT DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE!
Looks a bit like the London riots where a bunch of, shall we say, less than bright people get caught on camera doing stuff they shouldn't.
More like, "This is what a pack of drunken college students with misplaced loyalties looks like". :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
You don't see pro-pedophile rallies very often, so bonus points for sheer novelty.
In all fairness, it's a pro pedophile-enabler rally. I doubt they are rioting for Sandusky's sake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
Talk about screwed up priorities. What a waste of education.
[rant]I really cannot understand the ridiculously outsized role sports play in our society and especially the mindset of 'the fan'.
I get the appeal of playing sports, but there is nothing more insufferable in my opinion than sitting around watching other people play sports. And yet so many people are so completely wrapped up in 'their' team that it becomes their lifestyle, their defining identity. So much time, energy, and money is wasted in the hope of winning transient championships that have no effect on anyone's lives except those directly involved with the team. I mean why does it really matter who wins x,y, or z championship? I hate coming into work and hearing the 'fans' talk about how 'we' did, as if they had anything at all to do with the outcome of the latest meaningless game. IMO, sports are a great distraction for boring people living boring lives who can only live vicariously through the achievements of others.
And its gotten so crazy that universities are spending very limited funds to build new facilities and stadiums and hire more staff for the team while raising tuition and letting classrooms deteriorate. My university just spent millions to build a specialized tailgating parking lot so the idiots can sit around for hours before the game in anticipation of sitting around for hours at the game. Violence over team rivalries is now common. And corruption in getting the best players is just as common. And now we are all hearing about the absolute insanity that went on at the highest levels of Penn State to save the reputation of the football program. These were grown men who decided that a game was more important than stopping a pedophile. The rioting is just the icing on the cake - the ultimate expression of a society with its priorities completely off kilter.[/rant]
The crowds love their bread and circuses right?Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
If Paterno had done anything wrong, these riots would not have happened. He was a convenient scapgoat for the Board of Trustees to demonstrate that they were taking action. There were repeated failures on numerous occassions within and outside the university over a number of years and Paterno was the one who paid the price. Curley, the athletic director, is up on charges and he wasn't fired. McQueary, who was the actual witness, was not fired, though today he was put on "administrative leave".
What many fail to understand is that this is not about football. Sure, part of it is, but legacy of Joe Paterno goes beyond football. He is the face and the spirit of intergrity at Penn State. For 46 years as head coach he was the university's biggest cheerleader in sports and academics. He taught his players discipline and integrity. When asked which of his teams was the best, his criteria for judgement is based on what they did/will do with their lives off the football field. He expected his players to attend their classes. We as students, alumni and fans took pride in that integrity and what Paterno stands for. He made us proud of who WE ARE. He pushed his players to be better people and it rubbed off on the rest of us. Paterno built a career and a lifetime to better people and better the university.
A lifetime's exemplary work and reputation was trashed in the matter of a few days because it was convenient for the Board. That is why the students were rioting. If Paterno did orchestrate a coverup, the students wouldn't be rioting in support of him. They (we all) would be devastated and then probably angry at him - feeling crushed and betrayed. But at the present, with what we know, the Board fired the spirit of the university and the one person who did what he was supposed to do. In hindsight, with knowledge of a very graphic grand jury report of multiple offenses, we (and Paterno) know he did not do the best thing (calling the police himself), but he did do the right thing.
This has been a horrible week. I've been walking around with a pit in my stomach most of the time. Sandusky had a squeaky clean public reputation - an excellent coach and a great person. That he was capable of doing such horrid acts was stunning and sickening. That McQueary, Shultz and to a lesser extent Curley and in the earlier cases the janitor and others of the university police let this happen is incomprehendable. Where was our integrity? We are supposed to do the right thing and stop this, not look the other way. Paterno's failure? Trusting that others would do their job and do the right thing.
It is a good thing I'll be working during the football game tomorrow, because I don't know how I will react if they win or lose.
Anyway, sorry babbling. I've been wrestling not only with horrible crimes and my school's role in them, but also listening to lots of nasty (and some very stupid) things being said by the media and on the internet about a group of people of which I'm a part and I've been keeping my thoughts bottled up all week. I know we here at the Org all frown upon judging people by the group so I know I won't see any of that here. ~;)
hmm I watch football every Sunday but I agree. Many people use it to fill a gap in their lives, rather than just being entertained for a few hours.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
Don't you think he had the responsibility to make sure the right thing got done? You can't just pass the buck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
I wish I had more information to form an opinion. However, Greg’s post is probably the most relevant ultimately.
You’re a person playing historical-themed PC games with eight thousand posts on a gaming forum. Don’t tell me you don’t understand escapism or that you have not witnessed far too many times vicarious debates unfolding through “Us” against “Them” paradigm.Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ
As an observation, the most erudite historians are among the human beings most prone to escapism. It's pathetic but you have to allow it to them, their dedication stems in large part from this.
Nowadays sports fans are the successors of generations who did not have today’s means to live mental vacations at their disposal and adult-organized outdoor games were a perfect outlet, especially by allowing them to express their suppressed feelings of aggression.
It won’t last that much longer, in fifty years this type of past-time will be obsolete. Would be outdated even faster if not for the powerful attachment created during early childhood and adolescence by sharing such moments with (male) relatives and friends. This generational heritage will be phased out slowly.
I also enjoy playing sports. What do all three activities have in common that sitting around watching other people do them do not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowake
Also, I just want to throw in there that for many (not all) universities, football or basketball programs generate a net profit that helps the university including the academics. So talking about how terrible the priorities are is misguided if you don't know what the situation really is.
Why do we have this level of sports involved at all though? You can still talk about priorities.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
I think it's weird the amount of stuff that's packaged into "the college experience". It should mostly be academics.
I have to say, I agree. Once people use sport as a way of filling a hole in their life and as a way of living vicariously through the 'team' they clearly have their priorities well out of order. When these people get in power or those in power pander to this audience (who, more often than not, react well to this pandering due to the narrow focus of their lives), the social priorities are simultaneously thrown askew.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
Penn State should forfeit the rest of their games this season. Any Board Trustee that was present during the time frame of this crime should step down/ be fired. They allowed an accused sexual predator of children to continue his abuse for years. There's been a cover-up and the people in charge of Penn State and their football program put the millions of $$$ that it generates for the college ahead of those abused boys. The governing body for college football should suspend Penn State's program till the full truth be known. Future civil lawsuits, and the loss of doners will cost the college dearly. There won't be any joy in Happy Valley till those responsible are held accountable. I feel badly for those like Greg that feel let down by this failure of integrity. Demand it be made right.
Well sport has had good effects tooQuote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
After the civl war in Ireland it was the GAA that helped to channel the energy of the people away from killing each other and into sports.
IT is the right of these people to riot over these bad firings. I mean, in a way those boys deserved what they got for dressing in little league outfits and they would have never been in those situations had they not done things like go to school. Everyone is blaming that old man, and I don't think he's guilty, he's not even Catholic.
What the hell is a Penn State anyway???
A university, I expect. Penn being short for Pennsylvania.
Bingo. Sport serves one of the most basic psychological needs for many people: that of identity.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
It also gives a convenient means to settle tensions in a somewhat civilised manner, as opposed to petty war. You could, in theory, have the entire Afghanistan war settle through a regular football cup, the psychological ingredients for it to happen are there.
It is your 19th century English toff heritage: the scholar athlete, mensa sana in corpore sano, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
the sports team is the tribe...Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
Hmm, there's some old English book about being a soccer fan and the sense of community that I can't recall the title of right now.
Anyways, a thoughtful article on the whole affair from Paterno's biographer;
These college kids, in a tense atmosphere, sure seem a heck of a lot better at communicating ideas than the occupy folks;Quote:
1. Joe Paterno is responsible for what happens on his watch. Period.
2. People are making assumptions about what Joe did or didn’t know, what Joe did or didn’t do, and I can’t tell you that those assumptions are wrong. But I can tell you that they are assumptions based on one side of the story.
3. We are in a top-you world where everyone is not only trying to report something faster but is also trying to report something ANGRIER. One guy wants Joe Paterno to resign, the next wants him to be fired, the next wants him to be fired this minute, the next wants him to be fired and arrested, the next wants him to be fired, arrested and jailed, on and on, until we’ve lost sight of who actually committed the crimes here.
4. I think the University could not possibly have handled this worse. It was disgusting and disgraceful, the method in which they fired Joe Paterno after 60 years of service, and yes, I do think Paterno was a scapegoat. Of course he was. I’ve already said that he had to be let go. But to let him dangle out there, take up all the headlines, face the bulk of the media pressure, absolutely, that’s the very definition of scapegoat. Three people were indicted and arrested. A fourth, I hear, will be indicted soon. Joe Paterno is not one of the four.
5. It is still unclear what Paterno did in this case. It will remain unclear for a while. You might be one of the hundreds and hundreds of people I’ve heard from who know EXACTLY what Paterno did. He HAD to know this. He DEFINITELY knew that. He COULD have done something. I respect that. Joe Paterno’s a public figure. You have every right to believe what you want to believe and be absolutely certain about it. But since we have not heard from Joe, not heard from former athletic director Tim Curley, not heard from GA/assistant coach Mike McQueary, not heard from anyone who was in the room, I’ll repeat: It’s unclear. A determined grand jury did not charge Joe Paterno with any crime. A motivated reporting barrage, so far, anyway, has not uncovered a single thing that can tell us definitively what Joe Paterno knew.
You can say that he knew enough to stop this, and I’d say you were right. I have tried so hard to make it clear that I am not defending Joe Paterno’s actions or inactions, but I know that won’t be enough. You may be writing an email right now telling me how terrible child molestation is, how awful a person Joe Paterno is, how awful a person I am for wanting to wait and see. I understand. This case hits emotions that are unstoppable.
But I will say this: Paterno has paid a price here. His job is gone. His life’s work has been soiled. His reputation is in tatters. Maybe that should be the price. Maybe there should be more of a price. You don’t have to type: “Well, his price is nothing like the price of those victims…” I already know that.
But I think the way Joe Paterno has lived his life has earned him something more than instant fury, more than immediate assumptions of the worst, more than the happy cheers of critics who have always believed that there was something phony about the man and his ideals. He deserves what I would hope we all deserve — for the truth to come out, or, anyway, the closest thing to truth we can find.
I don’t think Joe Paterno has gotten that. And I think that’s sad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35NZfcts4tA&feature=player_embedded
CR
I bet that they have a much higher literacy than the OWS folks, too. I bet all sorts of social stats would put them ahead of the OWS folks, for that matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
Really, what did you expect? :shrug:
We have this level of sports because it is human nature to identify yourself as part of a group and then demonize those that are not part of your group. In college when most people start learning about themselves, it is easy to just latch onto their uni's sports teams for identity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Seriously, the amount of elitism in here is just embarrassing. Why do the commoners waste their time, investing so much of themselves into something they have nothing to do with? It's like they are being human? Rabble, rabble rabble, why can't people be as enlightened as me and transcend sports?
If the sports program is a major money grabber for the uni, the uni should place it first, because if it doesn't then everyone is for the worse.
You guys are all talking as if sports haven't been causing riots in LA, or fights between New Yorkers and Bostonians for 100+ years.
Hmm no, I already said I watch football every sunday.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
The issue is that too many people view college as a certain kind of experience that has little to do with anything intellectual and that universities market themselves in that way. Why shouldn't they just have intramural sports?
Fever pitch?Quote:
Originally Posted by CR
That part wasn't directed towards you. I recall you posting in the NFL threads in the frontroom.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I just explained this. College is when most people actually start thinking about what kind of person they will be, not about what they want to know about. So they treat college as an orgy of experiences and "life learning" instead of a place to learn about the world around them. Uni's market themselves in whatever way will get them more money. It just so happens that marketing themselves as a place to learn about yourself and obtain experiences gets them a lot more money then as a place of liberal education.Quote:
The issue is that too many people view college as a certain kind of experience that has little to do with anything intellectual and that universities market themselves in that way. Why shouldn't they just have intramural sports?
As a side note, I am waiting for the flood of hate coming my way on facebook since I just made a comment about how Paterno should have been fired and that the only thing that went wrong was Penn State not coming down harder on the rest involved as well.
Also, isn't fellow orgah Icefrom Penn State? I am interested to hear his thoughts on the manner since if I remember correctly, he just graduated from there.
Actually, this Penn State kid pretty much says exactly what I am thinking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXCZKUp45o0
Notice how the kid giving the "rebuttle" pretty much fails at saying anything meaningful at all besides, "Joe Paterno has done so much for this university". Which basically much just means, Paterno has been a good coach and a good role model....up until now.
EDIT: My god, how long was Penn State covering this kind of stuff up?
http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/uploadedFiles/Press/Sandusky-Grand-Jury-Presentment.pdf
And now, this is coming to a boil?
Yes, so there should be some interlude between high school and college where people first move out and live on their own. Don't know how that would work out specifically though. Maybe everyone who had howard zinn inflicted on them in high school can be forced to take remedial American history.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
I agree with you actually. A year between would be good for many, many people. Unfortunately, that is a personal decision for the individual or his/her parents. The former doesn't know any better and just wants to go to Uni so he/she can get a job as soon as possible and the latter probably is afraid of their son/daughter not ending their year of identification at a year and stagnating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
In regards to your Howard Zinn comment...that's pretty worthless to say considering that regular textbooks do a **** job as well. If history is going to be taught right at that level, it should be explained that no representation of history is going to be completely unbiased. Howard Zinn should be taught along with many other authors and sources.
EDIT:
THIS IS SOME META LEVEL STUFF HERE:
http://www.amazon.com/Touched-Jerry-...1115713&sr=1-1
Maybe the change needs to be done at the high school level. Like a system similar to other countries where students are sorted into different types of high schools.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Nooooooooooo. Zinn does not come anywhere near the bare minimum professional standard. Doesn't even qualify as history--just arguing for an inane ideology. Real historians are vastly different, regardless of their political leanings. You might as well say that people should watch glenn beck and michael moore for "balance".Quote:
In regards to your Howard Zinn comment...that's pretty worthless to say considering that regular textbooks do a **** job as well. If history is going to be taught right at that level, it should be explained that no representation of history is going to be completely unbiased. Howard Zinn should be taught along with many other authors and sources.
Don't want this thread to go off topic, so I will PM you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Good question. From what I've read Penn State University is considered a private college, but the Governor of Pennsylvania has a seat on the board of trustees along with about 6 state affiliated board members that the Governor selects like a public college.Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
Joe Paterno could demonstrate some real leadership by publicly telling those knuckleheads that he isn't the victim in this scandal. The University should set up a victim restitution fund and Joe can write the first check.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
According to the grand jury report, the 2002 McQueary incident is the only one of which Paterno was informed. The earlier incidents seemed to have gone through other channels - the State College (town) and university police. The other Penn State incident with the janitor was never reported reported to police - only his fellow janitors and supervisor. In a third case reported outside the university via the victim's mother, the university police appeared to be aware of the investigation and requested that the State College police drop, which, for whatever reason, they did. Of the eight victims, those three were the only ones in which the university had some level of involvement via a reported crime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
According known information from the grand jury report, Paterno was in the loop on one and he reported it. This is why many Penn State students, alumi and fans are still supporting him and are rather irrate over his firing. The national outrage over his (in)action is based on 1) assumption that he knew more, and 2) hindsight (Monday morning quarterbacking?) of the full and very graphic testimony of eight victims/incidents of the grand jury report. If further investigation reveals Paterno was involved, knew more and was involved in a cover up, then I will drop my support for him and toss his shattered image into the Funeral Pyre of Disillusionment and Innocence. Until then, he has my full support cultivated from a lifetime of outstanding contributions and service to Penn State and the betterment of its students.
