Two eleven year old children, who are best of friends, have an argument.
The none white child calls the white child 'White Chocolate'
The white child replys 'Nigga'
This actual event happend
but what do you think - happened next ?
Printable View
Two eleven year old children, who are best of friends, have an argument.
The none white child calls the white child 'White Chocolate'
The white child replys 'Nigga'
This actual event happend
but what do you think - happened next ?
The carrotmunching crowd demands the white kids head?
And gets it?
The staunchly religious parents of the black child beat him for three weeks to within an inch of his life with serrated belts, take him to the local pastor for exorcism and then have him transported back to Nigeria where he is sold into service with the Lord's Resistance Army.
The white child's horrified parents would have told him how disappointed they have become, but this would obviously damage his psychological well-being so instead they pre-pay an insurance policy for life-long therapy when he comes of age, buy him some transgender/mixed race Action Person dolls (no guns but revision notes included) and go to shudder at a dinner party with some friends in Islington.
Am I close? :bounce:
In the U.S. the white child would be home-schooled and grow up to be a televangelist; and the black child would end up in prison for economic crimes against the state.
The none white child turns out to be Asian :idea2:
They both end up lifelong friends? :jumping:
The white child is prosecuted under some law or other? (I seem to remember my teacher telling me about a case like this).
A post is made on a forum for Total war games.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
I just know that's a correct answer...:2thumbsup:
Nice reply mateQuote:
Originally Posted by Mithrandir
~;)
:bow:
Don't want to go to far on-topic, but spit it out, gimme the dirt. What happened?
Would be nice if they remained best friends, so adult over-reaction whould be a pity. A friendship like this does more for good race-relations than the banning of words, however abhorrent.
However, I hope no-one thinks that "white choclate" and "nigga" are equally bad. The fact that there are no equivalents to "nigga" for the white child should tell us which of the two is more likely to experience real racism in later life.
I do. It is what you make of it. In this case equally harmless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Gloucester
OK so you what to know what happened next.
The non white childs parents complained to the police about Racism, the eleven year old white girl has to report to the police station tomorrow to be charged.
The local community, which is 50% white and 50% none-white are trying to get the papers and local MP involved to sort this out.
Hmmmm in that case I am a bit dissapointed, if these black folks complain about racism the police has to seek it out. Why these parents complaint in the first place is beyond me though, if everyone would just stop feeding raci$m by emphasising it's pressence (which is neglectable) it wouldn't be an issue at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
fools.
This is obviously not something the police should be spending their time on (hopefully they'll hear the girl out and decide not to press the charge) but it's understandable that the parents feel insulted.
Both kids should apologize and that should be the end of it in my opinion.
If you're black, then this is encouraging; if you are not, then it can be ignored. The impact of a word depends upon its speaker and the hearers. Some words, and this is one, hold a history and a ton of emotion. The white child needs this explaining to her (and perhaps so do you): this should be sufficient.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Agreed. I am interested to know which law has been broken, and whether both children have broken it. It is a shame that the police did not advise the parents to take another course of action. Any chance of these two remaining friends has receded. Disappointing indeed.Quote:
Hmmmm in that case I am a bit dissapointed, if these black folks complain about racism the police has to seek it out.
They settle it with a good game of M:TW. Modded, of course, with XL or N:TW.
The non white kid is probably embarrassed because of what his parents did.
Friends should be able to call eachother names and just laugh it off. :shame:
Sufficient for what? Not my fault blacks look up to whites. History has nothing to do with it, why encourage a sense of victimhood? There is none nowadays.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Gloucester
[edited by solypsist]
It always in good fun though and as a joke, Just like this probably was, Some idiot parents blew it way out of proportion. If it bothered the kid that much demanding a simple sorry would suffice:wall:
[edited by solypsist]
It always in good fun though and as a joke, Just like this probably was, Some idiot parents blew it way out of proportion. If it bothered the kid that much demanding a simple sorry would suffice:wall:[/QUOTE]
As it is for two, four wrongs don't make a right.
No, much better to turn up mobhanded to arrest a pensioner who confiscated a colleagues ball after it had smash the glass in his greenhouse.Quote:
This is obviously not something the police should be spending their time on
Damn right, this is really sad. There are way to many geriatric old men out there who deserve a good beatdown for the police to be concerned about a little racist kid throwing slurs. :shame:
As long as we all know it's a joke or just in good fun...why does it matter?Quote:
Originally Posted by InsaneApache
Because it is demeaning and just plain wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by ceasar010
If that's what you think then lets just agree to disagree.
The white child would have its name put in the Racist Book, whilst the non-white child would not. Everyone knows non-whites cannot be racist... They have had all their countries' insurmountable riches plundered by the evil fascist white colonial empires, and are fully entitled to seek revenge and retribution for such.
I think one of the issues is that, the racism perpetrated against a white person, wasn't seen as important. Wheras the slur directed against a black person was.
Also kids cannot be labeled "racist", they are far too young and have no idea what they're talking about. They often copy other peoples swear words without knowing the significance, this is no different. How many kids do you see laughing at disabled people? Or pointing at someone with an unusual dress sense. Do we take them down to the cop shop? I think not.
The big difference between many white and black is the tolerance. For example about three weeks ago I was on a bus in the evening when I heard some youths descending the stairs shouting. One of which bellowed "white motherf**kers", followed by "you're all white motherf**kers" back at those still on the bus. I felt slightly offended but did not pull out my phone and call the police, neither did any of the other white people on the bus. A few of the older black people notably a few women actually found this funny. Luckily so did the whites, and basically it was forgotten (I actually only remembered it just now myself). The difference is that if this had been white youths shouting "******" or something similar there would have been a scandal. It may have made the local news. Some black people on the other hand, whom more often than not despise the police and avoid contact with them when a crime occurs within their own communities, don't hesitate to contact the "pigs" if someone has uttered so much of a hint of a racial slur against them or their own. These are not the majority of course, they are just a few taking advantage of the nanny state's current stance on 'racism'.
The main issue of course is that there shouldn't have been any police involvement and the girl shouldn't be reporting to the police. It should have been sorted out by the parents, proving themselves as despisers of racism by dealing with each other as equals. But sadly this is the politically correct, litigatively obsessed society in which we now live.
And you don´t know what real friendship is...Quote:
Originally Posted by InsaneApache
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Don't get out much, do you ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
In sweden the withe kid goes to youth jail. And the peopelo laugh about the black kid.
God in sweden you are a naxi if you like your country, so don't have any national symbols at home!!!
Yet another wonderful result of the civil "rights" movement. :no:
That poor white girl's life has probably been ruined, and that of her family's, because of some vengeful .... people. :shame:
Removed at staff demand.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
There's a book by that title (Liberalism is a Mental Disorder) written by nationally syndicated radio show host, Michael Savage. Apparently not too bad a read, many reader/reviewers found it quite thought-provoking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectic
Obviously you'll hate it if firmly committed to the left-wing, but if centrist-to-conservative it may be worth a look.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal...ental_Disorder
You really need to read up on liberal theory before making these types of ridiculous statements.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectic
Yes I am aware that some so called liberal politicians have taken this "politically correct" aspect to a, dare I say, fascist degree. Punishing people for using certain words is not liberal. Indeed it is a very ironic situation and it has to do with the civil rights movement, which unfortunatly gave birth a new generation of liberals who carry this terrible trait of being capitulationist. Both blacks and whites feel inferior to eachother now, and there seems to be no quick fix for it, except completely ignoring that part of our history and starting fresh. I don't understand the "we must learn from mistakes" garbage. The more we are reminded of this emotion side of side of slave history the more we look at eachother as being "different". The only way to be the same and at the same time be ourselves is to treat eachother the same. All this however is a strange and ironic twist to American liberalism, and is not what real liberalism is about.
I think DA, that you don't realize a lot of the more admirable qualities of the consevative movement in America are in fact based on Liberalism.
Sorry the logical extension of civil rights would be for the girls to be treated equally. This is political correctness, which is an altogether different beast.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Both girls should have been told off by their respective parents and then told to apologise to the other girl. At 11 it is a waste of police resources, the possibly should intervene if neither set of parents can set a good enough example. But if police have to get involved because the parents are incapable of being adults then I would scare the cr@p out of the parents by running the possibility of getting child welfare services involved (just to get them to pull their fingers out and to stop using police resources).
If there was threats of violence from the parents then the cops should be concentrating on the adults (and again swing the idea of them being unsuitable as parents).
I've heard this guy's name before -- usually in the context of those amusing "American Taliban" pages that were cropping up a year ago. This Savage guy clearly has some extreme ideas, so I'm not sure you'd want to peg him as "centrist-to-conservative." Maybe "ubercon-to-wingnut" might be a better spectrum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geezer57
Direct quote:
Others have written about it, I think these people need to be forcibly converted to Christianity but I'll get here a little later, I'll move up to that. It's the only thing that can probably turn them into human beings.
I'm going to give you one further example from my background as an anthropologist just so that you -- I'm trying to put context on this because you can go crazy if you don't have the context on this, because I'm going to lead up to something of what we must do to these primitives. Because these primitives can only be treated in one way, and I don't think smallpox and a blanket is good enough incidentally. Just before -- I'm going to give you a little precursor to where I'm going. Smallpox in a blanket, which the U.S. Army gave to the Cherokee Indians on their long march to the West, was nothing compared to what I'd like to see done to these people, just so you understand that I'm not going to be too intellectual about my analysis here in terms of what I would recommend, what Doc Savage recommends as an antidote to this kind of poison coming out of the Middle East from these non-humans.
He's definitely on the wingnut end of the spectrum. His real name is Michael Weiner. Apparently he's ashamed to be Jewish. As Weiner, he's written many books. He started writing about tribal medicines (his field of study was ethnobotany and anthropology), then he had some kind of nervous breakdown and went off the deep end. His later books, as he was also morphing into the nutcase he is today, were all about homeopathic medicine and herbal cures for things like Alzheimers. A real nut job this guy. Under one name he pushes homeopathic cures for everything under the sun, and under another name he rants and raves and drools from the far right end of the political spectrum. I wonder how many machine gun-toting backwoods rednecks reading his Savage persona books know that he's selling books under the Weiner name to patchouli-scented hippies looking for that perfect herbal cure, and vice versa. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
Why ? Are they going to put her in jail ? Re-education ? No, she just had to go to the police station, the kids will probably make up some day.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Besides, the non-white parents were of course, being quite stupid, but what about the cops ? Isn't part of their job to restore order ? They should have seen this 11y old girl and told her what she did was wrong, there was no reason to threat her like they did. They're not robots bound to follow to law to its every letter, they are humans and should possess decent judgement, if they were fit for their kind of work :no:
Maybe he isn't a wingnut, just a very brilliant writer who writes for his target audience. His books may not be editorial or based on his personal beliefs, just print for people who will buy them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenlic
There are plenty of sitcom writers who don't believe in what they are writing for, but it pays the bills...
Both families move to Canada where there is no such thing as racism. And they live happily ever after in Canada.
Well not in Finland anyway, maybe you still have a negroe hanging at every lamppost and are still shipping them to the cottonfields for a crashcourse in respect, but otherwise I have no idea what you are talking about. At least here blacks have the same rights, so they should just stop complaining 'owww we are so disciminatut' because it's very annoying. The only ones discriminating blacks are the pc crowd who just won't stop making excuses they would never allow for themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman