Printable View
As if all torture and the ethnic cleansing of blacks in Libya wasn't enough Egypt accepts a really cool law that must be a godsend to people who just want their wive to really shut up. It's ok to have sex with your wive as long as she hasn't been dead for more than 6 hours. Even after 1 it's probably pretty cold to me but we don't have the temperatures Egypt has, 2 hours should be possible there in theory. But six? Oh crap you just got respect that if you can
lololol
Oh I did it wrong, it's just proposed I tried too hard, but who knows what comes out of it.
lololol
Link?
Yes it's me don't worry didn't I save you countles times alreadyQuote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
:dancinglock:
Make it stop. Please.
It stopped it but t just isn't over. TechnicalyQuote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir
I'm hoping that is a Zelda reference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Anyway Frag, you have to provide a link for this sort of stuff, or else I will be locking the thread.
Oh lock i then, it's still hilarisch though
Found summit on reuters interwebby site
Egypt to Allow Men to Have Sex with Dead Wives?
Quote:
By Stephanie Rabiner, Esq. at FindLaw.com
Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:03am EDT
Necrophilia may soon be legal in Egypt. No really, it's true.
The country's Islamist-dominated government has introduced a law that would allow a man to have sex with his wife for up to six hours after her death, the Daily Mail reports. Yes, after her death.Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Don't lock it. I have some remarks to make that I really feel are important here but I need to leave, will be back tonight.
As if I would ever lie to you
http://bit.ly/IWVKHoQuote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
From what I can see, after fact checking it as true as everything Westboro church is saying=US law suggestions.
What? You mean the Daily Mail is wrong? Inconceivable!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
May be more interesting than that:Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
http://volokh.com/2012/04/27/questio...osed-in-egypt/
AllahPundit (Hot Air), Andrew Sullivan, and Dan Murphy (Christian Science Monitor) question whether a bill allowing people to have sex with their dead spouses (for up to six hours after the death) was indeed proposed in the Egyptian Parliament. The story apparently began in the Al Ahram newspaper, and was then taken up by the Al Arabiya newspaper; AllahPundit suggests they are not to be trusted:AllahPundit counsels skepticism, but is not sure:
Al-Ahram is controlled by the Egyptian government, which I assume means it’s heavily influenced by the ruling military junta. And the junta, of course, is invested in discrediting the Islamists in order to defend its prerogatives against parliament’s growing power. (It’s worth noting too that Al-Arabiya, which picked up the story from Al-Ahram, is a Saudi outfit and the Saudis are mighty anxious about the idea of Islamist populists seizing power from sclerotic tyrannical regimes.)
Sullivan and the Monitor seem to go further. I don’t know who’s right and who’s wrong, but thought I’d note the possibility that Al Ahram and Al Arabiya may not be accurate on this.
[N]one of this is to say the story isn’t true — the part about the marriage age being lowered is all too plausible — but it’s not hard to see why Mubarak allies might want to make something up or inflate something one of the fringier parliamentarians said in order to galvanize international opinion against the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists. It is, however, hard to see why the MB would allow parliament to entertain a law like this at a moment when they’re busy gladhanding westerners to reassure them that the Brotherhood are “modern” Islamists who are worthy of foreign aid and trade deals. If this really is being kicked around by MPs, I’d bet it’s the Salafists who are pushing it. But we’ll see.
We actually talked about this in class this very day.
Al-Ahram is definitely wrong here. The article linked earlier was actually quite correct: a few years ago there was an apparently self-styled (important!) imam from Morocco by the name of Abd al-Bari Zamzami, from a relatively influential family of religious scholars in Morocco (not Egypt) who ruled that there is nothing in the shari‘a that forbids (note the wording) a man having sex with a woman a few hours before his death. He viewed this as a way for the man (I'm totally serious here) to eh..say farewell to his wife one more time.
Cue an intrepid reporter asking questions such as: "Can a woman have sex with her dead husband?" and (seriously): "If a man has four wives and if one of which dies and he immediately remarries, can he still legally have sex with her corpse?". Apparently, Zamzami didn't really know how to reply to this and was actually in something of a hilarious interview from what I heard.
Besides, crazy fatwas are declared all the time, especially since after Mubarak's fall, and they don't have to mean anything. On Facebook there are links going around of "the craziest fatwas of 2011", check this link for example.
The nuance is never is good as the outrage :(
The parlement actually discussing necrophilae more then makes up, or is it down, for ehm...... it, though. I don't think nuance is always good. Once heard eyeballs cool down faster, they are like binballsQuote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Please learn how to write in a forigen language
If you wanted to use Dutch you should have never of left New York
OK hehQuote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Dude, you did not even spell foreign correctly! You are bitching at him to use better English, when it is not his primary language, even though your English is worse, and English is your primary language! Everyone makes simple grammatical mistakes or doesn't care enough to make their sentences perfect (like that beautiful run-on of mine just earlier), but they at least try to make them understandable. I spend more time trying to decipher your massacre of the English language than I actually do responding to you. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't criticize other people's English. ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Don't get between me and the tulipQuote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
-snip-
Agreed, and as long as Strike is breathing I don't find it all that perverse.
Ik hou van je.
-snip-Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
I didn't know he was your cousin...Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
-snip-
-snip-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkX7ga_uR-UQuote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
-snip-
You know what I was referring too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
LOL calling Fragony a "tulip" is a slur?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
Am I about to get stripped of my modship?
No, it is not a slur. Neither is limey, patty, or macaroni.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
So you just admitted you pulled your accusation out of your ***?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
When are you joining the marines again?
If this is an attempent to be clever, macaorni should be removed and replaced with dago, wop, or gunieaQuote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
Trust me Strike, as someone with a half Sicilian mother, I have heard them all. And yes, macaroni and grease ball are two very common ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Don't you know sarcasm when you hear it, or is your brain so far up...in the clouds that it went right over your head.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Sarcasm doesnt translate well through text. That's why I usually put a "(!)" after a sarcastic sentance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
So not only are you a fool, you also surround yourself with them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
BULLY!
Um... In a way he's kinda surrounded himself with us.
The fact he found his way here is an unfrotunate accident.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyblades
Wargames tend to bring in a few stragglers
According to this, that law was some rumor.
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/...s_full_of_lies
Things have cleared off-topic.
If you want to discuss this, feel free to remake the topic citing sources in the opening post, presented with an argument.