And lest anyone thinks Penn State students stupid, selfless idiots, Penn State THON is an annual event that raises money to fight pediatric cancer. Numbers: 15000 students raised 9.5 MILLION dollars for the 2011 THON. Since its start 39 years ago, they have raised 78 MILLION dollars. Fund raising is year around and culminates in February with a 46 hour dance marathon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYDodY_CWUA&feature=related
We are...Penn State.
They fired Paterno... of course there was going to be riots. The guy is practically a god to those students. I think Paterno did what he was supposed to do. He could have done more and probably should have, but he was definitely scapegoated. The local media also played a role in this- what gets better press? The unknown school administrator who is being charged with perjury because of he involvement? Or bringing down the great Paterno? Incidentally, that's one reason why the media endured the brunt of the rioters' aggression.
Even the DA involved had made a statement about how it was curious that Paterno, who was cooperating with the investigation and was charged with nothing, was fired while the two PSU employees who were charged with wrongdoing were not fired and were having their defense paid for by the university. I'm not a big sports fan, but even I recognize that Paterno is a big reason for PSU's success. I think the board should have handled this much better.
Nope, sorry Gregoshi. Paterno doesn't get off the hook for doing his "job" and then leaving it well be. This isn't some allegation about stealing, this about child rape. Sanduski had been exposed for doing this kind of stuff since the late 90s, there is no way that Paterno, the head organizer, would not know all about this. Then for someone to come along and say that they caught Sandusky, mid rape, inside a 10 year old boy, and Paterno does what? He just tells his superior and goes back to his job? This was not some "isolated event" that Paterno could not have made a judgement call about. This was about Sandusky's perversion happening again, after it had already been long known, and long swept under the table by the university. If Paterno was a good man, he should have called the police. What was Paterno thinking when this event was swept under the rug, and Sandusky wasn't charged with anything? When Sandusky was still able to walk among the campus as if nothing had happened? Paterno was an enabler who didn't do the right thing, for whatever lame reason. He deserved to be fired, and to stick up for him because "of all the good he has done for Penn State" is ******* tribalism at its greatest, no better than the 2,000 students tipping over cars, rioting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
Grand jury report showed this pedophile committing heinous crimes since the late 90s, and all these Penn State apologists come out on every forum I frequent talking about Paterno as if he was some scapegoat who had nooooooo idea about what was going on in his own **** football program. It's disgusting.
Everything Gregoshi has said I agree with. As for the rioting... bunch of drunken idiots. It accomplishes nothing and makes Penn State look even worse. CNN did an alright interview with editor of Onward State:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#...e-psu-reax.cnn
As to the above poster, meh, you are entitled to your opinion. It's really not an uncommon one, but I can't say I agree much with. Joe did not witness the incident, and when brought to his attention he reported to his a) boss b) head of campus police. His resignation at the end of the season though was required as he will now be associated with this incident for the rest of his life.As for witness of the crime... he's got some explaining to do. He should have a) beat the living **** out of Sandusky and/or b) reported it immediately to the police.
He would have been associated with it regardless. Except now, instead of being known as someone who outed a child rapist, he will be known as the man who just kinda accepted the fact that Jerry REALLY liked the kids and just sort of rolled with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice
When you receive information that there is kiddie fiddler in your midst, you do not have a casual chat about it with your boss and then go home about your normal routine. You go to the REAL POLICE and tell them that you have good reason to believe that A KID IS BEING RAPED.
But was that clearly communicated to Paterno? Paterno's testimony indicated that he could tell McQueary to greatly bothered by what he saw and what he got from McQueary was Sandusky was "fondling or doing something of a sexual nature" with a young boy. It sounds vague. If that is how McQueary presented it to Paterno, it seems McQueary wasn't sure what he saw from Paterno's perspective. And as for the other cases, how and why would Paterno know of them? Sandusky no longer worked for Penn State and Paterno was not part of the university police department, so why would Paterno be informed, especially since none of the cases ever got to a point where charges were filed?Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
The Paterno-the-enabler crowd are basing their postition on unsupported conjecture as to what Paterno knew. I'm sure the trials and additional investigations will shed more light on how informed Paterno was of this incident and any others. Until then, it is purely "guilty until proven innocent".
Sandusky was still present at the school. If Sandusky was able to hang out in the showers, how did this man escape Paterno's eye and review? Why did Paterno not get suspicious at a man who was retired, still hanging around the showers and the area?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
Paterno worked at Penn State for 60 years. Sandusky worked there for 30 and left around 1999 when the first allegations and victims came about. How did Paterno have his head so far up his ***, that he knew absolutely nothing about one of his own coaches being a pedophile?
Now you want to tell me that "fondling or something of a sexual nature" is too vague to act on? Are you telling me, that if someone gave you the notion that there might be a child getting sexually abused, that you would do the bare minimum in following up on that? This a report from a 28 year old graduate assistant. This was not somebody young with no life experience, this not one of the players whose motivations or interpretation skills could be questioned. A full fledged adult claimed to have seen a child being sexually handled, and Paterno passed the buck and did nothing to follow up on what is one of the most serious crimes we could talk about.
For such a role model, Paterno seems to either be a willful participant or the biggest, most ignorant, oblivious man ever to run a football program.
By the way, I would like your thoughts on what Paterno knew, considering this is from the bottom of page 8 on the Grand Jury report:
"Disturbing" and "inappropriate" towards a 10 year old boy. Oh well, might be nothing.Quote:
Schults testified that he was called to a meeting with Joe Paterno and Tim Curley, in which Paterno reported "disturbing" and "inappropriate" conduct in the shower by Sandusky upon a young boy, as reported
by a student or graduate student.
I'm baffled at the argument you guys are making. As you say, even accepting his version of the story, he was told that sandusky was "fondling or doing something of a sexual nature" with a young boy by someone who was greatly bothered by what he saw. Why do you dismiss that as "it sounds vague"? Jesus.
To acin:
And Paterno, who was not a witness to the act, reported it to the head of the university police and the atheletic director. Was Paterno supposed to start his own investigation to insure that the head of the university police did his job?
As for how could Paterno not know one of his coaches was a pedophile, the two times Sandusky was caught in the act it was after hours when Sandusky thought no one was around. How come none of his players or the other coaches knew? Paterno was a great football coach, but far from All-Knowing and All-Seeing.
You have already convicted him on charges not made against him, so there is nothing else I can say to change that. I'll wait for the facts before passing judgement.
To Sasaki:
If McQueary told Paterno he saw anal sex, I think there would be little doubt as to what he saw. If all he could manage to tell Paterno was "fondling or something of a sexual nature", that sure sounds to me like McQueary wasn't sure exactly what he saw. Unfortunately, the grand jury report does not delve into what McQueary said he told Paterno, but the grand jury did find McQueary's testimony very credible, but not Curley's or Shultz's, hence the perjury charges against them. The conclusion based upon this is that Paterno's testimony must have had an air of credibility to the grand jury.
You would really have done the same thing, huh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
When nothing had been done regarding Sandusky, Paterno had the moral obligation to contact the police. Yes, he should have started his own investigation by contacting people who don't have the incentive to cover the situation up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
By the end of the "internal investigation" Paterno must have known about the decision to take away Sandusky's key. Why would they do this, if it was a baseless accusation? There is so much doubt in that situation, that any reasonable person would have said, hold on, I see some red flags here, I don't think something is right here. Sandusky is punished but isn't accused or tried? Why? The graduate student to Paterno was very concerned and yet it turned out to be nothing?
You are waiting for the facts, because the facts that have already come out are not in your favor. As far as I am concerned you waiting to pass judgement until a jury's decision is like asking for everyone to reserve judgement on O.J. Simpson until the trial is over.
Enough of reading that. Did it really take six victims before someone called the police?Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
I'm really sad that Gregoshi is splitting hairs and giving into technicalities.
Blind loyalty vs a witch hunt. Pick your side. And I am equally sad that so many people are giving in to emotion and assumptions based on hindsight rather than what was known at the time by whom.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir
My only stance on this is that the grand jury is not a trial. It is not a complete investigation. I'm not giving into technicalities, I'm (trying) to base my current opinion on what is in the grand jury report, not assumptions based on what is not. We are not privy to any testimony other than summaries and quoted phrases in the report. We are not privy to the delivery of those words that caused the grand jury to deem McQueary's testimony as credible while Curley and Shultz were deemed not credible and resulting in pejury charges against them. There are no such charge against Paterno. Here I am the one making an assumption based on something that is not in the report, but it seems fairly safe that the grand jury had no problems with Paterno's testimony.
Excuse me, but I believe Sandusky is the criminal and I'm not reserving judgement on him even though I looked at Sandusky almost as favourably as I do Paterno before all this happened. Remember, Paterno is only accused of a "moral failing" by officials. You and the others are the ones putting Paterno in the white SUV with Sandusky.Quote:
Originally Posted by acin
I've wasted enough time the past couple of days on this useless arguing. It is obvious neither of us will budge at the present. You can continue to stack wood to burn the witch with the wart and false nose and I'll continue to wear my loyalty blinders until (and IF) it is shown that the "witch" does weigh as much as a duck (yes, that is a Monty Python reference).
Paterno did the bare minimum he had to in order to cover his backside.
Yellow. Absolutely yellow
This is my contention. Doing the absolute minimum in the face of possible child abuse based on someone's standing in the community is inexcusable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Greg, there is no line in the sand until someone draws one. People should not be upset that a person got fired, they should be more upset that others did not.
Paterno's influence and reach is what led to him being fired. Regardless of what McQueary told him and how much he knew from other investigations, Paterno had way too much control and power and none of the administrators were going to interfere. Back in 2003(?) they wanted him gone when the team was struggling, and JoePa basically gave them the finger. Paterno did the legally correct thing in reporting what McQueary told him to his "supervisor", which covers his behind. The problem is that everyone knew he did not really have a supervisor at Penn State. If Paterno had informed non-PSU authorities, he would probably still be coaching, keeping it internal just reeks of impropriety (even if none actually exists). All his supporters go on about what he's done for PSU and how much he does, but that is the problem. He was Penn State, and directly responsible or not, this happened right under his nose in an environment he controlled. Spanier had to go too, clean sweep, new beginning, yada, yada, yada.
McQueary still has a job, but this may be due to the whistleblower law. My guess is he's gone soon, "on his own volition". Curley and Schultz are in deep trouble, and if Paterno did order a cover-up, their testimony will be key. But my hope is that JoePa was just clueless about the whole thing.
Fun note: The Centre County DA at the time of the '98 reports went missing under mysterious circumstances in 2005. I love PA. :yes:
Yeah, I could buy the whole "clean sweep" argument were it not for Curley and Schultz not being fired.... Instead, they're firing the cooperating witness and defending the ones charged with perjury. That's not very good optics, imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
I think Schultz has resigned already. I'm not sure why Curley is still on, it might be a legal thing pending the outcome of the perjury charge.
I really do believe this sentiment should be echoed by everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
Too many seem to wish for a negative outcome, confirming their outrage.
Yet, the man seems to have lived his life honestly and to have been an asset to his community.
Why would one impatiently condemn him and hope for anything else than proof which would exonerate him? :shrug:
Because it all looks really, REALLY bad for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowake
Well, look, my argument is this:
The life of many a human being is not really a gain for society. And then there are those whom you know to be corrupt, hypocrite, immoral, spineless, callous and about who one can’t resist to think sometimes that, should they be caught with anything, the community would be better off.
Yet this man had such a positive impact for his whole life up to this point.
So, while you conduct the investigation very thoroughly and objectively, you should hope you’ll find him not guilty, because you really want to reintegrate him in the society which benefited so much from his work.
However, the public has already driven this to the point where, even if cleared of all charges, he is still lost to his community for good and will remain ostracized.
It’s not right.
That's probably what he thought about Sandusky.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowake
How does that go? “Wait, I don’t even...”
That is, don’t split my assertion by leaving behind the boldfaced part where I write that one absolutely has to conduct the investigation very thoroughly and objectively.
That’s why I put it there :tired:
Fantastic article in Grantland that perfectly describes the whole scandal and the aftermath:
Quote:
If that blights Joe Paterno's declining years, that's too bad. If that takes a chunk out of the endowment, hold a damn bake sale. If that means that Penn State spends some time being known as the university where a child got raped, that's what happens when you're a university where a child got raped. Any sympathy for this institution went down the drain in the shower room in the Lasch Building. There's nothing that can happen to the university, or to the people sunk up to their eyeballs in this incredible moral quagmire, that's worse than what happened to the children who got raped at Penn State. Good Lord, people, get up off your knees and get over yourselves.
A) surely a crime of child rape would have to be reported to external (real) cops?
It's like a child molester priest only being investigated internally by the organization.
B) teaching kids to play a game is not such a great service to the community. It is a game for entertainment. It is not community service in the form of soup kitchens, charity, medical service or anything that saves lives it is merely teaching kids for the modern circus.
C) even if you lead a great life you get branded with your lowest act.
I cannot fathom the idea that anyone can say this head coach performed his duty of care beyond going through the minimum paperwork. Put your kid in the victims shoes and tell me that the coach did everything in his power to have the situation investigated.
Put it this way that lack of energetic performance on the playing field would get a player dropped. Going through the motions is not the same as being a high performer. Coaches have a duty of care and a head coach also has to ensure he is providing a safe operating environment for all under his care.
One cannot attribute all the victories and none of the responsibilities. His football wins, hence the buck stops with him. He should have reported the issue for external investigation to provide transparency in a timely manner.
joepa should have been fired years ago. his stats suck. 46 years with a single organization and only two championships? pathetic. Most winningest coach doesnt mean jack if you have been a coach for 46 freaking years......
Oh I understand the cult like following. After all I compared it to religious sexual abuse in the second part of the quoted point.
I follow the All Blacks... in NZ rugby union is not so much a sport as a religion.
^Looks at his location. Traitor.
I'm a West Islander and if anything a Sand Groper first.Quote:
Originally Posted by hero di classico
Fiji (where I was born) and New Zealand (where I grew up) took part in the Federation of Australia but in the end declined.
Without NZ the legendary ANZACs would sound like a cat coughing up a hair ball AAC
& ANZUS also would have a different ring to it ;)
I could start a "people abuses" thread but I suppose I'll just post it here:
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/ind...ky_victim.html
Quote:
Victim One, the first known alleged victim of abuse by former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky, had to leave his school in the middle of his senior year because of bullying, his counselor said Sunday.
Officials at Central Mountain High School in Clinton County weren’t providing guidance for fellow students, who were reacting badly about Joe Paterno’s firing and blaming the 17-year-old, said Mike Gillum, the psychologist helping his family. Those officials were unavailable for comment this weekend.
The name-calling and verbal threats were just too much, he said.
Other alleged victims are turning to each other for support, since they fear others will out them and cause a media swarm. The only encouragement for Victim One, Gillum said, is watching other alleged victims come forward because they felt empowered by his courage.
“He feels good about that,” Gillum said. “That’s the one good that’s come of all this.”
:(. Poor kid he didn't do anything wrong... those kids should be ashamed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro